Athasit Wongcharoen , Jenn-Kun Kuo , Wei-Cheng Wang , Parinya Ackaradetruangsri , Naratip Sangsai , Pawat Jantasorn , Ukrit Thamma
{"title":"紊流条件下翅片孔周沟槽几何形状对翅片散热器热水力特性的影响","authors":"Athasit Wongcharoen , Jenn-Kun Kuo , Wei-Cheng Wang , Parinya Ackaradetruangsri , Naratip Sangsai , Pawat Jantasorn , Ukrit Thamma","doi":"10.1016/j.csite.2025.106184","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The thermohydraulic performance of perforated pin-fin heat sinks (PPFHS) with different groove geometries around pin-fin perforation circumference is numerically investigated using ANSYS Fluent under turbulent flow conditions with Reynolds numbers (<span><math><mrow><mi>R</mi><mi>e</mi></mrow></math></span>) ranging from 24,484 to 55,088. Four groove geometries—trapezoid, half-circle, rectangle, and triangle—are assessed for their effects on convective heat transfer efficiency, hydraulic resistance, and overall thermohydraulic performance. The groove sizes are designed to maintain a consistent air-solid interfacial surface area to total volume ratio across all configurations. The study finds that the trapezoid-grooved PPFHS exhibits the highest Nusselt number (<span><math><mrow><mi>N</mi><mi>u</mi></mrow></math></span>), achieving improvements of 11.8 %–20.9 % compared to the ungrooved PPFHS over the investigated <span><math><mrow><mi>R</mi><mi>e</mi></mrow></math></span> range. The half-circle, rectangle, and triangle grooves show <span><math><mrow><mi>N</mi><mi>u</mi></mrow></math></span> enhancements of 10.9–20.2 %, 10.9–20.1 %, and 9.87–18.6 %, respectively. Friction factor reductions range from 4.35 to 8.57 %, 4.22–7.71 %, 3.10–6.62 %, and 0.87–5.05 % for the trapezoid, half-circle, rectangle, and triangle grooves, respectively. The thermal performance factor (<span><math><mrow><mi>T</mi><mi>P</mi><mi>F</mi></mrow></math></span>) of the trapezoid-grooved PPFHS is the highest, with improvements of 13.5–24.5 % over the ungrooved design, followed by the half-circle (12.5–23.4 %), rectangle (12.1–22.9 %), and triangle (10.2–20.7 %) grooves. While <span><math><mrow><mi>T</mi><mi>P</mi><mi>F</mi></mrow></math></span> increases with <span><math><mrow><mi>R</mi><mi>e</mi></mrow></math></span>, a diminishing rate of enhancement is observed at higher <span><math><mrow><mi>R</mi><mi>e</mi></mrow></math></span>. The superior performance of the trapezoid groove is attributed to its ability to promote the most efficient airflow through the perforations while maintaining the lowest perimeter-to-cross-sectional area ratio.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9658,"journal":{"name":"Case Studies in Thermal Engineering","volume":"71 ","pages":"Article 106184"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of groove geometry around pin-fin perforation circumference on thermohydraulic behavior of pin-fin heat sinks under turbulent flow\",\"authors\":\"Athasit Wongcharoen , Jenn-Kun Kuo , Wei-Cheng Wang , Parinya Ackaradetruangsri , Naratip Sangsai , Pawat Jantasorn , Ukrit Thamma\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.csite.2025.106184\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The thermohydraulic performance of perforated pin-fin heat sinks (PPFHS) with different groove geometries around pin-fin perforation circumference is numerically investigated using ANSYS Fluent under turbulent flow conditions with Reynolds numbers (<span><math><mrow><mi>R</mi><mi>e</mi></mrow></math></span>) ranging from 24,484 to 55,088. Four groove geometries—trapezoid, half-circle, rectangle, and triangle—are assessed for their effects on convective heat transfer efficiency, hydraulic resistance, and overall thermohydraulic performance. The groove sizes are designed to maintain a consistent air-solid interfacial surface area to total volume ratio across all configurations. The study finds that the trapezoid-grooved PPFHS exhibits the highest Nusselt number (<span><math><mrow><mi>N</mi><mi>u</mi></mrow></math></span>), achieving improvements of 11.8 %–20.9 % compared to the ungrooved PPFHS over the investigated <span><math><mrow><mi>R</mi><mi>e</mi></mrow></math></span> range. The half-circle, rectangle, and triangle grooves show <span><math><mrow><mi>N</mi><mi>u</mi></mrow></math></span> enhancements of 10.9–20.2 %, 10.9–20.1 %, and 9.87–18.6 %, respectively. Friction factor reductions range from 4.35 to 8.57 %, 4.22–7.71 %, 3.10–6.62 %, and 0.87–5.05 % for the trapezoid, half-circle, rectangle, and triangle grooves, respectively. The thermal performance factor (<span><math><mrow><mi>T</mi><mi>P</mi><mi>F</mi></mrow></math></span>) of the trapezoid-grooved PPFHS is the highest, with improvements of 13.5–24.5 % over the ungrooved design, followed by the half-circle (12.5–23.4 %), rectangle (12.1–22.9 %), and triangle (10.2–20.7 %) grooves. While <span><math><mrow><mi>T</mi><mi>P</mi><mi>F</mi></mrow></math></span> increases with <span><math><mrow><mi>R</mi><mi>e</mi></mrow></math></span>, a diminishing rate of enhancement is observed at higher <span><math><mrow><mi>R</mi><mi>e</mi></mrow></math></span>. The superior performance of the trapezoid groove is attributed to its ability to promote the most efficient airflow through the perforations while maintaining the lowest perimeter-to-cross-sectional area ratio.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9658,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Case Studies in Thermal Engineering\",\"volume\":\"71 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106184\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Case Studies in Thermal Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214157X25004447\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"THERMODYNAMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Case Studies in Thermal Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214157X25004447","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"THERMODYNAMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Effects of groove geometry around pin-fin perforation circumference on thermohydraulic behavior of pin-fin heat sinks under turbulent flow
The thermohydraulic performance of perforated pin-fin heat sinks (PPFHS) with different groove geometries around pin-fin perforation circumference is numerically investigated using ANSYS Fluent under turbulent flow conditions with Reynolds numbers () ranging from 24,484 to 55,088. Four groove geometries—trapezoid, half-circle, rectangle, and triangle—are assessed for their effects on convective heat transfer efficiency, hydraulic resistance, and overall thermohydraulic performance. The groove sizes are designed to maintain a consistent air-solid interfacial surface area to total volume ratio across all configurations. The study finds that the trapezoid-grooved PPFHS exhibits the highest Nusselt number (), achieving improvements of 11.8 %–20.9 % compared to the ungrooved PPFHS over the investigated range. The half-circle, rectangle, and triangle grooves show enhancements of 10.9–20.2 %, 10.9–20.1 %, and 9.87–18.6 %, respectively. Friction factor reductions range from 4.35 to 8.57 %, 4.22–7.71 %, 3.10–6.62 %, and 0.87–5.05 % for the trapezoid, half-circle, rectangle, and triangle grooves, respectively. The thermal performance factor () of the trapezoid-grooved PPFHS is the highest, with improvements of 13.5–24.5 % over the ungrooved design, followed by the half-circle (12.5–23.4 %), rectangle (12.1–22.9 %), and triangle (10.2–20.7 %) grooves. While increases with , a diminishing rate of enhancement is observed at higher . The superior performance of the trapezoid groove is attributed to its ability to promote the most efficient airflow through the perforations while maintaining the lowest perimeter-to-cross-sectional area ratio.
期刊介绍:
Case Studies in Thermal Engineering provides a forum for the rapid publication of short, structured Case Studies in Thermal Engineering and related Short Communications. It provides an essential compendium of case studies for researchers and practitioners in the field of thermal engineering and others who are interested in aspects of thermal engineering cases that could affect other engineering processes. The journal not only publishes new and novel case studies, but also provides a forum for the publication of high quality descriptions of classic thermal engineering problems. The scope of the journal includes case studies of thermal engineering problems in components, devices and systems using existing experimental and numerical techniques in the areas of mechanical, aerospace, chemical, medical, thermal management for electronics, heat exchangers, regeneration, solar thermal energy, thermal storage, building energy conservation, and power generation. Case studies of thermal problems in other areas will also be considered.