{"title":"四川盆地长宁页岩气田与水力压裂有关的浅、深瞬变地震活动","authors":"Jian Xu, Junlun Li, Wen Yang, Guoyi Chen, Yajing Liu, Alessandro Verdecchia, Rebecca M. Harrington, Renqi Lu, Yuyang Tan, Yapei Ye, Jizhou Tang","doi":"10.1029/2024JB030279","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Characterizing seismic responses to hydraulic fracturing (HF) in shale-gas development is crucial for seismic-hazard assessment and mitigation-strategy design. Although intensive HF operations have led to severe induced seismic hazards in the Changning shale gas field (CSF) in China for over a decade, the typical spatiotemporal characteristics of induced seismicity during and after HF in this region remain unclear, due to a lack of detailed fluid-injection data. Using a 70-day-long dense deployment of 336 nodal-sensors in 2019, we develop an enhanced seismicity catalog and combine it with focal mechanism solutions, fluid-injection time series, seismic-reflection profiles, and geomechanical models to identify the distinct shallow and deep seismicity responses to HF. The first pattern consists of deep earthquake clusters that migrate along strike-slip faults in the limestone formation ∼1 km below the treatment depth. These clusters contain frequent <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <msub>\n <mi>M</mi>\n <mi>L</mi>\n </msub>\n <mo>></mo>\n <mn>2</mn>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> ${M}_{\\mathrm{L}} > 2$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> earthquakes, including the largest <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <msub>\n <mi>M</mi>\n <mi>L</mi>\n </msub>\n <mn>3.3</mn>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> ${M}_{\\mathrm{L}}3.3$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> event, and exhibit transient seismicity-rate changes in rapid response to HF. In contrast, the second pattern consists of shallow clusters in the target shale formation that persist for over a year following HF. The shallow clusters include smaller earthquakes and exhibit thrust-style faulting with no discernible spatial migration. Our geomechanical simulations suggest the deep fault reactivation is best explained by the combined effects of poroelastic-stress loading and pore-pressure increases. Stable seismicity rate and frequent casing deformation indicate post-HF, long-term aseismic deformation may drive the shallow seismicity. These distinct seismic responses during and after HF operations underscore the need for a spatiotemporally adaptive hazard mitigation strategy for the CSF.</p>","PeriodicalId":15864,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth","volume":"130 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Shallow Lingering and Deep Transient Seismicity Related to Hydraulic Fracturing in the Changning Shale Gas Field, Sichuan Basin, China\",\"authors\":\"Jian Xu, Junlun Li, Wen Yang, Guoyi Chen, Yajing Liu, Alessandro Verdecchia, Rebecca M. Harrington, Renqi Lu, Yuyang Tan, Yapei Ye, Jizhou Tang\",\"doi\":\"10.1029/2024JB030279\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Characterizing seismic responses to hydraulic fracturing (HF) in shale-gas development is crucial for seismic-hazard assessment and mitigation-strategy design. Although intensive HF operations have led to severe induced seismic hazards in the Changning shale gas field (CSF) in China for over a decade, the typical spatiotemporal characteristics of induced seismicity during and after HF in this region remain unclear, due to a lack of detailed fluid-injection data. Using a 70-day-long dense deployment of 336 nodal-sensors in 2019, we develop an enhanced seismicity catalog and combine it with focal mechanism solutions, fluid-injection time series, seismic-reflection profiles, and geomechanical models to identify the distinct shallow and deep seismicity responses to HF. The first pattern consists of deep earthquake clusters that migrate along strike-slip faults in the limestone formation ∼1 km below the treatment depth. These clusters contain frequent <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <msub>\\n <mi>M</mi>\\n <mi>L</mi>\\n </msub>\\n <mo>></mo>\\n <mn>2</mn>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation> ${M}_{\\\\mathrm{L}} > 2$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> earthquakes, including the largest <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <msub>\\n <mi>M</mi>\\n <mi>L</mi>\\n </msub>\\n <mn>3.3</mn>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation> ${M}_{\\\\mathrm{L}}3.3$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> event, and exhibit transient seismicity-rate changes in rapid response to HF. In contrast, the second pattern consists of shallow clusters in the target shale formation that persist for over a year following HF. The shallow clusters include smaller earthquakes and exhibit thrust-style faulting with no discernible spatial migration. Our geomechanical simulations suggest the deep fault reactivation is best explained by the combined effects of poroelastic-stress loading and pore-pressure increases. Stable seismicity rate and frequent casing deformation indicate post-HF, long-term aseismic deformation may drive the shallow seismicity. These distinct seismic responses during and after HF operations underscore the need for a spatiotemporally adaptive hazard mitigation strategy for the CSF.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15864,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth\",\"volume\":\"130 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024JB030279\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024JB030279","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Shallow Lingering and Deep Transient Seismicity Related to Hydraulic Fracturing in the Changning Shale Gas Field, Sichuan Basin, China
Characterizing seismic responses to hydraulic fracturing (HF) in shale-gas development is crucial for seismic-hazard assessment and mitigation-strategy design. Although intensive HF operations have led to severe induced seismic hazards in the Changning shale gas field (CSF) in China for over a decade, the typical spatiotemporal characteristics of induced seismicity during and after HF in this region remain unclear, due to a lack of detailed fluid-injection data. Using a 70-day-long dense deployment of 336 nodal-sensors in 2019, we develop an enhanced seismicity catalog and combine it with focal mechanism solutions, fluid-injection time series, seismic-reflection profiles, and geomechanical models to identify the distinct shallow and deep seismicity responses to HF. The first pattern consists of deep earthquake clusters that migrate along strike-slip faults in the limestone formation ∼1 km below the treatment depth. These clusters contain frequent earthquakes, including the largest event, and exhibit transient seismicity-rate changes in rapid response to HF. In contrast, the second pattern consists of shallow clusters in the target shale formation that persist for over a year following HF. The shallow clusters include smaller earthquakes and exhibit thrust-style faulting with no discernible spatial migration. Our geomechanical simulations suggest the deep fault reactivation is best explained by the combined effects of poroelastic-stress loading and pore-pressure increases. Stable seismicity rate and frequent casing deformation indicate post-HF, long-term aseismic deformation may drive the shallow seismicity. These distinct seismic responses during and after HF operations underscore the need for a spatiotemporally adaptive hazard mitigation strategy for the CSF.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth serves as the premier publication for the breadth of solid Earth geophysics including (in alphabetical order): electromagnetic methods; exploration geophysics; geodesy and gravity; geodynamics, rheology, and plate kinematics; geomagnetism and paleomagnetism; hydrogeophysics; Instruments, techniques, and models; solid Earth interactions with the cryosphere, atmosphere, oceans, and climate; marine geology and geophysics; natural and anthropogenic hazards; near surface geophysics; petrology, geochemistry, and mineralogy; planet Earth physics and chemistry; rock mechanics and deformation; seismology; tectonophysics; and volcanology.
JGR: Solid Earth has long distinguished itself as the venue for publication of Research Articles backed solidly by data and as well as presenting theoretical and numerical developments with broad applications. Research Articles published in JGR: Solid Earth have had long-term impacts in their fields.
JGR: Solid Earth provides a venue for special issues and special themes based on conferences, workshops, and community initiatives. JGR: Solid Earth also publishes Commentaries on research and emerging trends in the field; these are commissioned by the editors, and suggestion are welcome.