Jiawei Jiang, Zhifeng Yan, Jinshi Jian, Shushi Peng, Hanqin Tian, Kendalynn A. Morris, Robert M. Ellam, Jesper Riis Christiansen, Huai Chen, Jianzhi Dong, Si-Liang Li, Pingqing Fu, Dabo Guan, Guirui Yu, Cong-Qiang Liu, Philippe Ciais, Ben Bond-Lamberty
{"title":"通过扩大局部测量估算全球土壤甲烷吸收","authors":"Jiawei Jiang, Zhifeng Yan, Jinshi Jian, Shushi Peng, Hanqin Tian, Kendalynn A. Morris, Robert M. Ellam, Jesper Riis Christiansen, Huai Chen, Jianzhi Dong, Si-Liang Li, Pingqing Fu, Dabo Guan, Guirui Yu, Cong-Qiang Liu, Philippe Ciais, Ben Bond-Lamberty","doi":"10.1111/gcb.70194","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Aerobic soils remove methane from the atmosphere, but global soil methane uptake (SMU) estimates remain highly uncertain due to challenges in scaling local data. We develop a data-driven approach to refine this global estimate by incorporating local data of 79,800 flux measurements from 198 sites. This novel approach links the global SMU budget to local SMU fluxes by varying its parameters with soil properties. Our 2003–2018 global SMU estimate is ~39.0 Tg CH<sub>4</sub> year<sup>−1</sup>—about 30% higher than existing bottom-up estimates and consistent with top-down assessments. Cold grasslands and deserts were found to contribute nearly 30% of the total SMU, while disturbed agricultural biomes have the lowest SMU. The projected future global SMU is shaped by temperature and atmospheric methane, though local SMU is primarily influenced by changes in soil moisture. This study emphasizes the potential of soils in climate regulation and highlights the need to focus on key biomes for a better understanding of the soil-atmosphere methane feedback and optimizing methane management strategies.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":175,"journal":{"name":"Global Change Biology","volume":"31 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Global Soil Methane Uptake Estimated by Scaling Up Local Measurements\",\"authors\":\"Jiawei Jiang, Zhifeng Yan, Jinshi Jian, Shushi Peng, Hanqin Tian, Kendalynn A. Morris, Robert M. Ellam, Jesper Riis Christiansen, Huai Chen, Jianzhi Dong, Si-Liang Li, Pingqing Fu, Dabo Guan, Guirui Yu, Cong-Qiang Liu, Philippe Ciais, Ben Bond-Lamberty\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/gcb.70194\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>Aerobic soils remove methane from the atmosphere, but global soil methane uptake (SMU) estimates remain highly uncertain due to challenges in scaling local data. We develop a data-driven approach to refine this global estimate by incorporating local data of 79,800 flux measurements from 198 sites. This novel approach links the global SMU budget to local SMU fluxes by varying its parameters with soil properties. Our 2003–2018 global SMU estimate is ~39.0 Tg CH<sub>4</sub> year<sup>−1</sup>—about 30% higher than existing bottom-up estimates and consistent with top-down assessments. Cold grasslands and deserts were found to contribute nearly 30% of the total SMU, while disturbed agricultural biomes have the lowest SMU. The projected future global SMU is shaped by temperature and atmospheric methane, though local SMU is primarily influenced by changes in soil moisture. This study emphasizes the potential of soils in climate regulation and highlights the need to focus on key biomes for a better understanding of the soil-atmosphere methane feedback and optimizing methane management strategies.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":175,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Change Biology\",\"volume\":\"31 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Change Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gcb.70194\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Change Biology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gcb.70194","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
Global Soil Methane Uptake Estimated by Scaling Up Local Measurements
Aerobic soils remove methane from the atmosphere, but global soil methane uptake (SMU) estimates remain highly uncertain due to challenges in scaling local data. We develop a data-driven approach to refine this global estimate by incorporating local data of 79,800 flux measurements from 198 sites. This novel approach links the global SMU budget to local SMU fluxes by varying its parameters with soil properties. Our 2003–2018 global SMU estimate is ~39.0 Tg CH4 year−1—about 30% higher than existing bottom-up estimates and consistent with top-down assessments. Cold grasslands and deserts were found to contribute nearly 30% of the total SMU, while disturbed agricultural biomes have the lowest SMU. The projected future global SMU is shaped by temperature and atmospheric methane, though local SMU is primarily influenced by changes in soil moisture. This study emphasizes the potential of soils in climate regulation and highlights the need to focus on key biomes for a better understanding of the soil-atmosphere methane feedback and optimizing methane management strategies.
期刊介绍:
Global Change Biology is an environmental change journal committed to shaping the future and addressing the world's most pressing challenges, including sustainability, climate change, environmental protection, food and water safety, and global health.
Dedicated to fostering a profound understanding of the impacts of global change on biological systems and offering innovative solutions, the journal publishes a diverse range of content, including primary research articles, technical advances, research reviews, reports, opinions, perspectives, commentaries, and letters. Starting with the 2024 volume, Global Change Biology will transition to an online-only format, enhancing accessibility and contributing to the evolution of scholarly communication.