四川盆地长宁页岩气田与水力压裂有关的浅、深瞬变地震活动

IF 3.9 2区 地球科学 Q1 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
Jian Xu, Junlun Li, Wen Yang, Guoyi Chen, Yajing Liu, Alessandro Verdecchia, Rebecca M. Harrington, Renqi Lu, Yuyang Tan, Yapei Ye, Jizhou Tang
{"title":"四川盆地长宁页岩气田与水力压裂有关的浅、深瞬变地震活动","authors":"Jian Xu,&nbsp;Junlun Li,&nbsp;Wen Yang,&nbsp;Guoyi Chen,&nbsp;Yajing Liu,&nbsp;Alessandro Verdecchia,&nbsp;Rebecca M. Harrington,&nbsp;Renqi Lu,&nbsp;Yuyang Tan,&nbsp;Yapei Ye,&nbsp;Jizhou Tang","doi":"10.1029/2024JB030279","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Characterizing seismic responses to hydraulic fracturing (HF) in shale-gas development is crucial for seismic-hazard assessment and mitigation-strategy design. Although intensive HF operations have led to severe induced seismic hazards in the Changning shale gas field (CSF) in China for over a decade, the typical spatiotemporal characteristics of induced seismicity during and after HF in this region remain unclear, due to a lack of detailed fluid-injection data. Using a 70-day-long dense deployment of 336 nodal-sensors in 2019, we develop an enhanced seismicity catalog and combine it with focal mechanism solutions, fluid-injection time series, seismic-reflection profiles, and geomechanical models to identify the distinct shallow and deep seismicity responses to HF. The first pattern consists of deep earthquake clusters that migrate along strike-slip faults in the limestone formation ∼1 km below the treatment depth. These clusters contain frequent <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <msub>\n <mi>M</mi>\n <mi>L</mi>\n </msub>\n <mo>&gt;</mo>\n <mn>2</mn>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> ${M}_{\\mathrm{L}} &gt; 2$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> earthquakes, including the largest <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <msub>\n <mi>M</mi>\n <mi>L</mi>\n </msub>\n <mn>3.3</mn>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> ${M}_{\\mathrm{L}}3.3$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> event, and exhibit transient seismicity-rate changes in rapid response to HF. In contrast, the second pattern consists of shallow clusters in the target shale formation that persist for over a year following HF. The shallow clusters include smaller earthquakes and exhibit thrust-style faulting with no discernible spatial migration. Our geomechanical simulations suggest the deep fault reactivation is best explained by the combined effects of poroelastic-stress loading and pore-pressure increases. Stable seismicity rate and frequent casing deformation indicate post-HF, long-term aseismic deformation may drive the shallow seismicity. These distinct seismic responses during and after HF operations underscore the need for a spatiotemporally adaptive hazard mitigation strategy for the CSF.</p>","PeriodicalId":15864,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth","volume":"130 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Shallow Lingering and Deep Transient Seismicity Related to Hydraulic Fracturing in the Changning Shale Gas Field, Sichuan Basin, China\",\"authors\":\"Jian Xu,&nbsp;Junlun Li,&nbsp;Wen Yang,&nbsp;Guoyi Chen,&nbsp;Yajing Liu,&nbsp;Alessandro Verdecchia,&nbsp;Rebecca M. Harrington,&nbsp;Renqi Lu,&nbsp;Yuyang Tan,&nbsp;Yapei Ye,&nbsp;Jizhou Tang\",\"doi\":\"10.1029/2024JB030279\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Characterizing seismic responses to hydraulic fracturing (HF) in shale-gas development is crucial for seismic-hazard assessment and mitigation-strategy design. Although intensive HF operations have led to severe induced seismic hazards in the Changning shale gas field (CSF) in China for over a decade, the typical spatiotemporal characteristics of induced seismicity during and after HF in this region remain unclear, due to a lack of detailed fluid-injection data. Using a 70-day-long dense deployment of 336 nodal-sensors in 2019, we develop an enhanced seismicity catalog and combine it with focal mechanism solutions, fluid-injection time series, seismic-reflection profiles, and geomechanical models to identify the distinct shallow and deep seismicity responses to HF. The first pattern consists of deep earthquake clusters that migrate along strike-slip faults in the limestone formation ∼1 km below the treatment depth. These clusters contain frequent <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <msub>\\n <mi>M</mi>\\n <mi>L</mi>\\n </msub>\\n <mo>&gt;</mo>\\n <mn>2</mn>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation> ${M}_{\\\\mathrm{L}} &gt; 2$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> earthquakes, including the largest <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <msub>\\n <mi>M</mi>\\n <mi>L</mi>\\n </msub>\\n <mn>3.3</mn>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation> ${M}_{\\\\mathrm{L}}3.3$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> event, and exhibit transient seismicity-rate changes in rapid response to HF. In contrast, the second pattern consists of shallow clusters in the target shale formation that persist for over a year following HF. The shallow clusters include smaller earthquakes and exhibit thrust-style faulting with no discernible spatial migration. Our geomechanical simulations suggest the deep fault reactivation is best explained by the combined effects of poroelastic-stress loading and pore-pressure increases. Stable seismicity rate and frequent casing deformation indicate post-HF, long-term aseismic deformation may drive the shallow seismicity. These distinct seismic responses during and after HF operations underscore the need for a spatiotemporally adaptive hazard mitigation strategy for the CSF.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15864,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth\",\"volume\":\"130 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024JB030279\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024JB030279","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

页岩气开发中水力压裂(HF)的地震响应特征对于地震危害评估和减灾策略设计至关重要。尽管近十多年来,中国长宁页岩气田频繁的高频作业造成了严重的诱发地震灾害,但由于缺乏详细的流体注入数据,该地区在高频作业期间和之后诱发地震活动的典型时空特征尚不清楚。2019年,通过长达70天的336个节点传感器密集部署,我们开发了一个增强的地震活动目录,并将其与震源机制解决方案、流体注入时间序列、地震反射剖面和地质力学模型相结合,以识别HF的不同浅层和深层地震活动响应。第一种模式由深地震群组成,它们沿着灰岩地层中的走滑断层在处理深度以下约1公里处迁移。这些簇包含频繁的M L >;2 ${M}_{\ mathm {L}} >;2$地震,包括最大的ml 3.3$ {M}_{\ mathm {L}}3.3$事件,并在高频的快速响应中表现出瞬态地震率变化。相比之下,第二种模式由目标页岩地层中的浅层簇组成,在HF后持续一年以上。浅层簇包括较小的地震,并表现出逆冲式断层,没有明显的空间偏移。我们的地质力学模拟表明,深断层的再激活最好的解释是孔隙弹性应力加载和孔隙压力增加的联合作用。稳定的地震活动性和频繁的套管变形表明,高频后,长期的地震变形可能驱动浅层地震活动性。在HF作业期间和之后,这些不同的地震反应强调了CSF的时空适应性减灾策略的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Shallow Lingering and Deep Transient Seismicity Related to Hydraulic Fracturing in the Changning Shale Gas Field, Sichuan Basin, China

Characterizing seismic responses to hydraulic fracturing (HF) in shale-gas development is crucial for seismic-hazard assessment and mitigation-strategy design. Although intensive HF operations have led to severe induced seismic hazards in the Changning shale gas field (CSF) in China for over a decade, the typical spatiotemporal characteristics of induced seismicity during and after HF in this region remain unclear, due to a lack of detailed fluid-injection data. Using a 70-day-long dense deployment of 336 nodal-sensors in 2019, we develop an enhanced seismicity catalog and combine it with focal mechanism solutions, fluid-injection time series, seismic-reflection profiles, and geomechanical models to identify the distinct shallow and deep seismicity responses to HF. The first pattern consists of deep earthquake clusters that migrate along strike-slip faults in the limestone formation ∼1 km below the treatment depth. These clusters contain frequent M L > 2 ${M}_{\mathrm{L}} > 2$ earthquakes, including the largest M L 3.3 ${M}_{\mathrm{L}}3.3$ event, and exhibit transient seismicity-rate changes in rapid response to HF. In contrast, the second pattern consists of shallow clusters in the target shale formation that persist for over a year following HF. The shallow clusters include smaller earthquakes and exhibit thrust-style faulting with no discernible spatial migration. Our geomechanical simulations suggest the deep fault reactivation is best explained by the combined effects of poroelastic-stress loading and pore-pressure increases. Stable seismicity rate and frequent casing deformation indicate post-HF, long-term aseismic deformation may drive the shallow seismicity. These distinct seismic responses during and after HF operations underscore the need for a spatiotemporally adaptive hazard mitigation strategy for the CSF.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth
Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth Earth and Planetary Sciences-Geophysics
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
15.40%
发文量
559
期刊介绍: The Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth serves as the premier publication for the breadth of solid Earth geophysics including (in alphabetical order): electromagnetic methods; exploration geophysics; geodesy and gravity; geodynamics, rheology, and plate kinematics; geomagnetism and paleomagnetism; hydrogeophysics; Instruments, techniques, and models; solid Earth interactions with the cryosphere, atmosphere, oceans, and climate; marine geology and geophysics; natural and anthropogenic hazards; near surface geophysics; petrology, geochemistry, and mineralogy; planet Earth physics and chemistry; rock mechanics and deformation; seismology; tectonophysics; and volcanology. JGR: Solid Earth has long distinguished itself as the venue for publication of Research Articles backed solidly by data and as well as presenting theoretical and numerical developments with broad applications. Research Articles published in JGR: Solid Earth have had long-term impacts in their fields. JGR: Solid Earth provides a venue for special issues and special themes based on conferences, workshops, and community initiatives. JGR: Solid Earth also publishes Commentaries on research and emerging trends in the field; these are commissioned by the editors, and suggestion are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信