亲自我还是亲社会?人工智能和人类工作的替代如何引发补偿性反应

IF 10.5 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Xiaofei Bai , Hao Zhang , Zengguang Ma , Chenyue Qi
{"title":"亲自我还是亲社会?人工智能和人类工作的替代如何引发补偿性反应","authors":"Xiaofei Bai ,&nbsp;Hao Zhang ,&nbsp;Zengguang Ma ,&nbsp;Chenyue Qi","doi":"10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115402","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly replacing human roles in the workplace, which causes broad concerns about job losses. However, existing studies on AI job replacement have largely neglected how employment instability affects individuals’ consumption habits. This paper conducts five studies to examine how AI job replacement affects individuals’ consumption behavior. Our findings demonstrate that job replacement increases individuals’ perception of threats across various professional backgrounds. Further analysis reveals that, compared to job replacement caused by humans, AI job replacement poses a greater threat to individuals’ need for control than their need for belonging. As a result, individuals replaced by AI are more likely to engage in self-focused conspicuous consumption rather than pro-social behaviors. We confirmed the robustness of these findings by manipulating individual needs and discovered that encouraging self-affirmation significantly reduces both perceived threats and compensatory behaviors, regardless of whether the job replacement is AI-driven or human-driven.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Research","volume":"195 ","pages":"Article 115402"},"PeriodicalIF":10.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pro-Self or Pro-Social? how AI and human job replacement elicit compensatory responses\",\"authors\":\"Xiaofei Bai ,&nbsp;Hao Zhang ,&nbsp;Zengguang Ma ,&nbsp;Chenyue Qi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115402\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly replacing human roles in the workplace, which causes broad concerns about job losses. However, existing studies on AI job replacement have largely neglected how employment instability affects individuals’ consumption habits. This paper conducts five studies to examine how AI job replacement affects individuals’ consumption behavior. Our findings demonstrate that job replacement increases individuals’ perception of threats across various professional backgrounds. Further analysis reveals that, compared to job replacement caused by humans, AI job replacement poses a greater threat to individuals’ need for control than their need for belonging. As a result, individuals replaced by AI are more likely to engage in self-focused conspicuous consumption rather than pro-social behaviors. We confirmed the robustness of these findings by manipulating individual needs and discovered that encouraging self-affirmation significantly reduces both perceived threats and compensatory behaviors, regardless of whether the job replacement is AI-driven or human-driven.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15123,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Business Research\",\"volume\":\"195 \",\"pages\":\"Article 115402\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Business Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296325002255\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296325002255","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人工智能(AI)正在越来越多地取代人类在工作场所的角色,这引起了人们对失业的广泛担忧。然而,现有关于人工智能工作替代的研究在很大程度上忽视了就业不稳定性如何影响个人的消费习惯。本文开展了五项研究,探讨人工智能工作替代如何影响个人的消费行为。我们的研究结果表明,在不同的职业背景下,工作替代会增加个人对威胁的感知。进一步的分析表明,与人类造成的工作替代相比,人工智能工作替代对个人的控制需求构成的威胁大于归属需求。因此,被人工智能取代的个体更有可能从事以自我为中心的炫耀性消费,而不是亲社会行为。我们通过操纵个体需求证实了这些发现的稳健性,并发现无论工作替代是人工智能驱动还是人类驱动,鼓励自我肯定都能显著减少感知威胁和补偿行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pro-Self or Pro-Social? how AI and human job replacement elicit compensatory responses
Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly replacing human roles in the workplace, which causes broad concerns about job losses. However, existing studies on AI job replacement have largely neglected how employment instability affects individuals’ consumption habits. This paper conducts five studies to examine how AI job replacement affects individuals’ consumption behavior. Our findings demonstrate that job replacement increases individuals’ perception of threats across various professional backgrounds. Further analysis reveals that, compared to job replacement caused by humans, AI job replacement poses a greater threat to individuals’ need for control than their need for belonging. As a result, individuals replaced by AI are more likely to engage in self-focused conspicuous consumption rather than pro-social behaviors. We confirmed the robustness of these findings by manipulating individual needs and discovered that encouraging self-affirmation significantly reduces both perceived threats and compensatory behaviors, regardless of whether the job replacement is AI-driven or human-driven.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
20.30
自引率
10.60%
发文量
956
期刊介绍: The Journal of Business Research aims to publish research that is rigorous, relevant, and potentially impactful. It examines a wide variety of business decision contexts, processes, and activities, developing insights that are meaningful for theory, practice, and/or society at large. The research is intended to generate meaningful debates in academia and practice, that are thought provoking and have the potential to make a difference to conceptual thinking and/or practice. The Journal is published for a broad range of stakeholders, including scholars, researchers, executives, and policy makers. It aids the application of its research to practical situations and theoretical findings to the reality of the business world as well as to society. The Journal is abstracted and indexed in several databases, including Social Sciences Citation Index, ANBAR, Current Contents, Management Contents, Management Literature in Brief, PsycINFO, Information Service, RePEc, Academic Journal Guide, ABI/Inform, INSPEC, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信