基于超过1300万参与者的胆结石疾病与泛癌发病率风险之间的关系

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Cancer Medicine Pub Date : 2025-04-25 DOI:10.1002/cam4.70857
Wenqian Yu, Jin Zhou, Jing Luo, Jing Xia, Shiyi Li, Linjun Xie, YaZhou He, Hongyu Li, Guoheng Jiang, Xin Chen, Xuan Bai, Min Mao, Xin Wang
{"title":"基于超过1300万参与者的胆结石疾病与泛癌发病率风险之间的关系","authors":"Wenqian Yu,&nbsp;Jin Zhou,&nbsp;Jing Luo,&nbsp;Jing Xia,&nbsp;Shiyi Li,&nbsp;Linjun Xie,&nbsp;YaZhou He,&nbsp;Hongyu Li,&nbsp;Guoheng Jiang,&nbsp;Xin Chen,&nbsp;Xuan Bai,&nbsp;Min Mao,&nbsp;Xin Wang","doi":"10.1002/cam4.70857","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Increasing evidence connects gallstone disease (GSD) to all types of cancer incidence; however, the results were inconsistent. The present study aimed to evaluate whether and to what extent these associations exist comprehensively.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We systematically searched published longitudinal studies indexed in PubMed and Embase database from dates of inception to March 31, 2020. We pooled the effect of GSD on all-cause cancer incidence. Moreover, we further employed stratified analysis concerning sex, geographic background, surgery status, and follow-up period. Trial sequential analysis (TSA) was applied to decide whether the included sample size was sufficient for evaluating these associations.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Fifty-one studies incorporating over 13 million participants were eligible for analysis in this study. GSD pose an increased risk of all-cause cancer risk (pooled RR = 1.43; 95% CI: 1.33–1.54) compared with the healthy controls, especially hematologic malignancy (pooled RR = 1.14; 95% CI: 1.05–1.25), gastrointestinal cancers (pooled RR = 1.28; 95% CI: 1.15–1.41), liver, pancreas, and biliary tract cancer (pooled RR = 1.84; 95% CI: 1.62–2.10), and kidney cancer (pooled RR = 1.19; 95% CI: 1.03–1.37). These associations are not markedly changed after stratification by different subgroups. Moreover, the TSA confirmed the sample size was sufficient to draw these conclusive conclusions.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The present meta-analysis with sufficient evidence indicates GSD increases the risk for all causes of cancer incidence. The evidence may warrant GSD patients to perform screening and prophylactic treatment for the prevention of these complications. The indication for cholecystectomy should be determined through a comprehensive evaluation of the patient's clinical presentation, with a thorough assessment of the potential therapeutic benefits and surgical risks.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":139,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Medicine","volume":"14 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cam4.70857","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Associations Between Gallstone Disease and Pan-Cancer Incidence Risk Based on Over 13 Million Participants\",\"authors\":\"Wenqian Yu,&nbsp;Jin Zhou,&nbsp;Jing Luo,&nbsp;Jing Xia,&nbsp;Shiyi Li,&nbsp;Linjun Xie,&nbsp;YaZhou He,&nbsp;Hongyu Li,&nbsp;Guoheng Jiang,&nbsp;Xin Chen,&nbsp;Xuan Bai,&nbsp;Min Mao,&nbsp;Xin Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cam4.70857\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Increasing evidence connects gallstone disease (GSD) to all types of cancer incidence; however, the results were inconsistent. The present study aimed to evaluate whether and to what extent these associations exist comprehensively.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We systematically searched published longitudinal studies indexed in PubMed and Embase database from dates of inception to March 31, 2020. We pooled the effect of GSD on all-cause cancer incidence. Moreover, we further employed stratified analysis concerning sex, geographic background, surgery status, and follow-up period. Trial sequential analysis (TSA) was applied to decide whether the included sample size was sufficient for evaluating these associations.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Fifty-one studies incorporating over 13 million participants were eligible for analysis in this study. GSD pose an increased risk of all-cause cancer risk (pooled RR = 1.43; 95% CI: 1.33–1.54) compared with the healthy controls, especially hematologic malignancy (pooled RR = 1.14; 95% CI: 1.05–1.25), gastrointestinal cancers (pooled RR = 1.28; 95% CI: 1.15–1.41), liver, pancreas, and biliary tract cancer (pooled RR = 1.84; 95% CI: 1.62–2.10), and kidney cancer (pooled RR = 1.19; 95% CI: 1.03–1.37). These associations are not markedly changed after stratification by different subgroups. Moreover, the TSA confirmed the sample size was sufficient to draw these conclusive conclusions.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>The present meta-analysis with sufficient evidence indicates GSD increases the risk for all causes of cancer incidence. The evidence may warrant GSD patients to perform screening and prophylactic treatment for the prevention of these complications. The indication for cholecystectomy should be determined through a comprehensive evaluation of the patient's clinical presentation, with a thorough assessment of the potential therapeutic benefits and surgical risks.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":139,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer Medicine\",\"volume\":\"14 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cam4.70857\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cam4.70857\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cam4.70857","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:越来越多的证据表明胆结石病(GSD)与所有类型的癌症发病率有关;然而,结果并不一致。本研究旨在全面评估这些关联是否存在以及在多大程度上存在。方法系统检索PubMed和Embase数据库中收录的从成立日期到2020年3月31日的已发表的纵向研究。我们汇总了GSD对全因癌症发病率的影响。此外,我们进一步对性别、地理背景、手术状况和随访时间进行了分层分析。采用试验序列分析(TSA)来确定纳入的样本量是否足以评估这些关联。结果51项研究纳入了超过1300万参与者,符合本研究的分析条件。GSD增加了全因癌症风险(合并RR = 1.43;95% CI: 1.33-1.54),特别是血液恶性肿瘤(合并RR = 1.14;95% CI: 1.05-1.25),胃肠道癌症(合并RR = 1.28;95% CI: 1.15-1.41)、肝癌、胰腺癌和胆道癌(合并RR = 1.84;95% CI: 1.62-2.10)和肾癌(合并RR = 1.19;95% ci: 1.03-1.37)。这些关联在不同亚群分层后没有明显改变。此外,运输安全管理局确认样本量足以得出这些结论性结论。结论本荟萃分析有充分的证据表明,GSD增加了所有癌症发生的风险。证据可能保证GSD患者进行筛查和预防性治疗,以预防这些并发症。胆囊切除术的适应症应通过对患者临床表现的综合评价来确定,并对潜在的治疗益处和手术风险进行全面评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The Associations Between Gallstone Disease and Pan-Cancer Incidence Risk Based on Over 13 Million Participants

The Associations Between Gallstone Disease and Pan-Cancer Incidence Risk Based on Over 13 Million Participants

Background

Increasing evidence connects gallstone disease (GSD) to all types of cancer incidence; however, the results were inconsistent. The present study aimed to evaluate whether and to what extent these associations exist comprehensively.

Methods

We systematically searched published longitudinal studies indexed in PubMed and Embase database from dates of inception to March 31, 2020. We pooled the effect of GSD on all-cause cancer incidence. Moreover, we further employed stratified analysis concerning sex, geographic background, surgery status, and follow-up period. Trial sequential analysis (TSA) was applied to decide whether the included sample size was sufficient for evaluating these associations.

Results

Fifty-one studies incorporating over 13 million participants were eligible for analysis in this study. GSD pose an increased risk of all-cause cancer risk (pooled RR = 1.43; 95% CI: 1.33–1.54) compared with the healthy controls, especially hematologic malignancy (pooled RR = 1.14; 95% CI: 1.05–1.25), gastrointestinal cancers (pooled RR = 1.28; 95% CI: 1.15–1.41), liver, pancreas, and biliary tract cancer (pooled RR = 1.84; 95% CI: 1.62–2.10), and kidney cancer (pooled RR = 1.19; 95% CI: 1.03–1.37). These associations are not markedly changed after stratification by different subgroups. Moreover, the TSA confirmed the sample size was sufficient to draw these conclusive conclusions.

Conclusions

The present meta-analysis with sufficient evidence indicates GSD increases the risk for all causes of cancer incidence. The evidence may warrant GSD patients to perform screening and prophylactic treatment for the prevention of these complications. The indication for cholecystectomy should be determined through a comprehensive evaluation of the patient's clinical presentation, with a thorough assessment of the potential therapeutic benefits and surgical risks.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cancer Medicine
Cancer Medicine ONCOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
2.50%
发文量
907
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍: Cancer Medicine is a peer-reviewed, open access, interdisciplinary journal providing rapid publication of research from global biomedical researchers across the cancer sciences. The journal will consider submissions from all oncologic specialties, including, but not limited to, the following areas: Clinical Cancer Research Translational research ∙ clinical trials ∙ chemotherapy ∙ radiation therapy ∙ surgical therapy ∙ clinical observations ∙ clinical guidelines ∙ genetic consultation ∙ ethical considerations Cancer Biology: Molecular biology ∙ cellular biology ∙ molecular genetics ∙ genomics ∙ immunology ∙ epigenetics ∙ metabolic studies ∙ proteomics ∙ cytopathology ∙ carcinogenesis ∙ drug discovery and delivery. Cancer Prevention: Behavioral science ∙ psychosocial studies ∙ screening ∙ nutrition ∙ epidemiology and prevention ∙ community outreach. Bioinformatics: Gene expressions profiles ∙ gene regulation networks ∙ genome bioinformatics ∙ pathwayanalysis ∙ prognostic biomarkers. Cancer Medicine publishes original research articles, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and research methods papers, along with invited editorials and commentaries. Original research papers must report well-conducted research with conclusions supported by the data presented in the paper.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信