对全球LULC地图的评估,以估计迁徙水鸟沿其飞行路线的栖息地利用

IF 4.9 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Mariëlle L. van Toor , Aurélie Davranche , Gabriel Delaunay , Clément Murgue , Jonas Waldenström , Céline Arzel
{"title":"对全球LULC地图的评估,以估计迁徙水鸟沿其飞行路线的栖息地利用","authors":"Mariëlle L. van Toor ,&nbsp;Aurélie Davranche ,&nbsp;Gabriel Delaunay ,&nbsp;Clément Murgue ,&nbsp;Jonas Waldenström ,&nbsp;Céline Arzel","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Global products of land use and land cover (LULC) provide maps with a consistent classification, thereby allowing for comparisons of resource and habitat use of species over large spatial scales. While global LULCs tend to be evaluated extensively, the distribution ranges of species can extend into remote areas that are hard to access for ground truthing. It is unclear how adequate global LULCs are for mapping habitat of long-distance migrants throughout their entire range. Here, we investigated whether different global LULCs could successfully capture the known preferences of a migratory wetland specialist, the Eurasian wigeon (<em>Mareca penelope</em>), along the East Atlantic flyway. We evaluated how well five different global LULC products captured known wigeon habitat preferences using remote tracking data, and tested whether a further classification based on wetland expert knowledge can improve on their performance. We found that average performance of global LULC products varied greatly, with ESA WorldCover performing best with a 94% correspondence to wigeon habitat. All products performed best in the Tundra biome, and worse in Boreal as well as Temperate forests. In the latter areas, our wetland expert LULC classification provided improved results by explicitly considering small and temporary wetlands, and wetlands underneath vegetation. Overall, habitat use of habitat specialists can inform us about habitat types that are currently not considered in large-scale LULC maps. We suggest LULC mapping methods integrate information from tracking of wetland specialists for a better detection of small and temporary wetlands on a global scale.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55375,"journal":{"name":"Biological Conservation","volume":"307 ","pages":"Article 111152"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An evaluation of global LULC maps for the estimation of habitat use of a declining migratory waterbird along its flyway\",\"authors\":\"Mariëlle L. van Toor ,&nbsp;Aurélie Davranche ,&nbsp;Gabriel Delaunay ,&nbsp;Clément Murgue ,&nbsp;Jonas Waldenström ,&nbsp;Céline Arzel\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111152\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Global products of land use and land cover (LULC) provide maps with a consistent classification, thereby allowing for comparisons of resource and habitat use of species over large spatial scales. While global LULCs tend to be evaluated extensively, the distribution ranges of species can extend into remote areas that are hard to access for ground truthing. It is unclear how adequate global LULCs are for mapping habitat of long-distance migrants throughout their entire range. Here, we investigated whether different global LULCs could successfully capture the known preferences of a migratory wetland specialist, the Eurasian wigeon (<em>Mareca penelope</em>), along the East Atlantic flyway. We evaluated how well five different global LULC products captured known wigeon habitat preferences using remote tracking data, and tested whether a further classification based on wetland expert knowledge can improve on their performance. We found that average performance of global LULC products varied greatly, with ESA WorldCover performing best with a 94% correspondence to wigeon habitat. All products performed best in the Tundra biome, and worse in Boreal as well as Temperate forests. In the latter areas, our wetland expert LULC classification provided improved results by explicitly considering small and temporary wetlands, and wetlands underneath vegetation. Overall, habitat use of habitat specialists can inform us about habitat types that are currently not considered in large-scale LULC maps. We suggest LULC mapping methods integrate information from tracking of wetland specialists for a better detection of small and temporary wetlands on a global scale.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55375,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biological Conservation\",\"volume\":\"307 \",\"pages\":\"Article 111152\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biological Conservation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006320725001892\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006320725001892","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

全球土地利用和土地覆盖产品(LULC)提供具有一致分类的地图,从而允许在大空间尺度上比较物种的资源和栖息地利用。虽然全球土地利用价值往往被广泛评估,但物种的分布范围可以延伸到难以进入的偏远地区进行实地调查。目前尚不清楚全球lulc是否足够用于绘制长途迁徙者在其整个范围内的栖息地。在这里,我们研究了不同的全球lulc是否能够成功地捕捉到迁徙湿地专家——欧亚飞鹰(Mareca penelope)沿着东大西洋飞行路线的已知偏好。我们评估了五种不同的全球LULC产品如何利用远程跟踪数据捕获已知的鸟类栖息地偏好,并测试了基于湿地专家知识的进一步分类是否可以提高它们的性能。我们发现全球LULC产品的平均性能差异很大,ESA WorldCover表现最好,与wigeon栖息地的对应度为94%。所有产品在冻土带生物群落中表现最好,在北方森林和温带森林中表现较差。在后一类地区,我们的湿地专家LULC分类通过明确考虑小型湿地和临时湿地以及植被下湿地,提供了更好的结果。总的来说,栖息地专家的栖息地利用可以告诉我们目前在大规模的土地利用变化规律地图中没有考虑到的栖息地类型。我们建议LULC制图方法整合湿地专家的跟踪信息,以便更好地在全球范围内检测小型和临时湿地。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

An evaluation of global LULC maps for the estimation of habitat use of a declining migratory waterbird along its flyway

An evaluation of global LULC maps for the estimation of habitat use of a declining migratory waterbird along its flyway
Global products of land use and land cover (LULC) provide maps with a consistent classification, thereby allowing for comparisons of resource and habitat use of species over large spatial scales. While global LULCs tend to be evaluated extensively, the distribution ranges of species can extend into remote areas that are hard to access for ground truthing. It is unclear how adequate global LULCs are for mapping habitat of long-distance migrants throughout their entire range. Here, we investigated whether different global LULCs could successfully capture the known preferences of a migratory wetland specialist, the Eurasian wigeon (Mareca penelope), along the East Atlantic flyway. We evaluated how well five different global LULC products captured known wigeon habitat preferences using remote tracking data, and tested whether a further classification based on wetland expert knowledge can improve on their performance. We found that average performance of global LULC products varied greatly, with ESA WorldCover performing best with a 94% correspondence to wigeon habitat. All products performed best in the Tundra biome, and worse in Boreal as well as Temperate forests. In the latter areas, our wetland expert LULC classification provided improved results by explicitly considering small and temporary wetlands, and wetlands underneath vegetation. Overall, habitat use of habitat specialists can inform us about habitat types that are currently not considered in large-scale LULC maps. We suggest LULC mapping methods integrate information from tracking of wetland specialists for a better detection of small and temporary wetlands on a global scale.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biological Conservation
Biological Conservation 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
3.40%
发文量
295
审稿时长
61 days
期刊介绍: Biological Conservation is an international leading journal in the discipline of conservation biology. The journal publishes articles spanning a diverse range of fields that contribute to the biological, sociological, and economic dimensions of conservation and natural resource management. The primary aim of Biological Conservation is the publication of high-quality papers that advance the science and practice of conservation, or which demonstrate the application of conservation principles for natural resource management and policy. Therefore it will be of interest to a broad international readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信