当无聊来临时:无聊反应的个体差异测量

IF 2.6 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Heather C. Lench , Nazim Asani , Sophia G. North , Kiki Salsedo
{"title":"当无聊来临时:无聊反应的个体差异测量","authors":"Heather C. Lench ,&nbsp;Nazim Asani ,&nbsp;Sophia G. North ,&nbsp;Kiki Salsedo","doi":"10.1016/j.paid.2025.113215","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This investigation develops a measure of individual differences in responses during boredom. Boredom creates motivation to seek new options and opportunities, but those novel activities can be beneficial or detrimental. Therefore, how people respond to boredom has important implications for well-being and functioning. Items were developed by eliciting and coding thoughts and behaviors that occurred during boring experiences, then assessing the relationship of items with one another and an associated construct. The resulting Boredom Responses Scale (BRS) included 8 items representing disengagement strategies and 4 items representing engagement strategies. In Study 1, the BRS demonstrated acceptable reliability and validity in relation to apathy, general emotion regulation, boredom proneness, general self-control, and need for cognition. The BRS also was associated with affect, anxiety symptoms, depression symptoms, and boredom after a boredom manipulation. The BRS scale demonstrated acceptable reliability and validity in Study 2, and additionally predicted worsening negative affect, worsening anxiety symptoms and depression symptoms over time. These relationships held after accounting for boredom proneness, demonstrating incremental validity of the BRS over this widely used measure.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48467,"journal":{"name":"Personality and Individual Differences","volume":"242 ","pages":"Article 113215"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"When boredom settles in: Measurement of individual differences in boredom responses\",\"authors\":\"Heather C. Lench ,&nbsp;Nazim Asani ,&nbsp;Sophia G. North ,&nbsp;Kiki Salsedo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.paid.2025.113215\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This investigation develops a measure of individual differences in responses during boredom. Boredom creates motivation to seek new options and opportunities, but those novel activities can be beneficial or detrimental. Therefore, how people respond to boredom has important implications for well-being and functioning. Items were developed by eliciting and coding thoughts and behaviors that occurred during boring experiences, then assessing the relationship of items with one another and an associated construct. The resulting Boredom Responses Scale (BRS) included 8 items representing disengagement strategies and 4 items representing engagement strategies. In Study 1, the BRS demonstrated acceptable reliability and validity in relation to apathy, general emotion regulation, boredom proneness, general self-control, and need for cognition. The BRS also was associated with affect, anxiety symptoms, depression symptoms, and boredom after a boredom manipulation. The BRS scale demonstrated acceptable reliability and validity in Study 2, and additionally predicted worsening negative affect, worsening anxiety symptoms and depression symptoms over time. These relationships held after accounting for boredom proneness, demonstrating incremental validity of the BRS over this widely used measure.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48467,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Personality and Individual Differences\",\"volume\":\"242 \",\"pages\":\"Article 113215\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Personality and Individual Differences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886925001771\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personality and Individual Differences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886925001771","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项调查开发了一种衡量无聊时个体反应差异的方法。无聊产生了寻找新选择和新机会的动力,但这些新奇的活动可能是有益的,也可能是有害的。因此,人们对无聊的反应对幸福感和功能有着重要的影响。项目是通过引出和编码在无聊经历中发生的想法和行为,然后评估项目彼此之间的关系以及相关的构念来开发的。由此产生的无聊反应量表(BRS)包括8个项目代表抽离策略和4个项目代表投入策略。在研究1中,BRS在冷漠、一般情绪调节、无聊倾向、一般自我控制和认知需求方面表现出可接受的信度和效度。BRS还与情绪、焦虑症状、抑郁症状和无聊操作后的无聊感有关。BRS量表在研究2中表现出可接受的信度和效度,并且随着时间的推移,BRS量表还能预测负面情绪、焦虑症状和抑郁症状的恶化。在考虑了无聊倾向后,这些关系保持不变,表明BRS比这种广泛使用的测量方法更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
When boredom settles in: Measurement of individual differences in boredom responses
This investigation develops a measure of individual differences in responses during boredom. Boredom creates motivation to seek new options and opportunities, but those novel activities can be beneficial or detrimental. Therefore, how people respond to boredom has important implications for well-being and functioning. Items were developed by eliciting and coding thoughts and behaviors that occurred during boring experiences, then assessing the relationship of items with one another and an associated construct. The resulting Boredom Responses Scale (BRS) included 8 items representing disengagement strategies and 4 items representing engagement strategies. In Study 1, the BRS demonstrated acceptable reliability and validity in relation to apathy, general emotion regulation, boredom proneness, general self-control, and need for cognition. The BRS also was associated with affect, anxiety symptoms, depression symptoms, and boredom after a boredom manipulation. The BRS scale demonstrated acceptable reliability and validity in Study 2, and additionally predicted worsening negative affect, worsening anxiety symptoms and depression symptoms over time. These relationships held after accounting for boredom proneness, demonstrating incremental validity of the BRS over this widely used measure.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
4.70%
发文量
577
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Personality and Individual Differences is devoted to the publication of articles (experimental, theoretical, review) which aim to integrate as far as possible the major factors of personality with empirical paradigms from experimental, physiological, animal, clinical, educational, criminological or industrial psychology or to seek an explanation for the causes and major determinants of individual differences in concepts derived from these disciplines. The editors are concerned with both genetic and environmental causes, and they are particularly interested in possible interaction effects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信