迈向绿色船舶推进:小型船舶LPG和电池-电力系统的生命周期比较评估

IF 4.8 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 OCEANOGRAPHY
Jeong Kuk Kim , Jae-Hyuk Choi , Won-Ju Lee , Siljung Yeo
{"title":"迈向绿色船舶推进:小型船舶LPG和电池-电力系统的生命周期比较评估","authors":"Jeong Kuk Kim ,&nbsp;Jae-Hyuk Choi ,&nbsp;Won-Ju Lee ,&nbsp;Siljung Yeo","doi":"10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2025.107702","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study assesses three eco-friendly propulsion systems for small-to-medium fishing vessels: liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) generator engine motor propulsion system (LPG G/E MPS), LPG main engine direct propulsion system (LPG M/E DPS), and battery electric motor propulsion system (battery electric MPS). Using life cycle assessment (LCA), life cycle cost assessment (LCCA), and a fuzzy technique, the environmental, economic, and technical impacts of each system are evaluated within the context of the power production structure of South Korea. The results show that LPG M/E DPS are a viable alternative to traditional fuels, with lower greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions than battery systems due to the fossil fuel-heavy electricity grid in South Korea. Additionally, transitioning the hull material from glass fiber-reinforced plastic (GFRP) to aluminum reduces both emissions and costs over the long term. This study not only highlights the necessity for regional considerations in adopting green maritime technologies but also demonstrates the potential for significant environmental and economic benefits through informed propulsion system selection.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54698,"journal":{"name":"Ocean & Coastal Management","volume":"267 ","pages":"Article 107702"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Towards green marine propulsion: comparative lifecycle evaluation of LPG and battery-electric systems for small vessels\",\"authors\":\"Jeong Kuk Kim ,&nbsp;Jae-Hyuk Choi ,&nbsp;Won-Ju Lee ,&nbsp;Siljung Yeo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2025.107702\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study assesses three eco-friendly propulsion systems for small-to-medium fishing vessels: liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) generator engine motor propulsion system (LPG G/E MPS), LPG main engine direct propulsion system (LPG M/E DPS), and battery electric motor propulsion system (battery electric MPS). Using life cycle assessment (LCA), life cycle cost assessment (LCCA), and a fuzzy technique, the environmental, economic, and technical impacts of each system are evaluated within the context of the power production structure of South Korea. The results show that LPG M/E DPS are a viable alternative to traditional fuels, with lower greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions than battery systems due to the fossil fuel-heavy electricity grid in South Korea. Additionally, transitioning the hull material from glass fiber-reinforced plastic (GFRP) to aluminum reduces both emissions and costs over the long term. This study not only highlights the necessity for regional considerations in adopting green maritime technologies but also demonstrates the potential for significant environmental and economic benefits through informed propulsion system selection.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54698,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ocean & Coastal Management\",\"volume\":\"267 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107702\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ocean & Coastal Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0964569125001644\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OCEANOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ocean & Coastal Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0964569125001644","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OCEANOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究评估了中小型渔船的三种环保推进系统:液化石油气(LPG)发电机发动机推进系统(LPG G/E MPS)、液化石油气主机直接推进系统(LPG M/E DPS)和电池电动机推进系统(电池电动MPS)。使用生命周期评估(LCA)、生命周期成本评估(LCCA)和模糊技术,在韩国电力生产结构的背景下评估每个系统的环境、经济和技术影响。结果表明,LPG M/E DPS是一种可行的传统燃料替代品,由于韩国的电网以化石燃料为主,其温室气体(GHG)排放量低于电池系统。此外,从长期来看,将船体材料从玻璃纤维增强塑料(GFRP)转变为铝可以减少排放和成本。这项研究不仅强调了在采用绿色海事技术时考虑区域因素的必要性,而且还展示了通过明智的推进系统选择带来重大环境和经济效益的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Towards green marine propulsion: comparative lifecycle evaluation of LPG and battery-electric systems for small vessels
This study assesses three eco-friendly propulsion systems for small-to-medium fishing vessels: liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) generator engine motor propulsion system (LPG G/E MPS), LPG main engine direct propulsion system (LPG M/E DPS), and battery electric motor propulsion system (battery electric MPS). Using life cycle assessment (LCA), life cycle cost assessment (LCCA), and a fuzzy technique, the environmental, economic, and technical impacts of each system are evaluated within the context of the power production structure of South Korea. The results show that LPG M/E DPS are a viable alternative to traditional fuels, with lower greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions than battery systems due to the fossil fuel-heavy electricity grid in South Korea. Additionally, transitioning the hull material from glass fiber-reinforced plastic (GFRP) to aluminum reduces both emissions and costs over the long term. This study not only highlights the necessity for regional considerations in adopting green maritime technologies but also demonstrates the potential for significant environmental and economic benefits through informed propulsion system selection.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ocean & Coastal Management
Ocean & Coastal Management 环境科学-海洋学
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
15.20%
发文量
321
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Ocean & Coastal Management is the leading international journal dedicated to the study of all aspects of ocean and coastal management from the global to local levels. We publish rigorously peer-reviewed manuscripts from all disciplines, and inter-/trans-disciplinary and co-designed research, but all submissions must make clear the relevance to management and/or governance issues relevant to the sustainable development and conservation of oceans and coasts. Comparative studies (from sub-national to trans-national cases, and other management / policy arenas) are encouraged, as are studies that critically assess current management practices and governance approaches. Submissions involving robust analysis, development of theory, and improvement of management practice are especially welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信