Gabriele Halwachs-Baumann , Oliver Wagner , Yarub Salaheddin , Eveline Ziebermayr , Lukas Angleitner-Boubenizek , Georg Grüßenberger , Ulla Folger-Buchegger
{"title":"利用新生儿唾液对先天性巨细胞病毒感染进行普遍筛查","authors":"Gabriele Halwachs-Baumann , Oliver Wagner , Yarub Salaheddin , Eveline Ziebermayr , Lukas Angleitner-Boubenizek , Georg Grüßenberger , Ulla Folger-Buchegger","doi":"10.1016/j.jcv.2025.105800","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Congenital Cytomegalovirus infection (cCMV) is the most common intrauterine infection in developed countries. The diagnostic gold standard is detection of CMV in neonatal urine. Considering difficulties in urine sample collection, saliva is an alternative specimen providing supportive material for early diagnosis and timely intervention.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Aim of this study was to evaluate a universal screening program using saliva as target specimen, and urine as confirmatory material.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Between May 2019 and November 2024, 5168 newborns were screened for CMV shedding in saliva, 45 neonates were tested positive. From 44 neonates a urine sample was examined. Twelve out of forty-four neonates had concordant results (prevalence = 0,232 %) with five newborns showing CMV related symptoms. In saliva, the difference between the Ct-value of the cCMV negative and the cCMV positive group was significant (38.59 vs. 28.56, p-value < 0.0001). At a Ct-value cut-off of 38.8 sensitivity was 100 %, specificity 53.1 %, positive predictive value 44 %, and negative predictive value 100 %. ROC analysis yielded an AUC value of 0.930. The mean virus load in urine was 31,266,663 copies/ml.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>This study reports a prevalence of 0,232 % for cCMV infection in the catchment area of the hospital Steyr. PCR based CMV detection in saliva is a good screening tool, but one must be aware of false positive results, arising from possible contamination. In our cohort CMV positive vaginal or cervical secretion seems more likely being the source of contamination than CMV positive breast milk. The high false positive rate in saliva makes confirmatory testing in urine samples mandatory.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15517,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Virology","volume":"178 ","pages":"Article 105800"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Universal screening for congenital Cytomegalovirus infection using saliva from the neonate\",\"authors\":\"Gabriele Halwachs-Baumann , Oliver Wagner , Yarub Salaheddin , Eveline Ziebermayr , Lukas Angleitner-Boubenizek , Georg Grüßenberger , Ulla Folger-Buchegger\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jcv.2025.105800\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Congenital Cytomegalovirus infection (cCMV) is the most common intrauterine infection in developed countries. The diagnostic gold standard is detection of CMV in neonatal urine. Considering difficulties in urine sample collection, saliva is an alternative specimen providing supportive material for early diagnosis and timely intervention.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Aim of this study was to evaluate a universal screening program using saliva as target specimen, and urine as confirmatory material.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Between May 2019 and November 2024, 5168 newborns were screened for CMV shedding in saliva, 45 neonates were tested positive. From 44 neonates a urine sample was examined. Twelve out of forty-four neonates had concordant results (prevalence = 0,232 %) with five newborns showing CMV related symptoms. In saliva, the difference between the Ct-value of the cCMV negative and the cCMV positive group was significant (38.59 vs. 28.56, p-value < 0.0001). At a Ct-value cut-off of 38.8 sensitivity was 100 %, specificity 53.1 %, positive predictive value 44 %, and negative predictive value 100 %. ROC analysis yielded an AUC value of 0.930. The mean virus load in urine was 31,266,663 copies/ml.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>This study reports a prevalence of 0,232 % for cCMV infection in the catchment area of the hospital Steyr. PCR based CMV detection in saliva is a good screening tool, but one must be aware of false positive results, arising from possible contamination. In our cohort CMV positive vaginal or cervical secretion seems more likely being the source of contamination than CMV positive breast milk. The high false positive rate in saliva makes confirmatory testing in urine samples mandatory.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15517,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Virology\",\"volume\":\"178 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105800\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Virology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1386653225000423\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"VIROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Virology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1386653225000423","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VIROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Universal screening for congenital Cytomegalovirus infection using saliva from the neonate
Background
Congenital Cytomegalovirus infection (cCMV) is the most common intrauterine infection in developed countries. The diagnostic gold standard is detection of CMV in neonatal urine. Considering difficulties in urine sample collection, saliva is an alternative specimen providing supportive material for early diagnosis and timely intervention.
Objectives
Aim of this study was to evaluate a universal screening program using saliva as target specimen, and urine as confirmatory material.
Results
Between May 2019 and November 2024, 5168 newborns were screened for CMV shedding in saliva, 45 neonates were tested positive. From 44 neonates a urine sample was examined. Twelve out of forty-four neonates had concordant results (prevalence = 0,232 %) with five newborns showing CMV related symptoms. In saliva, the difference between the Ct-value of the cCMV negative and the cCMV positive group was significant (38.59 vs. 28.56, p-value < 0.0001). At a Ct-value cut-off of 38.8 sensitivity was 100 %, specificity 53.1 %, positive predictive value 44 %, and negative predictive value 100 %. ROC analysis yielded an AUC value of 0.930. The mean virus load in urine was 31,266,663 copies/ml.
Discussion
This study reports a prevalence of 0,232 % for cCMV infection in the catchment area of the hospital Steyr. PCR based CMV detection in saliva is a good screening tool, but one must be aware of false positive results, arising from possible contamination. In our cohort CMV positive vaginal or cervical secretion seems more likely being the source of contamination than CMV positive breast milk. The high false positive rate in saliva makes confirmatory testing in urine samples mandatory.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Clinical Virology, an esteemed international publication, serves as the official journal for both the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology and The European Society for Clinical Virology. Dedicated to advancing the understanding of human virology in clinical settings, the Journal of Clinical Virology focuses on disseminating research papers and reviews pertaining to the clinical aspects of virology. Its scope encompasses articles discussing diagnostic methodologies and virus-induced clinical conditions, with an emphasis on practicality and relevance to clinical practice.
The journal publishes on topics that include:
• new diagnostic technologies
• nucleic acid amplification and serologic testing
• targeted and metagenomic next-generation sequencing
• emerging pandemic viral threats
• respiratory viruses
• transplant viruses
• chronic viral infections
• cancer-associated viruses
• gastrointestinal viruses
• central nervous system viruses
• one health (excludes animal health)