内皮活化和应激指数预测高血压患者的全因死亡率和心血管死亡率:一项全国性研究

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Gaiying Dong, Tingting Wu, Xiaofan Gu, Liangliang Wu
{"title":"内皮活化和应激指数预测高血压患者的全因死亡率和心血管死亡率:一项全国性研究","authors":"Gaiying Dong,&nbsp;Tingting Wu,&nbsp;Xiaofan Gu,&nbsp;Liangliang Wu","doi":"10.1111/jch.70057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Emerging evidence links the Endothelial Activation and Stress Index (EASIX) and mortality risk in coronary artery disease, but its relevance in hypertensive patients remains unclear. This study examines the association between EASIX and all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in hypertensive individuals. The analysis included 6138 hypertensive patients from seven National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHNES) cycles (2003–2016), with mortality data obtained from the National Death Index (NDI). Over a median follow-up of 98 months, 1435 (23.4%) participants died, including 400 (6.5%) from cardiovascular causes. Restricted cubic spline analysis revealed a positive association between EASIX and both all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. Weighted multivariable Cox regression indicated that each 1-unit increase in EASIX corresponding to a 25% and 23% rise in mortality risk, respectively. Based on the optimal cutoff value determined using the maximally selected rank statistics method, participants were stratified into higher (&gt;0.79) and lower (≤0.79) EASIX groups. Higher EASIX was significantly associated with increased all-cause mortality risk (HR 1.46, 95% CI 1.23–1.73, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001). Higher EASIX scores were associated with increased cardiovascular mortality, especially in former/current smokers and those with diabetes/prediabetes. Time-dependent receiver operating characteristic analysis assessed the predictive accuracy of EASIX, yielding area under the curve (AUC) for 1-, 3-, 5-, and 10-year survival of 0.71, 0.67, 0.67, and 0.67 for all-cause mortality and 0.79, 0.73, 0.73, and 0.71 for cardiovascular mortality. In conclusion, elevated EASIX is independently associated with increased all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in hypertensive patients, suggesting its potential as a predictive biomarker in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":50237,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Hypertension","volume":"27 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jch.70057","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Endothelial Activation and Stress Index Predicts All-Cause and Cardiovascular Mortality in Hypertensive Individuals: A Nationwide Study\",\"authors\":\"Gaiying Dong,&nbsp;Tingting Wu,&nbsp;Xiaofan Gu,&nbsp;Liangliang Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jch.70057\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Emerging evidence links the Endothelial Activation and Stress Index (EASIX) and mortality risk in coronary artery disease, but its relevance in hypertensive patients remains unclear. This study examines the association between EASIX and all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in hypertensive individuals. The analysis included 6138 hypertensive patients from seven National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHNES) cycles (2003–2016), with mortality data obtained from the National Death Index (NDI). Over a median follow-up of 98 months, 1435 (23.4%) participants died, including 400 (6.5%) from cardiovascular causes. Restricted cubic spline analysis revealed a positive association between EASIX and both all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. Weighted multivariable Cox regression indicated that each 1-unit increase in EASIX corresponding to a 25% and 23% rise in mortality risk, respectively. Based on the optimal cutoff value determined using the maximally selected rank statistics method, participants were stratified into higher (&gt;0.79) and lower (≤0.79) EASIX groups. Higher EASIX was significantly associated with increased all-cause mortality risk (HR 1.46, 95% CI 1.23–1.73, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001). Higher EASIX scores were associated with increased cardiovascular mortality, especially in former/current smokers and those with diabetes/prediabetes. Time-dependent receiver operating characteristic analysis assessed the predictive accuracy of EASIX, yielding area under the curve (AUC) for 1-, 3-, 5-, and 10-year survival of 0.71, 0.67, 0.67, and 0.67 for all-cause mortality and 0.79, 0.73, 0.73, and 0.71 for cardiovascular mortality. In conclusion, elevated EASIX is independently associated with increased all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in hypertensive patients, suggesting its potential as a predictive biomarker in clinical practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50237,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Hypertension\",\"volume\":\"27 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jch.70057\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Hypertension\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jch.70057\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Hypertension","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jch.70057","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

新出现的证据将内皮激活和应激指数(EASIX)与冠状动脉疾病的死亡风险联系起来,但其与高血压患者的相关性尚不清楚。本研究探讨了EASIX与高血压患者全因死亡率和心血管死亡率之间的关系。分析对象为2003-2016年7个国家健康与营养调查周期(NHNES)的6138例高血压患者,死亡率数据来自国家死亡指数(NDI)。在中位随访98个月期间,1435名(23.4%)参与者死亡,其中400名(6.5%)死于心血管原因。限制性三次样条分析显示EASIX与全因死亡率和心血管死亡率呈正相关。加权多变量Cox回归表明,EASIX每增加1个单位,分别对应死亡风险增加25%和23%。根据最大选择秩统计方法确定的最优截断值,将参与者分为EASIX高组(>0.79)和低组(≤0.79)。较高的EASIX与全因死亡风险增加显著相关(HR 1.46, 95% CI 1.23-1.73, p <;0.0001)。EASIX评分越高,心血管疾病死亡率越高,尤其是在曾经/现在的吸烟者和糖尿病/前驱糖尿病患者中。时间依赖的受试者工作特征分析评估了EASIX的预测准确性,全因死亡率的1年、3年、5年和10年生存率曲线下面积(AUC)分别为0.71、0.67、0.67和0.67,心血管死亡率为0.79、0.73、0.73和0.71。总之,EASIX升高与高血压患者全因死亡率和心血管死亡率升高独立相关,提示其在临床实践中有作为预测性生物标志物的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Endothelial Activation and Stress Index Predicts All-Cause and Cardiovascular Mortality in Hypertensive Individuals: A Nationwide Study

Endothelial Activation and Stress Index Predicts All-Cause and Cardiovascular Mortality in Hypertensive Individuals: A Nationwide Study

Emerging evidence links the Endothelial Activation and Stress Index (EASIX) and mortality risk in coronary artery disease, but its relevance in hypertensive patients remains unclear. This study examines the association between EASIX and all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in hypertensive individuals. The analysis included 6138 hypertensive patients from seven National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHNES) cycles (2003–2016), with mortality data obtained from the National Death Index (NDI). Over a median follow-up of 98 months, 1435 (23.4%) participants died, including 400 (6.5%) from cardiovascular causes. Restricted cubic spline analysis revealed a positive association between EASIX and both all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. Weighted multivariable Cox regression indicated that each 1-unit increase in EASIX corresponding to a 25% and 23% rise in mortality risk, respectively. Based on the optimal cutoff value determined using the maximally selected rank statistics method, participants were stratified into higher (>0.79) and lower (≤0.79) EASIX groups. Higher EASIX was significantly associated with increased all-cause mortality risk (HR 1.46, 95% CI 1.23–1.73, p < 0.0001). Higher EASIX scores were associated with increased cardiovascular mortality, especially in former/current smokers and those with diabetes/prediabetes. Time-dependent receiver operating characteristic analysis assessed the predictive accuracy of EASIX, yielding area under the curve (AUC) for 1-, 3-, 5-, and 10-year survival of 0.71, 0.67, 0.67, and 0.67 for all-cause mortality and 0.79, 0.73, 0.73, and 0.71 for cardiovascular mortality. In conclusion, elevated EASIX is independently associated with increased all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in hypertensive patients, suggesting its potential as a predictive biomarker in clinical practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Hypertension
Journal of Clinical Hypertension PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
7.10%
发文量
191
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Hypertension is a peer-reviewed, monthly publication that serves internists, cardiologists, nephrologists, endocrinologists, hypertension specialists, primary care practitioners, pharmacists and all professionals interested in hypertension by providing objective, up-to-date information and practical recommendations on the full range of clinical aspects of hypertension. Commentaries and columns by experts in the field provide further insights into our original research articles as well as on major articles published elsewhere. Major guidelines for the management of hypertension are also an important feature of the Journal. Through its partnership with the World Hypertension League, JCH will include a new focus on hypertension and public health, including major policy issues, that features research and reviews related to disease characteristics and management at the population level.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信