Marc Escribà-Gelonch, Jose Luis Osorio-Tejada, Le Yu, Bart Wanten, Annemie Bogaerts, Volker Hessel
{"title":"可持续等离子体辅助甲烷重整技术合成气生产的技术经济和生命周期评价","authors":"Marc Escribà-Gelonch, Jose Luis Osorio-Tejada, Le Yu, Bart Wanten, Annemie Bogaerts, Volker Hessel","doi":"10.1039/d4ee05129g","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study combines for the first time techno-economic and life-cycle assessment metrics to evaluate the economic and environmental viability of plasma-assisted dry reforming of methane (DRM) for producing syngas from methane-rich natural gas. The study compares three different processes (plasma-assisted dry reforming (CO<small><sub>2</sub></small>/CH<small><sub>4</sub></small>), oxi-CO<small><sub>2</sub></small> reforming (CO<small><sub>2</sub></small>/CH<small><sub>4</sub></small>/O<small><sub>2</sub></small>) and bi-reforming (CO<small><sub>2</sub></small>/CH<small><sub>4</sub></small>/H<small><sub>2</sub></small>O)), as well as with current state-of-the-art steam reforming technology. Advancements in cost reduction and environmental performance are highlighted. While comparative studies on different plasma processing concepts have been published, their number is not large; meaning this study is bespoke in this aspect. Our study is also bespoken in extensive consideration of industrial gas separation, to provide a holistic view on sustainability with industrial viewpoint. Three different production design scenarios were considered in the analysis: DRM (scenario 1), oxy-CO<small><sub>2</sub></small> reforming of CH<small><sub>4</sub></small> (OCRM) (scenario 2), and bi-reforming of CH<small><sub>4</sub></small> (BRM) (scenario 3). This evaluation was carried out through a techno-economic analysis and a cradle-to-gate life cycle assessment (LCA). Among the scenarios analysed, OCRM demonstrates the most favourable economic performance, leading to a unitary cost of production of 549 $/tonne syngas, followed by DRM and BRM. However, when operating at large scale, the syngas production cost of BRM could compete with the benchmark if 20% reduction in plasma power consumption can be achieved, so in the near future, plasma-based BRM could be competitive against other more mature electric-powered technologies. When assessing environmental performance across 10 environmental categories of LCA metrics, OCRM is again preferred, followed by DRM and BRM. Key impact categories identified include freshwater eutrophication potential and energy consumption, which are significant contributors to environmental impacts. A study on the transition of energy sources indicates a substantial decrease in global environmental impact in the range of 50% when shifting from current electricity generation methods to wind energy sources. Comparative benchmarking reveals that the technologies evaluated in all three plasma scenarios perform better in environmental metrics across 7 over 9 categories assessed, when compared with current state-of-the-art steam reforming technologies. A material circularity indicator around 0.7 is obtained in all scenarios with slight differences, reflecting a medium-high level of circularity. Sectors such as chemicals, and recycling manufacturing could greatly benefit from our findings on plasma-assisted methane reforming. By leveraging these technologies, the energy industry can facilitate a shift toward renewable energy sources, enabling cost-effective and environmentally friendly production.","PeriodicalId":72,"journal":{"name":"Energy & Environmental Science","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":32.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Techno-Economic and Life-Cycle Assessment for Syngas Production Using Sustainable Plasma-Assisted Methane Reforming Technologies\",\"authors\":\"Marc Escribà-Gelonch, Jose Luis Osorio-Tejada, Le Yu, Bart Wanten, Annemie Bogaerts, Volker Hessel\",\"doi\":\"10.1039/d4ee05129g\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study combines for the first time techno-economic and life-cycle assessment metrics to evaluate the economic and environmental viability of plasma-assisted dry reforming of methane (DRM) for producing syngas from methane-rich natural gas. The study compares three different processes (plasma-assisted dry reforming (CO<small><sub>2</sub></small>/CH<small><sub>4</sub></small>), oxi-CO<small><sub>2</sub></small> reforming (CO<small><sub>2</sub></small>/CH<small><sub>4</sub></small>/O<small><sub>2</sub></small>) and bi-reforming (CO<small><sub>2</sub></small>/CH<small><sub>4</sub></small>/H<small><sub>2</sub></small>O)), as well as with current state-of-the-art steam reforming technology. Advancements in cost reduction and environmental performance are highlighted. While comparative studies on different plasma processing concepts have been published, their number is not large; meaning this study is bespoke in this aspect. Our study is also bespoken in extensive consideration of industrial gas separation, to provide a holistic view on sustainability with industrial viewpoint. Three different production design scenarios were considered in the analysis: DRM (scenario 1), oxy-CO<small><sub>2</sub></small> reforming of CH<small><sub>4</sub></small> (OCRM) (scenario 2), and bi-reforming of CH<small><sub>4</sub></small> (BRM) (scenario 3). This evaluation was carried out through a techno-economic analysis and a cradle-to-gate life cycle assessment (LCA). Among the scenarios analysed, OCRM demonstrates the most favourable economic performance, leading to a unitary cost of production of 549 $/tonne syngas, followed by DRM and BRM. However, when operating at large scale, the syngas production cost of BRM could compete with the benchmark if 20% reduction in plasma power consumption can be achieved, so in the near future, plasma-based BRM could be competitive against other more mature electric-powered technologies. When assessing environmental performance across 10 environmental categories of LCA metrics, OCRM is again preferred, followed by DRM and BRM. Key impact categories identified include freshwater eutrophication potential and energy consumption, which are significant contributors to environmental impacts. A study on the transition of energy sources indicates a substantial decrease in global environmental impact in the range of 50% when shifting from current electricity generation methods to wind energy sources. Comparative benchmarking reveals that the technologies evaluated in all three plasma scenarios perform better in environmental metrics across 7 over 9 categories assessed, when compared with current state-of-the-art steam reforming technologies. A material circularity indicator around 0.7 is obtained in all scenarios with slight differences, reflecting a medium-high level of circularity. Sectors such as chemicals, and recycling manufacturing could greatly benefit from our findings on plasma-assisted methane reforming. By leveraging these technologies, the energy industry can facilitate a shift toward renewable energy sources, enabling cost-effective and environmentally friendly production.\",\"PeriodicalId\":72,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy & Environmental Science\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":32.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy & Environmental Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"88\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1039/d4ee05129g\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy & Environmental Science","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1039/d4ee05129g","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Techno-Economic and Life-Cycle Assessment for Syngas Production Using Sustainable Plasma-Assisted Methane Reforming Technologies
This study combines for the first time techno-economic and life-cycle assessment metrics to evaluate the economic and environmental viability of plasma-assisted dry reforming of methane (DRM) for producing syngas from methane-rich natural gas. The study compares three different processes (plasma-assisted dry reforming (CO2/CH4), oxi-CO2 reforming (CO2/CH4/O2) and bi-reforming (CO2/CH4/H2O)), as well as with current state-of-the-art steam reforming technology. Advancements in cost reduction and environmental performance are highlighted. While comparative studies on different plasma processing concepts have been published, their number is not large; meaning this study is bespoke in this aspect. Our study is also bespoken in extensive consideration of industrial gas separation, to provide a holistic view on sustainability with industrial viewpoint. Three different production design scenarios were considered in the analysis: DRM (scenario 1), oxy-CO2 reforming of CH4 (OCRM) (scenario 2), and bi-reforming of CH4 (BRM) (scenario 3). This evaluation was carried out through a techno-economic analysis and a cradle-to-gate life cycle assessment (LCA). Among the scenarios analysed, OCRM demonstrates the most favourable economic performance, leading to a unitary cost of production of 549 $/tonne syngas, followed by DRM and BRM. However, when operating at large scale, the syngas production cost of BRM could compete with the benchmark if 20% reduction in plasma power consumption can be achieved, so in the near future, plasma-based BRM could be competitive against other more mature electric-powered technologies. When assessing environmental performance across 10 environmental categories of LCA metrics, OCRM is again preferred, followed by DRM and BRM. Key impact categories identified include freshwater eutrophication potential and energy consumption, which are significant contributors to environmental impacts. A study on the transition of energy sources indicates a substantial decrease in global environmental impact in the range of 50% when shifting from current electricity generation methods to wind energy sources. Comparative benchmarking reveals that the technologies evaluated in all three plasma scenarios perform better in environmental metrics across 7 over 9 categories assessed, when compared with current state-of-the-art steam reforming technologies. A material circularity indicator around 0.7 is obtained in all scenarios with slight differences, reflecting a medium-high level of circularity. Sectors such as chemicals, and recycling manufacturing could greatly benefit from our findings on plasma-assisted methane reforming. By leveraging these technologies, the energy industry can facilitate a shift toward renewable energy sources, enabling cost-effective and environmentally friendly production.
期刊介绍:
Energy & Environmental Science, a peer-reviewed scientific journal, publishes original research and review articles covering interdisciplinary topics in the (bio)chemical and (bio)physical sciences, as well as chemical engineering disciplines. Published monthly by the Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC), a not-for-profit publisher, Energy & Environmental Science is recognized as a leading journal. It boasts an impressive impact factor of 8.500 as of 2009, ranking 8th among 140 journals in the category "Chemistry, Multidisciplinary," second among 71 journals in "Energy & Fuels," second among 128 journals in "Engineering, Chemical," and first among 181 scientific journals in "Environmental Sciences."
Energy & Environmental Science publishes various types of articles, including Research Papers (original scientific work), Review Articles, Perspectives, and Minireviews (feature review-type articles of broad interest), Communications (original scientific work of an urgent nature), Opinions (personal, often speculative viewpoints or hypotheses on current topics), and Analysis Articles (in-depth examination of energy-related issues).