Heather C. Lench , Nazim Asani , Sophia G. North , Kiki Salsedo
{"title":"当无聊来临时:无聊反应的个体差异测量","authors":"Heather C. Lench , Nazim Asani , Sophia G. North , Kiki Salsedo","doi":"10.1016/j.paid.2025.113215","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This investigation develops a measure of individual differences in responses during boredom. Boredom creates motivation to seek new options and opportunities, but those novel activities can be beneficial or detrimental. Therefore, how people respond to boredom has important implications for well-being and functioning. Items were developed by eliciting and coding thoughts and behaviors that occurred during boring experiences, then assessing the relationship of items with one another and an associated construct. The resulting Boredom Responses Scale (BRS) included 8 items representing disengagement strategies and 4 items representing engagement strategies. In Study 1, the BRS demonstrated acceptable reliability and validity in relation to apathy, general emotion regulation, boredom proneness, general self-control, and need for cognition. The BRS also was associated with affect, anxiety symptoms, depression symptoms, and boredom after a boredom manipulation. The BRS scale demonstrated acceptable reliability and validity in Study 2, and additionally predicted worsening negative affect, worsening anxiety symptoms and depression symptoms over time. These relationships held after accounting for boredom proneness, demonstrating incremental validity of the BRS over this widely used measure.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48467,"journal":{"name":"Personality and Individual Differences","volume":"242 ","pages":"Article 113215"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"When boredom settles in: Measurement of individual differences in boredom responses\",\"authors\":\"Heather C. Lench , Nazim Asani , Sophia G. North , Kiki Salsedo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.paid.2025.113215\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This investigation develops a measure of individual differences in responses during boredom. Boredom creates motivation to seek new options and opportunities, but those novel activities can be beneficial or detrimental. Therefore, how people respond to boredom has important implications for well-being and functioning. Items were developed by eliciting and coding thoughts and behaviors that occurred during boring experiences, then assessing the relationship of items with one another and an associated construct. The resulting Boredom Responses Scale (BRS) included 8 items representing disengagement strategies and 4 items representing engagement strategies. In Study 1, the BRS demonstrated acceptable reliability and validity in relation to apathy, general emotion regulation, boredom proneness, general self-control, and need for cognition. The BRS also was associated with affect, anxiety symptoms, depression symptoms, and boredom after a boredom manipulation. The BRS scale demonstrated acceptable reliability and validity in Study 2, and additionally predicted worsening negative affect, worsening anxiety symptoms and depression symptoms over time. These relationships held after accounting for boredom proneness, demonstrating incremental validity of the BRS over this widely used measure.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48467,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Personality and Individual Differences\",\"volume\":\"242 \",\"pages\":\"Article 113215\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Personality and Individual Differences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886925001771\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personality and Individual Differences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886925001771","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
When boredom settles in: Measurement of individual differences in boredom responses
This investigation develops a measure of individual differences in responses during boredom. Boredom creates motivation to seek new options and opportunities, but those novel activities can be beneficial or detrimental. Therefore, how people respond to boredom has important implications for well-being and functioning. Items were developed by eliciting and coding thoughts and behaviors that occurred during boring experiences, then assessing the relationship of items with one another and an associated construct. The resulting Boredom Responses Scale (BRS) included 8 items representing disengagement strategies and 4 items representing engagement strategies. In Study 1, the BRS demonstrated acceptable reliability and validity in relation to apathy, general emotion regulation, boredom proneness, general self-control, and need for cognition. The BRS also was associated with affect, anxiety symptoms, depression symptoms, and boredom after a boredom manipulation. The BRS scale demonstrated acceptable reliability and validity in Study 2, and additionally predicted worsening negative affect, worsening anxiety symptoms and depression symptoms over time. These relationships held after accounting for boredom proneness, demonstrating incremental validity of the BRS over this widely used measure.
期刊介绍:
Personality and Individual Differences is devoted to the publication of articles (experimental, theoretical, review) which aim to integrate as far as possible the major factors of personality with empirical paradigms from experimental, physiological, animal, clinical, educational, criminological or industrial psychology or to seek an explanation for the causes and major determinants of individual differences in concepts derived from these disciplines. The editors are concerned with both genetic and environmental causes, and they are particularly interested in possible interaction effects.