院外心脏骤停成人患者先进气道管理的最佳时机评价:一项来自多中心登记的回顾性观察性研究

IF 2.1 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Yuki Kishihara , Shunsuke Amagasa , Hideto Yasuda , Masahiro Kashiura , Yutaro Shinzato , Takashi Moriya
{"title":"院外心脏骤停成人患者先进气道管理的最佳时机评价:一项来自多中心登记的回顾性观察性研究","authors":"Yuki Kishihara ,&nbsp;Shunsuke Amagasa ,&nbsp;Hideto Yasuda ,&nbsp;Masahiro Kashiura ,&nbsp;Yutaro Shinzato ,&nbsp;Takashi Moriya","doi":"10.1016/j.resplu.2025.100957","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aim</h3><div>We aimed to investigate the appropriate timing for advanced airway management (AAM) in witnessed adult non-traumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) by adjusting for resuscitation time bias and limiting the analysis to witnessed OHCA.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This retrospective observational study used a multicentre OHCA registry involving 99 participating hospitals in Japan and included adult patients with witnessed non-traumatic OHCA who underwent AAM during resuscitation. The primary and secondary outcomes were favourable 30-day neurological outcomes and survival, respectively. The time from emergency medical service contact to AAM was categorised as follows: 1–5, 6–10, 11–15, 16–20, 21–25, and 26–30 min. In each group, we calculated the time-dependent propensity score using a Fine-Gray regression model. After propensity score matching, we used a generalised estimating equation (GEE).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 16,448 patients who underwent AAM were matched with patients at risk of requiring AAM. AAM was associated with favourable 30-day neurological outcomes when performed at 6–10 and 16–20 min with RRs (95% CIs) of 1.41 (1.12–1.78), but not at 16–20 min (0.74 [0.56–0.99]), respectively. AAM was associated with improved 30-day survival at 1–5 and 6–10 min (1.22 [1.05–1.41], 1.33 [1.16–1.54], respectively), but not at 16–20 min (0.78 [0.62–0.97].</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Performing AAM within 10 min was associated with improved outcomes compared with those at risk of receiving AAM. However, the results were not consistent across all groups, therefore, careful interpretation is required.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94192,"journal":{"name":"Resuscitation plus","volume":"23 ","pages":"Article 100957"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of the optimal timing for advanced airway management for adult patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A retrospective observational study from a multicenter registry\",\"authors\":\"Yuki Kishihara ,&nbsp;Shunsuke Amagasa ,&nbsp;Hideto Yasuda ,&nbsp;Masahiro Kashiura ,&nbsp;Yutaro Shinzato ,&nbsp;Takashi Moriya\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.resplu.2025.100957\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Aim</h3><div>We aimed to investigate the appropriate timing for advanced airway management (AAM) in witnessed adult non-traumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) by adjusting for resuscitation time bias and limiting the analysis to witnessed OHCA.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This retrospective observational study used a multicentre OHCA registry involving 99 participating hospitals in Japan and included adult patients with witnessed non-traumatic OHCA who underwent AAM during resuscitation. The primary and secondary outcomes were favourable 30-day neurological outcomes and survival, respectively. The time from emergency medical service contact to AAM was categorised as follows: 1–5, 6–10, 11–15, 16–20, 21–25, and 26–30 min. In each group, we calculated the time-dependent propensity score using a Fine-Gray regression model. After propensity score matching, we used a generalised estimating equation (GEE).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 16,448 patients who underwent AAM were matched with patients at risk of requiring AAM. AAM was associated with favourable 30-day neurological outcomes when performed at 6–10 and 16–20 min with RRs (95% CIs) of 1.41 (1.12–1.78), but not at 16–20 min (0.74 [0.56–0.99]), respectively. AAM was associated with improved 30-day survival at 1–5 and 6–10 min (1.22 [1.05–1.41], 1.33 [1.16–1.54], respectively), but not at 16–20 min (0.78 [0.62–0.97].</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Performing AAM within 10 min was associated with improved outcomes compared with those at risk of receiving AAM. However, the results were not consistent across all groups, therefore, careful interpretation is required.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94192,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Resuscitation plus\",\"volume\":\"23 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100957\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Resuscitation plus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666520425000943\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resuscitation plus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666520425000943","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:通过调整复苏时间偏差,并将分析限制在目击成人非创伤性院外心脏骤停(OHCA)中,探讨进行高级气道管理(AAM)的合适时机。方法:本回顾性观察性研究采用多中心OHCA登记,涉及日本99家参与的医院,包括在复苏期间发生AAM的非创伤性OHCA的成年患者。主要和次要结果分别为良好的30天神经预后和生存。从紧急医疗服务接触到AAM的时间分类如下:1-5分钟、6-10分钟、11-15分钟、16-20分钟、21-25分钟和26-30分钟。在每一组中,我们使用Fine-Gray回归模型计算时间依赖性倾向得分。在倾向得分匹配后,我们使用广义估计方程(GEE)。结果16,448例接受AAM治疗的患者与需要AAM治疗的患者相匹配。在6-10分钟和16-20分钟进行AAM治疗与良好的30天神经预后相关,相对危险度(95% ci)分别为1.41(1.12-1.78),但在16-20分钟进行AAM治疗则不相关(0.74[0.56-0.99])。AAM与1-5分钟和6-10分钟的30天生存率相关(分别为1.22[1.05-1.41]、1.33[1.16-1.54]),但与16-20分钟的生存率无关(0.78[0.62-0.97])。结论与有接受AAM风险的患者相比,在10 min内进行AAM治疗可改善预后。然而,结果并非在所有组中一致,因此,需要仔细解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Evaluation of the optimal timing for advanced airway management for adult patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A retrospective observational study from a multicenter registry

Evaluation of the optimal timing for advanced airway management for adult patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A retrospective observational study from a multicenter registry

Aim

We aimed to investigate the appropriate timing for advanced airway management (AAM) in witnessed adult non-traumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) by adjusting for resuscitation time bias and limiting the analysis to witnessed OHCA.

Methods

This retrospective observational study used a multicentre OHCA registry involving 99 participating hospitals in Japan and included adult patients with witnessed non-traumatic OHCA who underwent AAM during resuscitation. The primary and secondary outcomes were favourable 30-day neurological outcomes and survival, respectively. The time from emergency medical service contact to AAM was categorised as follows: 1–5, 6–10, 11–15, 16–20, 21–25, and 26–30 min. In each group, we calculated the time-dependent propensity score using a Fine-Gray regression model. After propensity score matching, we used a generalised estimating equation (GEE).

Results

A total of 16,448 patients who underwent AAM were matched with patients at risk of requiring AAM. AAM was associated with favourable 30-day neurological outcomes when performed at 6–10 and 16–20 min with RRs (95% CIs) of 1.41 (1.12–1.78), but not at 16–20 min (0.74 [0.56–0.99]), respectively. AAM was associated with improved 30-day survival at 1–5 and 6–10 min (1.22 [1.05–1.41], 1.33 [1.16–1.54], respectively), but not at 16–20 min (0.78 [0.62–0.97].

Conclusions

Performing AAM within 10 min was associated with improved outcomes compared with those at risk of receiving AAM. However, the results were not consistent across all groups, therefore, careful interpretation is required.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Resuscitation plus
Resuscitation plus Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
52 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信