检查体重状态标准作为神经性厌食症伤害和种族/民族差异的延续者

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Yvette Karvay, Julia Yermash, Tatyana Bidopia, Natasha L. Burke
{"title":"检查体重状态标准作为神经性厌食症伤害和种族/民族差异的延续者","authors":"Yvette Karvay,&nbsp;Julia Yermash,&nbsp;Tatyana Bidopia,&nbsp;Natasha L. Burke","doi":"10.1016/j.eatbeh.2025.101984","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Anorexia Nervosa is distinguished from a similar - if not identical - disorder, atypical Anorexia Nervosa, based on weight status. Atypical Anorexia Nervosa is diagnosed when, “despite significant weight loss, [an] individual’s weight is within or above the normal range.” The current scholarly commentary grapples with the historical, biological, and psychosocial flaws inherently entangled in utilizing weight status (and its standardized metrics – i.e., Body Mass Index) as proxies for dietary restriction and health status. We briefly synthesize evidence suggesting that utilization of weight status to differentiate Anorexia Nervosa and Atypical Anorexia Nervosa perpetuates systemic and structural health inequities for individuals with marginalized racial and ethnic identities. This commentary aims to spark discussion on the lack of utility in maintaining two seemingly identical disorders at the cost of perpetuating harm toward historically marginalized groups.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11476,"journal":{"name":"Eating behaviors","volume":"57 ","pages":"Article 101984"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Examining the weight status criterion as a perpetuator of harm and racial/ethnic disparities in anorexia nervosa\",\"authors\":\"Yvette Karvay,&nbsp;Julia Yermash,&nbsp;Tatyana Bidopia,&nbsp;Natasha L. Burke\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eatbeh.2025.101984\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Anorexia Nervosa is distinguished from a similar - if not identical - disorder, atypical Anorexia Nervosa, based on weight status. Atypical Anorexia Nervosa is diagnosed when, “despite significant weight loss, [an] individual’s weight is within or above the normal range.” The current scholarly commentary grapples with the historical, biological, and psychosocial flaws inherently entangled in utilizing weight status (and its standardized metrics – i.e., Body Mass Index) as proxies for dietary restriction and health status. We briefly synthesize evidence suggesting that utilization of weight status to differentiate Anorexia Nervosa and Atypical Anorexia Nervosa perpetuates systemic and structural health inequities for individuals with marginalized racial and ethnic identities. This commentary aims to spark discussion on the lack of utility in maintaining two seemingly identical disorders at the cost of perpetuating harm toward historically marginalized groups.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11476,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Eating behaviors\",\"volume\":\"57 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101984\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Eating behaviors\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1471015325000443\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eating behaviors","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1471015325000443","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

根据体重状况,神经性厌食症与类似(如果不是完全相同)的非典型神经性厌食症有所区别。非典型神经性厌食症的诊断是,“尽管体重明显减轻,但个体的体重在正常范围内或高于正常范围。”目前的学术评论努力解决历史、生物和社会心理上的缺陷,这些缺陷固有地纠缠在使用体重状况(及其标准化指标——即身体质量指数)作为饮食限制和健康状况的代理中。我们简要地综合证据表明,利用体重状况来区分神经性厌食症和非典型神经性厌食症会使具有边缘种族和民族身份的个体持续存在系统性和结构性的健康不平等。这篇评论的目的是引发讨论,以对历史上处于边缘地位的群体造成长期伤害为代价,维持两种看似相同的疾病缺乏效用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Examining the weight status criterion as a perpetuator of harm and racial/ethnic disparities in anorexia nervosa
Anorexia Nervosa is distinguished from a similar - if not identical - disorder, atypical Anorexia Nervosa, based on weight status. Atypical Anorexia Nervosa is diagnosed when, “despite significant weight loss, [an] individual’s weight is within or above the normal range.” The current scholarly commentary grapples with the historical, biological, and psychosocial flaws inherently entangled in utilizing weight status (and its standardized metrics – i.e., Body Mass Index) as proxies for dietary restriction and health status. We briefly synthesize evidence suggesting that utilization of weight status to differentiate Anorexia Nervosa and Atypical Anorexia Nervosa perpetuates systemic and structural health inequities for individuals with marginalized racial and ethnic identities. This commentary aims to spark discussion on the lack of utility in maintaining two seemingly identical disorders at the cost of perpetuating harm toward historically marginalized groups.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Eating behaviors
Eating behaviors Multiple-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
3.60%
发文量
65
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Eating Behaviors is an international peer-reviewed scientific journal publishing human research on the etiology, prevention, and treatment of obesity, binge eating, and eating disorders in adults and children. Studies related to the promotion of healthy eating patterns to treat or prevent medical conditions (e.g., hypertension, diabetes mellitus, cancer) are also acceptable. Two types of manuscripts are encouraged: (1) Descriptive studies establishing functional relationships between eating behaviors and social, cognitive, environmental, attitudinal, emotional or biochemical factors; (2) Clinical outcome research evaluating the efficacy of prevention or treatment protocols.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信