利用新生儿唾液对先天性巨细胞病毒感染进行普遍筛查

IF 4 3区 医学 Q2 VIROLOGY
Gabriele Halwachs-Baumann , Oliver Wagner , Yarub Salaheddin , Eveline Ziebermayr , Lukas Angleitner-Boubenizek , Georg Grüßenberger , Ulla Folger-Buchegger
{"title":"利用新生儿唾液对先天性巨细胞病毒感染进行普遍筛查","authors":"Gabriele Halwachs-Baumann ,&nbsp;Oliver Wagner ,&nbsp;Yarub Salaheddin ,&nbsp;Eveline Ziebermayr ,&nbsp;Lukas Angleitner-Boubenizek ,&nbsp;Georg Grüßenberger ,&nbsp;Ulla Folger-Buchegger","doi":"10.1016/j.jcv.2025.105800","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Congenital Cytomegalovirus infection (cCMV) is the most common intrauterine infection in developed countries. The diagnostic gold standard is detection of CMV in neonatal urine. Considering difficulties in urine sample collection, saliva is an alternative specimen providing supportive material for early diagnosis and timely intervention.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Aim of this study was to evaluate a universal screening program using saliva as target specimen, and urine as confirmatory material.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Between May 2019 and November 2024, 5168 newborns were screened for CMV shedding in saliva, 45 neonates were tested positive. From 44 neonates a urine sample was examined. Twelve out of forty-four neonates had concordant results (prevalence = 0,232 %) with five newborns showing CMV related symptoms. In saliva, the difference between the Ct-value of the cCMV negative and the cCMV positive group was significant (38.59 vs. 28.56, p-value &lt; 0.0001). At a Ct-value cut-off of 38.8 sensitivity was 100 %, specificity 53.1 %, positive predictive value 44 %, and negative predictive value 100 %. ROC analysis yielded an AUC value of 0.930. The mean virus load in urine was 31,266,663 copies/ml.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>This study reports a prevalence of 0,232 % for cCMV infection in the catchment area of the hospital Steyr. PCR based CMV detection in saliva is a good screening tool, but one must be aware of false positive results, arising from possible contamination. In our cohort CMV positive vaginal or cervical secretion seems more likely being the source of contamination than CMV positive breast milk. The high false positive rate in saliva makes confirmatory testing in urine samples mandatory.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15517,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Virology","volume":"178 ","pages":"Article 105800"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Universal screening for congenital Cytomegalovirus infection using saliva from the neonate\",\"authors\":\"Gabriele Halwachs-Baumann ,&nbsp;Oliver Wagner ,&nbsp;Yarub Salaheddin ,&nbsp;Eveline Ziebermayr ,&nbsp;Lukas Angleitner-Boubenizek ,&nbsp;Georg Grüßenberger ,&nbsp;Ulla Folger-Buchegger\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jcv.2025.105800\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Congenital Cytomegalovirus infection (cCMV) is the most common intrauterine infection in developed countries. The diagnostic gold standard is detection of CMV in neonatal urine. Considering difficulties in urine sample collection, saliva is an alternative specimen providing supportive material for early diagnosis and timely intervention.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Aim of this study was to evaluate a universal screening program using saliva as target specimen, and urine as confirmatory material.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Between May 2019 and November 2024, 5168 newborns were screened for CMV shedding in saliva, 45 neonates were tested positive. From 44 neonates a urine sample was examined. Twelve out of forty-four neonates had concordant results (prevalence = 0,232 %) with five newborns showing CMV related symptoms. In saliva, the difference between the Ct-value of the cCMV negative and the cCMV positive group was significant (38.59 vs. 28.56, p-value &lt; 0.0001). At a Ct-value cut-off of 38.8 sensitivity was 100 %, specificity 53.1 %, positive predictive value 44 %, and negative predictive value 100 %. ROC analysis yielded an AUC value of 0.930. The mean virus load in urine was 31,266,663 copies/ml.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>This study reports a prevalence of 0,232 % for cCMV infection in the catchment area of the hospital Steyr. PCR based CMV detection in saliva is a good screening tool, but one must be aware of false positive results, arising from possible contamination. In our cohort CMV positive vaginal or cervical secretion seems more likely being the source of contamination than CMV positive breast milk. The high false positive rate in saliva makes confirmatory testing in urine samples mandatory.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15517,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Virology\",\"volume\":\"178 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105800\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Virology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1386653225000423\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"VIROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Virology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1386653225000423","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VIROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

先天性巨细胞病毒感染(cCMV)是发达国家最常见的宫内感染。诊断的金标准是新生儿尿液中巨细胞病毒的检测。考虑到尿液样本采集的困难,唾液是一种可替代的样本,为早期诊断和及时干预提供支持材料。目的探讨一种以唾液为目标样本,尿液为确认材料的通用筛查方案。结果2019年5月至2024年11月,对5168名新生儿进行唾液巨细胞病毒脱落筛查,45名新生儿检测呈阳性。对44名新生儿进行了尿样检查。44名新生儿中有12名结果一致(患病率= 0,232%),其中5名新生儿出现巨细胞病毒相关症状。在唾液中,cCMV阴性组和cCMV阳性组的ct值差异有统计学意义(38.59比28.56,p值<;0.0001)。ct值为38.8时,敏感性为100%,特异性为53.1%,阳性预测值为44%,阴性预测值为100%。ROC分析的AUC值为0.930。尿中平均病毒载量为31,266,663拷贝/ml。本研究报告了斯太尔医院集水区cCMV感染率为0,232%。基于PCR的唾液巨细胞病毒检测是一个很好的筛选工具,但必须注意假阳性结果,可能引起污染。在我们的队列中,巨细胞病毒阳性的阴道或宫颈分泌物似乎比巨细胞病毒阳性的母乳更可能是污染源。唾液的高假阳性率使得尿样的确证测试成为强制性的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Universal screening for congenital Cytomegalovirus infection using saliva from the neonate

Background

Congenital Cytomegalovirus infection (cCMV) is the most common intrauterine infection in developed countries. The diagnostic gold standard is detection of CMV in neonatal urine. Considering difficulties in urine sample collection, saliva is an alternative specimen providing supportive material for early diagnosis and timely intervention.

Objectives

Aim of this study was to evaluate a universal screening program using saliva as target specimen, and urine as confirmatory material.

Results

Between May 2019 and November 2024, 5168 newborns were screened for CMV shedding in saliva, 45 neonates were tested positive. From 44 neonates a urine sample was examined. Twelve out of forty-four neonates had concordant results (prevalence = 0,232 %) with five newborns showing CMV related symptoms. In saliva, the difference between the Ct-value of the cCMV negative and the cCMV positive group was significant (38.59 vs. 28.56, p-value < 0.0001). At a Ct-value cut-off of 38.8 sensitivity was 100 %, specificity 53.1 %, positive predictive value 44 %, and negative predictive value 100 %. ROC analysis yielded an AUC value of 0.930. The mean virus load in urine was 31,266,663 copies/ml.

Discussion

This study reports a prevalence of 0,232 % for cCMV infection in the catchment area of the hospital Steyr. PCR based CMV detection in saliva is a good screening tool, but one must be aware of false positive results, arising from possible contamination. In our cohort CMV positive vaginal or cervical secretion seems more likely being the source of contamination than CMV positive breast milk. The high false positive rate in saliva makes confirmatory testing in urine samples mandatory.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Virology
Journal of Clinical Virology 医学-病毒学
CiteScore
22.70
自引率
1.10%
发文量
149
审稿时长
24 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Virology, an esteemed international publication, serves as the official journal for both the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology and The European Society for Clinical Virology. Dedicated to advancing the understanding of human virology in clinical settings, the Journal of Clinical Virology focuses on disseminating research papers and reviews pertaining to the clinical aspects of virology. Its scope encompasses articles discussing diagnostic methodologies and virus-induced clinical conditions, with an emphasis on practicality and relevance to clinical practice. The journal publishes on topics that include: • new diagnostic technologies • nucleic acid amplification and serologic testing • targeted and metagenomic next-generation sequencing • emerging pandemic viral threats • respiratory viruses • transplant viruses • chronic viral infections • cancer-associated viruses • gastrointestinal viruses • central nervous system viruses • one health (excludes animal health)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信