{"title":"性别对结直肠癌发病率的影响:考虑性别机制的影响","authors":"Amalia Martinez , Nadine Hamieh , Hélène Colineaux , Michelle Kelly-Irving , Pascale Grosclaude , Emmanuel Wiernik , Cyrille Delpierre , Sébastien Lamy","doi":"10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Context</h3><div>Differences in colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence between men and women are documented, but the role of gender mechanisms in explaining these disparities remains underexplored. CRC, the third deadliest cancer worldwide, is often analyzed through “biological” sex differences, without a clear distinction between innate and socially acquired factors. Gender mechanisms, including social roles, behaviors, and access to healthcare, may significantly influence CRC risk.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study quantifies the proportion of the effect of gender mechanisms on the relationship between sex assigned at birth and CRC incidence, adopting a social epidemiology approach.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>Using data from the CONSTANCES cohort and the French National Health Insurance database (SNDS), we identified relevant covariates with a Directed Acyclic Graph (DAG). Mediation analyses estimated the contribution of socioeconomic, behavioral, anthropometric and medical factors as gender-related mechanisms.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Men have a higher risk of CRC compared to women (OR: 1.54 [1.33; 1.79]). Men exhibit lower cultural capital, higher social and economic capital, more frequent risk behaviors, and higher BMI. Gender mechanisms account for 30 % of the association between sex assigned at birth and CRC incidence, in the imputed data, and up to 50 % in the complete cases. Among the gender mechanisms, BMI emerged as the main mediator.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study reveals that gender-based health inequalities in CRC incidence are partially explained by differences in exposure to social and behavioral risk factors. These findings underscore the importance of integrating gender dynamics into public health strategies for CRC prevention and intervention, focusing on addressing gender-based risk factor exposure.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49122,"journal":{"name":"Social Science & Medicine","volume":"376 ","pages":"Article 118058"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence of sex on the incidence of colorectal cancer: considering the influence of gender mechanisms\",\"authors\":\"Amalia Martinez , Nadine Hamieh , Hélène Colineaux , Michelle Kelly-Irving , Pascale Grosclaude , Emmanuel Wiernik , Cyrille Delpierre , Sébastien Lamy\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118058\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Context</h3><div>Differences in colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence between men and women are documented, but the role of gender mechanisms in explaining these disparities remains underexplored. CRC, the third deadliest cancer worldwide, is often analyzed through “biological” sex differences, without a clear distinction between innate and socially acquired factors. Gender mechanisms, including social roles, behaviors, and access to healthcare, may significantly influence CRC risk.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study quantifies the proportion of the effect of gender mechanisms on the relationship between sex assigned at birth and CRC incidence, adopting a social epidemiology approach.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>Using data from the CONSTANCES cohort and the French National Health Insurance database (SNDS), we identified relevant covariates with a Directed Acyclic Graph (DAG). Mediation analyses estimated the contribution of socioeconomic, behavioral, anthropometric and medical factors as gender-related mechanisms.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Men have a higher risk of CRC compared to women (OR: 1.54 [1.33; 1.79]). Men exhibit lower cultural capital, higher social and economic capital, more frequent risk behaviors, and higher BMI. Gender mechanisms account for 30 % of the association between sex assigned at birth and CRC incidence, in the imputed data, and up to 50 % in the complete cases. Among the gender mechanisms, BMI emerged as the main mediator.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study reveals that gender-based health inequalities in CRC incidence are partially explained by differences in exposure to social and behavioral risk factors. These findings underscore the importance of integrating gender dynamics into public health strategies for CRC prevention and intervention, focusing on addressing gender-based risk factor exposure.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49122,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social Science & Medicine\",\"volume\":\"376 \",\"pages\":\"Article 118058\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social Science & Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953625003880\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Science & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953625003880","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Influence of sex on the incidence of colorectal cancer: considering the influence of gender mechanisms
Context
Differences in colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence between men and women are documented, but the role of gender mechanisms in explaining these disparities remains underexplored. CRC, the third deadliest cancer worldwide, is often analyzed through “biological” sex differences, without a clear distinction between innate and socially acquired factors. Gender mechanisms, including social roles, behaviors, and access to healthcare, may significantly influence CRC risk.
Objective
This study quantifies the proportion of the effect of gender mechanisms on the relationship between sex assigned at birth and CRC incidence, adopting a social epidemiology approach.
Method
Using data from the CONSTANCES cohort and the French National Health Insurance database (SNDS), we identified relevant covariates with a Directed Acyclic Graph (DAG). Mediation analyses estimated the contribution of socioeconomic, behavioral, anthropometric and medical factors as gender-related mechanisms.
Results
Men have a higher risk of CRC compared to women (OR: 1.54 [1.33; 1.79]). Men exhibit lower cultural capital, higher social and economic capital, more frequent risk behaviors, and higher BMI. Gender mechanisms account for 30 % of the association between sex assigned at birth and CRC incidence, in the imputed data, and up to 50 % in the complete cases. Among the gender mechanisms, BMI emerged as the main mediator.
Conclusion
This study reveals that gender-based health inequalities in CRC incidence are partially explained by differences in exposure to social and behavioral risk factors. These findings underscore the importance of integrating gender dynamics into public health strategies for CRC prevention and intervention, focusing on addressing gender-based risk factor exposure.
期刊介绍:
Social Science & Medicine provides an international and interdisciplinary forum for the dissemination of social science research on health. We publish original research articles (both empirical and theoretical), reviews, position papers and commentaries on health issues, to inform current research, policy and practice in all areas of common interest to social scientists, health practitioners, and policy makers. The journal publishes material relevant to any aspect of health from a wide range of social science disciplines (anthropology, economics, epidemiology, geography, policy, psychology, and sociology), and material relevant to the social sciences from any of the professions concerned with physical and mental health, health care, clinical practice, and health policy and organization. We encourage material which is of general interest to an international readership.