玉米杂草种类检测与识别的深度学习模型

IF 2.5 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY
Everton Castelão Tetila , Gelson Wirti Junior , Gabriel Toshio Hirokawa Higa , Anderson Bessa da Costa , Willian Paraguassu Amorim , Hemerson Pistori , Jayme Garcia Arnal Barbedo
{"title":"玉米杂草种类检测与识别的深度学习模型","authors":"Everton Castelão Tetila ,&nbsp;Gelson Wirti Junior ,&nbsp;Gabriel Toshio Hirokawa Higa ,&nbsp;Anderson Bessa da Costa ,&nbsp;Willian Paraguassu Amorim ,&nbsp;Hemerson Pistori ,&nbsp;Jayme Garcia Arnal Barbedo","doi":"10.1016/j.cropro.2025.107237","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Weed detection and control are important challenges in modern agriculture. Weed infestation can significantly reduce crop yields. The identification of weeds by species, along with their location, is important to reduce production costs and the environmental impact resulting from the use of chemical control across the plantation. In this study, we assessed four deep learning models for detection and recognition of weed species in corn crop. UAV flights were carried out over six corn farming areas at an altitude of 10 meters. Using LabelImg, we labeled almost 10,000 samples of six weed species with high incidence in corn crops. The resulting WEED6C-Dataset was made available for academic purposes. Model assessment was carried out using a 5-fold cross-validation, three metrics for classification evaluation, and six metrics for detection evaluation. Experimental results showed evidence for statistically significant differences between the assessed models. In our experiments, the Faster R-CNN architecture obtained the best results for recall, f-score, RMSE, MAE, R<span><math><msup><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msup></math></span>, mAP50, mAP75 and mAP50-95. On the other hand, the SABL, FoveaBox and YOLOv3 architectures achieved higher precision rates for weed recognition in corn.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10785,"journal":{"name":"Crop Protection","volume":"195 ","pages":"Article 107237"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Deep learning models for detection and recognition of weed species in corn crop\",\"authors\":\"Everton Castelão Tetila ,&nbsp;Gelson Wirti Junior ,&nbsp;Gabriel Toshio Hirokawa Higa ,&nbsp;Anderson Bessa da Costa ,&nbsp;Willian Paraguassu Amorim ,&nbsp;Hemerson Pistori ,&nbsp;Jayme Garcia Arnal Barbedo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cropro.2025.107237\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Weed detection and control are important challenges in modern agriculture. Weed infestation can significantly reduce crop yields. The identification of weeds by species, along with their location, is important to reduce production costs and the environmental impact resulting from the use of chemical control across the plantation. In this study, we assessed four deep learning models for detection and recognition of weed species in corn crop. UAV flights were carried out over six corn farming areas at an altitude of 10 meters. Using LabelImg, we labeled almost 10,000 samples of six weed species with high incidence in corn crops. The resulting WEED6C-Dataset was made available for academic purposes. Model assessment was carried out using a 5-fold cross-validation, three metrics for classification evaluation, and six metrics for detection evaluation. Experimental results showed evidence for statistically significant differences between the assessed models. In our experiments, the Faster R-CNN architecture obtained the best results for recall, f-score, RMSE, MAE, R<span><math><msup><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msup></math></span>, mAP50, mAP75 and mAP50-95. On the other hand, the SABL, FoveaBox and YOLOv3 architectures achieved higher precision rates for weed recognition in corn.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10785,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Crop Protection\",\"volume\":\"195 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107237\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Crop Protection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0261219425001292\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crop Protection","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0261219425001292","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

杂草检测与控制是现代农业面临的重要挑战。杂草丛生可显著降低作物产量。按种类识别杂草及其位置,对于降低生产成本和在整个人工林中使用化学控制所造成的环境影响非常重要。在这项研究中,我们评估了四种用于玉米作物杂草种类检测和识别的深度学习模型。无人机在海拔10米的6个玉米种植区上空进行了飞行。利用LabelImg,我们对玉米作物中高发病率的6种杂草进行了近10000个样本的标记。由此产生的weed6c数据集可用于学术目的。模型评估采用5重交叉验证,3个指标用于分类评估,6个指标用于检测评估。实验结果显示评估模型之间存在统计学上显著差异的证据。在我们的实验中,Faster R-CNN架构在召回率、f-score、RMSE、MAE、R2、mAP50、mAP75和mAP50-95方面获得了最好的结果。另一方面,SABL、FoveaBox和YOLOv3架构在玉米杂草识别方面取得了更高的准确率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Deep learning models for detection and recognition of weed species in corn crop
Weed detection and control are important challenges in modern agriculture. Weed infestation can significantly reduce crop yields. The identification of weeds by species, along with their location, is important to reduce production costs and the environmental impact resulting from the use of chemical control across the plantation. In this study, we assessed four deep learning models for detection and recognition of weed species in corn crop. UAV flights were carried out over six corn farming areas at an altitude of 10 meters. Using LabelImg, we labeled almost 10,000 samples of six weed species with high incidence in corn crops. The resulting WEED6C-Dataset was made available for academic purposes. Model assessment was carried out using a 5-fold cross-validation, three metrics for classification evaluation, and six metrics for detection evaluation. Experimental results showed evidence for statistically significant differences between the assessed models. In our experiments, the Faster R-CNN architecture obtained the best results for recall, f-score, RMSE, MAE, R2, mAP50, mAP75 and mAP50-95. On the other hand, the SABL, FoveaBox and YOLOv3 architectures achieved higher precision rates for weed recognition in corn.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Crop Protection
Crop Protection 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
3.60%
发文量
200
审稿时长
29 days
期刊介绍: The Editors of Crop Protection especially welcome papers describing an interdisciplinary approach showing how different control strategies can be integrated into practical pest management programs, covering high and low input agricultural systems worldwide. Crop Protection particularly emphasizes the practical aspects of control in the field and for protected crops, and includes work which may lead in the near future to more effective control. The journal does not duplicate the many existing excellent biological science journals, which deal mainly with the more fundamental aspects of plant pathology, applied zoology and weed science. Crop Protection covers all practical aspects of pest, disease and weed control, including the following topics: -Abiotic damage- Agronomic control methods- Assessment of pest and disease damage- Molecular methods for the detection and assessment of pests and diseases- Biological control- Biorational pesticides- Control of animal pests of world crops- Control of diseases of crop plants caused by microorganisms- Control of weeds and integrated management- Economic considerations- Effects of plant growth regulators- Environmental benefits of reduced pesticide use- Environmental effects of pesticides- Epidemiology of pests and diseases in relation to control- GM Crops, and genetic engineering applications- Importance and control of postharvest crop losses- Integrated control- Interrelationships and compatibility among different control strategies- Invasive species as they relate to implications for crop protection- Pesticide application methods- Pest management- Phytobiomes for pest and disease control- Resistance management- Sampling and monitoring schemes for diseases, nematodes, pests and weeds.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信