Yvette Karvay, Julia Yermash, Tatyana Bidopia, Natasha L. Burke
{"title":"检查体重状态标准作为神经性厌食症伤害和种族/民族差异的延续者","authors":"Yvette Karvay, Julia Yermash, Tatyana Bidopia, Natasha L. Burke","doi":"10.1016/j.eatbeh.2025.101984","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Anorexia Nervosa is distinguished from a similar - if not identical - disorder, atypical Anorexia Nervosa, based on weight status. Atypical Anorexia Nervosa is diagnosed when, “despite significant weight loss, [an] individual’s weight is within or above the normal range.” The current scholarly commentary grapples with the historical, biological, and psychosocial flaws inherently entangled in utilizing weight status (and its standardized metrics – i.e., Body Mass Index) as proxies for dietary restriction and health status. We briefly synthesize evidence suggesting that utilization of weight status to differentiate Anorexia Nervosa and Atypical Anorexia Nervosa perpetuates systemic and structural health inequities for individuals with marginalized racial and ethnic identities. This commentary aims to spark discussion on the lack of utility in maintaining two seemingly identical disorders at the cost of perpetuating harm toward historically marginalized groups.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11476,"journal":{"name":"Eating behaviors","volume":"57 ","pages":"Article 101984"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Examining the weight status criterion as a perpetuator of harm and racial/ethnic disparities in anorexia nervosa\",\"authors\":\"Yvette Karvay, Julia Yermash, Tatyana Bidopia, Natasha L. Burke\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eatbeh.2025.101984\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Anorexia Nervosa is distinguished from a similar - if not identical - disorder, atypical Anorexia Nervosa, based on weight status. Atypical Anorexia Nervosa is diagnosed when, “despite significant weight loss, [an] individual’s weight is within or above the normal range.” The current scholarly commentary grapples with the historical, biological, and psychosocial flaws inherently entangled in utilizing weight status (and its standardized metrics – i.e., Body Mass Index) as proxies for dietary restriction and health status. We briefly synthesize evidence suggesting that utilization of weight status to differentiate Anorexia Nervosa and Atypical Anorexia Nervosa perpetuates systemic and structural health inequities for individuals with marginalized racial and ethnic identities. This commentary aims to spark discussion on the lack of utility in maintaining two seemingly identical disorders at the cost of perpetuating harm toward historically marginalized groups.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11476,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Eating behaviors\",\"volume\":\"57 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101984\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Eating behaviors\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1471015325000443\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eating behaviors","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1471015325000443","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Examining the weight status criterion as a perpetuator of harm and racial/ethnic disparities in anorexia nervosa
Anorexia Nervosa is distinguished from a similar - if not identical - disorder, atypical Anorexia Nervosa, based on weight status. Atypical Anorexia Nervosa is diagnosed when, “despite significant weight loss, [an] individual’s weight is within or above the normal range.” The current scholarly commentary grapples with the historical, biological, and psychosocial flaws inherently entangled in utilizing weight status (and its standardized metrics – i.e., Body Mass Index) as proxies for dietary restriction and health status. We briefly synthesize evidence suggesting that utilization of weight status to differentiate Anorexia Nervosa and Atypical Anorexia Nervosa perpetuates systemic and structural health inequities for individuals with marginalized racial and ethnic identities. This commentary aims to spark discussion on the lack of utility in maintaining two seemingly identical disorders at the cost of perpetuating harm toward historically marginalized groups.
期刊介绍:
Eating Behaviors is an international peer-reviewed scientific journal publishing human research on the etiology, prevention, and treatment of obesity, binge eating, and eating disorders in adults and children. Studies related to the promotion of healthy eating patterns to treat or prevent medical conditions (e.g., hypertension, diabetes mellitus, cancer) are also acceptable. Two types of manuscripts are encouraged: (1) Descriptive studies establishing functional relationships between eating behaviors and social, cognitive, environmental, attitudinal, emotional or biochemical factors; (2) Clinical outcome research evaluating the efficacy of prevention or treatment protocols.