Nafisa N. Ahmed, Raju Pokharel, Jessica Miesel, Christopher M. Saffron
{"title":"评估密歇根州固定式和便携式系统中利用森林生物质生产生物炭的原料有效性和经济可行性","authors":"Nafisa N. Ahmed, Raju Pokharel, Jessica Miesel, Christopher M. Saffron","doi":"10.1111/gcbb.70030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The accumulation of small-diameter and low-value trees and logging residues can negatively impact forest health by increasing the risks of pests, diseases, and wildfires. Biochar production presents a potential solution by creating markets for these underutilized resources. However, there is limited information on market dynamics and the influence of subregional conditions on the use of forest biomass for biochar. The study identified potential locations for biochar production and developed procurement zones using delivered wood prices to evaluate biomass availability and biochar application. The minimum selling prices (MSP) for biochar were calculated for local applications to assess the cost savings. Under a baseline scenario with an average delivered biomass price of $23.25 per green ton, stationary facilities produced 71% more biochar than the estimated requirements in the Upper Peninsula (UP) but only 10% more in the Lower Peninsula (LP). Portable units, however, produced less biochar than the required application in both regions, with deficits of 4% in the UP and 50% in the LP. While stationary facilities are more cost-effective and scalable, portable units can procure more biomass and offer greater opportunities for land application of biochar. Despite a lower MSP for stationary facilities, portable units could provide a more economical option by reducing investment costs and risks. The study recommends establishing portable units in the UP and stationary facilities in the LP to optimize forest biomass procurement and biochar production in Michigan. This analysis contributes to understanding resource availability and the potential utilization of forest biomass for biochar in Michigan.</p>","PeriodicalId":55126,"journal":{"name":"Global Change Biology Bioenergy","volume":"17 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gcbb.70030","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing Feedstock Availability and Economic Feasibility of Utilizing Forest Biomass for Biochar Production in Stationary and Portable Systems in Michigan\",\"authors\":\"Nafisa N. Ahmed, Raju Pokharel, Jessica Miesel, Christopher M. Saffron\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/gcbb.70030\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The accumulation of small-diameter and low-value trees and logging residues can negatively impact forest health by increasing the risks of pests, diseases, and wildfires. Biochar production presents a potential solution by creating markets for these underutilized resources. However, there is limited information on market dynamics and the influence of subregional conditions on the use of forest biomass for biochar. The study identified potential locations for biochar production and developed procurement zones using delivered wood prices to evaluate biomass availability and biochar application. The minimum selling prices (MSP) for biochar were calculated for local applications to assess the cost savings. Under a baseline scenario with an average delivered biomass price of $23.25 per green ton, stationary facilities produced 71% more biochar than the estimated requirements in the Upper Peninsula (UP) but only 10% more in the Lower Peninsula (LP). Portable units, however, produced less biochar than the required application in both regions, with deficits of 4% in the UP and 50% in the LP. While stationary facilities are more cost-effective and scalable, portable units can procure more biomass and offer greater opportunities for land application of biochar. Despite a lower MSP for stationary facilities, portable units could provide a more economical option by reducing investment costs and risks. The study recommends establishing portable units in the UP and stationary facilities in the LP to optimize forest biomass procurement and biochar production in Michigan. This analysis contributes to understanding resource availability and the potential utilization of forest biomass for biochar in Michigan.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55126,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Change Biology Bioenergy\",\"volume\":\"17 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gcbb.70030\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Change Biology Bioenergy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gcbb.70030\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Change Biology Bioenergy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gcbb.70030","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Assessing Feedstock Availability and Economic Feasibility of Utilizing Forest Biomass for Biochar Production in Stationary and Portable Systems in Michigan
The accumulation of small-diameter and low-value trees and logging residues can negatively impact forest health by increasing the risks of pests, diseases, and wildfires. Biochar production presents a potential solution by creating markets for these underutilized resources. However, there is limited information on market dynamics and the influence of subregional conditions on the use of forest biomass for biochar. The study identified potential locations for biochar production and developed procurement zones using delivered wood prices to evaluate biomass availability and biochar application. The minimum selling prices (MSP) for biochar were calculated for local applications to assess the cost savings. Under a baseline scenario with an average delivered biomass price of $23.25 per green ton, stationary facilities produced 71% more biochar than the estimated requirements in the Upper Peninsula (UP) but only 10% more in the Lower Peninsula (LP). Portable units, however, produced less biochar than the required application in both regions, with deficits of 4% in the UP and 50% in the LP. While stationary facilities are more cost-effective and scalable, portable units can procure more biomass and offer greater opportunities for land application of biochar. Despite a lower MSP for stationary facilities, portable units could provide a more economical option by reducing investment costs and risks. The study recommends establishing portable units in the UP and stationary facilities in the LP to optimize forest biomass procurement and biochar production in Michigan. This analysis contributes to understanding resource availability and the potential utilization of forest biomass for biochar in Michigan.
期刊介绍:
GCB Bioenergy is an international journal publishing original research papers, review articles and commentaries that promote understanding of the interface between biological and environmental sciences and the production of fuels directly from plants, algae and waste. The scope of the journal extends to areas outside of biology to policy forum, socioeconomic analyses, technoeconomic analyses and systems analysis. Papers do not need a global change component for consideration for publication, it is viewed as implicit that most bioenergy will be beneficial in avoiding at least a part of the fossil fuel energy that would otherwise be used.
Key areas covered by the journal:
Bioenergy feedstock and bio-oil production: energy crops and algae their management,, genomics, genetic improvements, planting, harvesting, storage, transportation, integrated logistics, production modeling, composition and its modification, pests, diseases and weeds of feedstocks. Manuscripts concerning alternative energy based on biological mimicry are also encouraged (e.g. artificial photosynthesis).
Biological Residues/Co-products: from agricultural production, forestry and plantations (stover, sugar, bio-plastics, etc.), algae processing industries, and municipal sources (MSW).
Bioenergy and the Environment: ecosystem services, carbon mitigation, land use change, life cycle assessment, energy and greenhouse gas balances, water use, water quality, assessment of sustainability, and biodiversity issues.
Bioenergy Socioeconomics: examining the economic viability or social acceptability of crops, crops systems and their processing, including genetically modified organisms [GMOs], health impacts of bioenergy systems.
Bioenergy Policy: legislative developments affecting biofuels and bioenergy.
Bioenergy Systems Analysis: examining biological developments in a whole systems context.