内源性长期远期合约对电力批发市场的经济影响

IF 3.8 3区 经济学 Q3 ENERGY & FUELS
Camilo A. Gallego
{"title":"内源性长期远期合约对电力批发市场的经济影响","authors":"Camilo A. Gallego","doi":"10.1016/j.jup.2025.101946","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This analysis examines the economic impact of endogenous forward contracts (EFCs) in wholesale electricity markets, where contract hedging adjusts to spot market conditions rather than remaining fixed. This study applies economic theory to model the effects of forward contracts on spot prices over time and develop an econometric strategy for evaluation. By applying this framework to the Colombian electricity market, we find that a 5% share of EFCs can raise spot prices by 23%, increasing consumer costs by more than $700 million annually. These effects may intensify during extreme weather events, such as El Niño, exposing risks in market design. Our findings challenge the assumption that forward contracts inherently enhance competition and price stability, showing that firms with market power can exploit them. Results remain robust and statistically significant under various scenarios, including different opportunity costs. These insights underscore the need for regulatory oversight to ensure forward contracting fosters competitive outcomes, providing a strong foundation for improving market regulation in Colombia and other jurisdictions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23554,"journal":{"name":"Utilities Policy","volume":"95 ","pages":"Article 101946"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Economic effects in wholesale electricity markets from endogenous long-term forward contracts indexed to spot conditions\",\"authors\":\"Camilo A. Gallego\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jup.2025.101946\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This analysis examines the economic impact of endogenous forward contracts (EFCs) in wholesale electricity markets, where contract hedging adjusts to spot market conditions rather than remaining fixed. This study applies economic theory to model the effects of forward contracts on spot prices over time and develop an econometric strategy for evaluation. By applying this framework to the Colombian electricity market, we find that a 5% share of EFCs can raise spot prices by 23%, increasing consumer costs by more than $700 million annually. These effects may intensify during extreme weather events, such as El Niño, exposing risks in market design. Our findings challenge the assumption that forward contracts inherently enhance competition and price stability, showing that firms with market power can exploit them. Results remain robust and statistically significant under various scenarios, including different opportunity costs. These insights underscore the need for regulatory oversight to ensure forward contracting fosters competitive outcomes, providing a strong foundation for improving market regulation in Colombia and other jurisdictions.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23554,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Utilities Policy\",\"volume\":\"95 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101946\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Utilities Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095717872500061X\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Utilities Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095717872500061X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本分析考察了批发电力市场内生远期合约(EFCs)的经济影响,其中合约对冲调整现货市场条件,而不是保持固定。本研究运用经济学理论对远期合约对现货价格的影响进行建模,并制定计量经济学策略进行评估。通过将这一框架应用于哥伦比亚电力市场,我们发现5%的EFCs份额可以将现货价格提高23%,每年增加7亿多美元的消费者成本。这些影响可能会在极端天气事件期间加剧,如厄尔尼诺Niño,暴露出市场设计的风险。我们的研究结果挑战了远期合约内在地促进竞争和价格稳定的假设,表明具有市场支配力的公司可以利用它们。在包括不同机会成本在内的各种情况下,结果仍然稳健且具有统计学意义。这些见解强调了监管监督的必要性,以确保远期合同促进竞争结果,为改善哥伦比亚和其他司法管辖区的市场监管提供了坚实的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Economic effects in wholesale electricity markets from endogenous long-term forward contracts indexed to spot conditions
This analysis examines the economic impact of endogenous forward contracts (EFCs) in wholesale electricity markets, where contract hedging adjusts to spot market conditions rather than remaining fixed. This study applies economic theory to model the effects of forward contracts on spot prices over time and develop an econometric strategy for evaluation. By applying this framework to the Colombian electricity market, we find that a 5% share of EFCs can raise spot prices by 23%, increasing consumer costs by more than $700 million annually. These effects may intensify during extreme weather events, such as El Niño, exposing risks in market design. Our findings challenge the assumption that forward contracts inherently enhance competition and price stability, showing that firms with market power can exploit them. Results remain robust and statistically significant under various scenarios, including different opportunity costs. These insights underscore the need for regulatory oversight to ensure forward contracting fosters competitive outcomes, providing a strong foundation for improving market regulation in Colombia and other jurisdictions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Utilities Policy
Utilities Policy ENERGY & FUELS-ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
10.00%
发文量
94
审稿时长
66 days
期刊介绍: Utilities Policy is deliberately international, interdisciplinary, and intersectoral. Articles address utility trends and issues in both developed and developing economies. Authors and reviewers come from various disciplines, including economics, political science, sociology, law, finance, accounting, management, and engineering. Areas of focus include the utility and network industries providing essential electricity, natural gas, water and wastewater, solid waste, communications, broadband, postal, and public transportation services. Utilities Policy invites submissions that apply various quantitative and qualitative methods. Contributions are welcome from both established and emerging scholars as well as accomplished practitioners. Interdisciplinary, comparative, and applied works are encouraged. Submissions to the journal should have a clear focus on governance, performance, and/or analysis of public utilities with an aim toward informing the policymaking process and providing recommendations as appropriate. Relevant topics and issues include but are not limited to industry structures and ownership, market design and dynamics, economic development, resource planning, system modeling, accounting and finance, infrastructure investment, supply and demand efficiency, strategic management and productivity, network operations and integration, supply chains, adaptation and flexibility, service-quality standards, benchmarking and metrics, benefit-cost analysis, behavior and incentives, pricing and demand response, economic and environmental regulation, regulatory performance and impact, restructuring and deregulation, and policy institutions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信