从pm2.5结合的多环芳烃中提炼源特异性肺癌风险评估:整合基于成分的效力因子和机器学习在中国宁波

IF 6.1 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Lord Famiyeh , Ke Chen , Fiseha Berhanu Tesema , Celeb Kelly , Dongsheng Ji , Hang Xiao , Lei Tong , Zongshuang Wang , Jun He
{"title":"从pm2.5结合的多环芳烃中提炼源特异性肺癌风险评估:整合基于成分的效力因子和机器学习在中国宁波","authors":"Lord Famiyeh ,&nbsp;Ke Chen ,&nbsp;Fiseha Berhanu Tesema ,&nbsp;Celeb Kelly ,&nbsp;Dongsheng Ji ,&nbsp;Hang Xiao ,&nbsp;Lei Tong ,&nbsp;Zongshuang Wang ,&nbsp;Jun He","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoenv.2025.118174","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The component-based potency factor approach, combined with benzo[<em>a</em>]pyrene (BaP) unit risk values from the World Health Organization (WHO), is commonly used to assess lung excess cancer risk (LECR) from polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). However, this method may overestimate LECR, particularly when highly carcinogenic PAHs are included. In this study, we employed BaP unit risk values from both the WHO and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to estimate LECR in Ningbo, China, revealing that incorporating high-carcinogenic PAHs into the component-based potency factor approach, along with WHO unit risk factors, leads to an overestimation of LECR by more than tenfold. We identified a moderate PAH exposure risk level (&gt;1.0 ×10⁻⁶) in Ningbo and used advanced machine learning (ML) algorithms, random forest (RF), extremely randomized trees (ERT), and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), to improve the accuracy of source-specific LECR assessments. ERT emerged as the most robust algorithm, identifying industrial emissions, coal combustion, and gasoline engine exhaust as the primary contributors to elevated LECR in Ningbo. This study underscores the need for precise, source-specific LECR estimation to effectively mitigate PAH pollution and reduce lung cancer risks. By integrating ML techniques into risk assessment methodologies, we provide a robust framework for global application, enhancing public health protection. Our findings also highlight the importance of refining risk evaluation strategies and pave the way for future research to validate and adapt these models in diverse environmental settings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":303,"journal":{"name":"Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety","volume":"297 ","pages":"Article 118174"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Refining source-specific lung cancer risk assessment from PM2.5-bound PAHs: Integrating component-based potency factors and machine learning in Ningbo, China\",\"authors\":\"Lord Famiyeh ,&nbsp;Ke Chen ,&nbsp;Fiseha Berhanu Tesema ,&nbsp;Celeb Kelly ,&nbsp;Dongsheng Ji ,&nbsp;Hang Xiao ,&nbsp;Lei Tong ,&nbsp;Zongshuang Wang ,&nbsp;Jun He\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecoenv.2025.118174\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The component-based potency factor approach, combined with benzo[<em>a</em>]pyrene (BaP) unit risk values from the World Health Organization (WHO), is commonly used to assess lung excess cancer risk (LECR) from polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). However, this method may overestimate LECR, particularly when highly carcinogenic PAHs are included. In this study, we employed BaP unit risk values from both the WHO and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to estimate LECR in Ningbo, China, revealing that incorporating high-carcinogenic PAHs into the component-based potency factor approach, along with WHO unit risk factors, leads to an overestimation of LECR by more than tenfold. We identified a moderate PAH exposure risk level (&gt;1.0 ×10⁻⁶) in Ningbo and used advanced machine learning (ML) algorithms, random forest (RF), extremely randomized trees (ERT), and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), to improve the accuracy of source-specific LECR assessments. ERT emerged as the most robust algorithm, identifying industrial emissions, coal combustion, and gasoline engine exhaust as the primary contributors to elevated LECR in Ningbo. This study underscores the need for precise, source-specific LECR estimation to effectively mitigate PAH pollution and reduce lung cancer risks. By integrating ML techniques into risk assessment methodologies, we provide a robust framework for global application, enhancing public health protection. Our findings also highlight the importance of refining risk evaluation strategies and pave the way for future research to validate and adapt these models in diverse environmental settings.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":303,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety\",\"volume\":\"297 \",\"pages\":\"Article 118174\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014765132500510X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014765132500510X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

基于组分的效力因子方法,结合世界卫生组织(WHO)的苯并[a]芘(BaP)单位风险值,通常用于评估多环芳烃(PAHs)造成的肺癌过量风险(LECR)。然而,这种方法可能高估LECR,特别是当高致癌性多环芳烃被包括在内时。在这项研究中,我们使用了来自世界卫生组织和美国环境保护署(EPA)的BaP单位风险值来估计中国宁波市的LECR,结果表明,将高致癌性多环芳烃纳入基于成分的效价因子方法,以及世界卫生组织的单位风险因素,导致LECR高估了十倍以上。我们在宁波市确定了中等多环烃暴露风险水平(>1.0 ×10⁻26),并使用先进的机器学习(ML)算法、随机森林(RF)、极端随机树(ERT)和极端梯度增强(XGBoost)来提高源特异性LECR评估的准确性。ERT是最稳健的算法,确定工业排放、煤炭燃烧和汽油发动机尾气是宁波市LECR升高的主要原因。这项研究强调了精确的、源特异性的LECR估计的必要性,以有效减轻多环芳烃污染并降低肺癌风险。通过将机器学习技术整合到风险评估方法中,我们为全球应用提供了一个强大的框架,加强了公共卫生保护。我们的研究结果还强调了完善风险评估策略的重要性,并为未来的研究铺平了道路,以便在不同的环境环境中验证和调整这些模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Refining source-specific lung cancer risk assessment from PM2.5-bound PAHs: Integrating component-based potency factors and machine learning in Ningbo, China
The component-based potency factor approach, combined with benzo[a]pyrene (BaP) unit risk values from the World Health Organization (WHO), is commonly used to assess lung excess cancer risk (LECR) from polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). However, this method may overestimate LECR, particularly when highly carcinogenic PAHs are included. In this study, we employed BaP unit risk values from both the WHO and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to estimate LECR in Ningbo, China, revealing that incorporating high-carcinogenic PAHs into the component-based potency factor approach, along with WHO unit risk factors, leads to an overestimation of LECR by more than tenfold. We identified a moderate PAH exposure risk level (>1.0 ×10⁻⁶) in Ningbo and used advanced machine learning (ML) algorithms, random forest (RF), extremely randomized trees (ERT), and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), to improve the accuracy of source-specific LECR assessments. ERT emerged as the most robust algorithm, identifying industrial emissions, coal combustion, and gasoline engine exhaust as the primary contributors to elevated LECR in Ningbo. This study underscores the need for precise, source-specific LECR estimation to effectively mitigate PAH pollution and reduce lung cancer risks. By integrating ML techniques into risk assessment methodologies, we provide a robust framework for global application, enhancing public health protection. Our findings also highlight the importance of refining risk evaluation strategies and pave the way for future research to validate and adapt these models in diverse environmental settings.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
5.90%
发文量
1234
审稿时长
88 days
期刊介绍: Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety is a multi-disciplinary journal that focuses on understanding the exposure and effects of environmental contamination on organisms including human health. The scope of the journal covers three main themes. The topics within these themes, indicated below, include (but are not limited to) the following: Ecotoxicology、Environmental Chemistry、Environmental Safety etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信