探索成人身体畸形障碍症状的感知障碍与治疗的相关性:比较心理治疗和在线干预

IF 3.4 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Katharina Bosbach, Johanna Schulte, Alexandra Martin
{"title":"探索成人身体畸形障碍症状的感知障碍与治疗的相关性:比较心理治疗和在线干预","authors":"Katharina Bosbach,&nbsp;Johanna Schulte,&nbsp;Alexandra Martin","doi":"10.1016/j.beth.2024.10.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Although individuals facing Body Dysmorphic Disorder (BDD) endure considerable levels of distress, they often do not engage in empirically effective cognitive-behavioral therapy. Identified barriers to seeking treatment include logistical challenges, shame and stigmatization, and pessimistic expectations of mental health interventions associated with a lack of insight into having a psychological issue. This study investigates the relevance of these perceived treatment barriers for face-to-face therapy and for online interventions as a potentially accessible alternative or entry to traditional psychotherapy. Through an online survey involving 321 participants (comprising 239 with elevated BDD symptoms and 82 with self-reported probable BDD), we utilize the Barriers to Treatment Questionnaire to assess different perceived barriers. A comparative analysis is conducted to contrast the perceived relevance of barriers to psychotherapy with those reported for online interventions. As a result, perceived barriers to psychotherapy are most prominent in feelings of shame and fear of stigmatization, followed by logistical challenges and negative treatment expectations, and again followed by format-related concerns. Overall perceived barriers to online interventions are lower, though concerns related to the intervention format, such as data security concerns, become more pronounced. Notably, shame and stigmatization remain central factors in both contexts. When offering psychological help to individuals with BDD, the aspects of shame and negative attitudes toward seeking psychological help should be primarily addressed. Considering all their advantages, online interventions should continue to be utilized for BDD, to improve the treatment situation, but it should be noted that this treatment format is not without challenges.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48359,"journal":{"name":"Behavior Therapy","volume":"56 3","pages":"Pages 618-633"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the Relevance of Perceived Barriers to Treatment in Adults With Body Dysmorphic Disorder Symptoms: Comparing Psychotherapy and Online Interventions\",\"authors\":\"Katharina Bosbach,&nbsp;Johanna Schulte,&nbsp;Alexandra Martin\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.beth.2024.10.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Although individuals facing Body Dysmorphic Disorder (BDD) endure considerable levels of distress, they often do not engage in empirically effective cognitive-behavioral therapy. Identified barriers to seeking treatment include logistical challenges, shame and stigmatization, and pessimistic expectations of mental health interventions associated with a lack of insight into having a psychological issue. This study investigates the relevance of these perceived treatment barriers for face-to-face therapy and for online interventions as a potentially accessible alternative or entry to traditional psychotherapy. Through an online survey involving 321 participants (comprising 239 with elevated BDD symptoms and 82 with self-reported probable BDD), we utilize the Barriers to Treatment Questionnaire to assess different perceived barriers. A comparative analysis is conducted to contrast the perceived relevance of barriers to psychotherapy with those reported for online interventions. As a result, perceived barriers to psychotherapy are most prominent in feelings of shame and fear of stigmatization, followed by logistical challenges and negative treatment expectations, and again followed by format-related concerns. Overall perceived barriers to online interventions are lower, though concerns related to the intervention format, such as data security concerns, become more pronounced. Notably, shame and stigmatization remain central factors in both contexts. When offering psychological help to individuals with BDD, the aspects of shame and negative attitudes toward seeking psychological help should be primarily addressed. Considering all their advantages, online interventions should continue to be utilized for BDD, to improve the treatment situation, but it should be noted that this treatment format is not without challenges.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48359,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Behavior Therapy\",\"volume\":\"56 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 618-633\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Behavior Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0005789424001497\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavior Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0005789424001497","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然个体面对身体畸形障碍(BDD)忍受相当程度的痛苦,他们往往不从事经验有效的认知行为治疗。已确定的寻求治疗的障碍包括后勤挑战、羞耻和污名化,以及对与缺乏对心理问题的洞察力相关的精神卫生干预措施的悲观期望。本研究调查了这些感知到的治疗障碍与面对面治疗和在线干预的相关性,作为传统心理治疗的潜在替代或进入。通过一项涉及321名参与者的在线调查(其中239名BDD症状升高,82名自我报告可能有BDD),我们利用治疗障碍问卷来评估不同的感知障碍。进行了比较分析,以对比心理治疗障碍与在线干预报告的障碍的感知相关性。因此,心理治疗的感知障碍最突出的是羞耻感和对污名化的恐惧,其次是后勤挑战和消极的治疗期望,然后是与格式相关的担忧。总体而言,在线干预的感知障碍较低,尽管与干预形式相关的担忧(如数据安全问题)变得更加明显。值得注意的是,在这两种情况下,羞耻和污名化仍然是核心因素。在为BDD患者提供心理帮助时,应该首先解决羞耻感和寻求心理帮助的消极态度。考虑到在线干预的所有优势,在线干预应该继续用于BDD,以改善治疗情况,但应该注意的是,这种治疗形式并非没有挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring the Relevance of Perceived Barriers to Treatment in Adults With Body Dysmorphic Disorder Symptoms: Comparing Psychotherapy and Online Interventions
Although individuals facing Body Dysmorphic Disorder (BDD) endure considerable levels of distress, they often do not engage in empirically effective cognitive-behavioral therapy. Identified barriers to seeking treatment include logistical challenges, shame and stigmatization, and pessimistic expectations of mental health interventions associated with a lack of insight into having a psychological issue. This study investigates the relevance of these perceived treatment barriers for face-to-face therapy and for online interventions as a potentially accessible alternative or entry to traditional psychotherapy. Through an online survey involving 321 participants (comprising 239 with elevated BDD symptoms and 82 with self-reported probable BDD), we utilize the Barriers to Treatment Questionnaire to assess different perceived barriers. A comparative analysis is conducted to contrast the perceived relevance of barriers to psychotherapy with those reported for online interventions. As a result, perceived barriers to psychotherapy are most prominent in feelings of shame and fear of stigmatization, followed by logistical challenges and negative treatment expectations, and again followed by format-related concerns. Overall perceived barriers to online interventions are lower, though concerns related to the intervention format, such as data security concerns, become more pronounced. Notably, shame and stigmatization remain central factors in both contexts. When offering psychological help to individuals with BDD, the aspects of shame and negative attitudes toward seeking psychological help should be primarily addressed. Considering all their advantages, online interventions should continue to be utilized for BDD, to improve the treatment situation, but it should be noted that this treatment format is not without challenges.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Behavior Therapy
Behavior Therapy Multiple-
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
2.70%
发文量
113
审稿时长
121 days
期刊介绍: Behavior Therapy is a quarterly international journal devoted to the application of the behavioral and cognitive sciences to the conceptualization, assessment, and treatment of psychopathology and related clinical problems. It is intended for mental health professionals and students from all related disciplines who wish to remain current in these areas and provides a vehicle for scientist-practitioners and clinical scientists to report the results of their original empirical research. Although the major emphasis is placed upon empirical research, methodological and theoretical papers as well as evaluative reviews of the literature will also be published. Controlled single-case designs and clinical replication series are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信