以植物为基础的自然解决方案对沿海洪水风险缓解的有效性建模

IF 3 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Yengi Emmanuel Daro Justine, Avidesh Seenath
{"title":"以植物为基础的自然解决方案对沿海洪水风险缓解的有效性建模","authors":"Yengi Emmanuel Daro Justine,&nbsp;Avidesh Seenath","doi":"10.1111/jfr3.70046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Traditional grey solutions, such as seawalls, are increasingly recognised as being unsustainable for long-term coastal flood risk management, due to high costs and negative environmental impacts. In response, vegetative nature-based coastal solutions (NBCS), such as saltmarshes, are being increasingly proposed as a more sustainable alternative with wider environmental benefits. However, there is considerable uncertainty on the longevity of such solutions under sea-level rise. We, therefore, examine the effectiveness of vegetative NBCS for mitigating coastal flood risk through scenario modelling using a verified <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mtext>LISFLOOD-FP</mtext>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$$ LISFLOOD\\hbox{-} FP $$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> model for Absecon Island in New Jersey, USA. Specifically, we simulate various experimental vegetative NBCS scenarios, each designed to represent a saltmarsh system (young, mid-age, and old), under alternative sea-level conditions. Our results show that these solutions have a marginal influence on flood extent, depth, velocity, and timing under current and future projected sea-level conditions. These findings suggest that reliance on vegetative NBCS <i>may not</i> be sustainable for long-term coastal flood risk management, particularly under climate change. We discuss the wider implications of these findings and identify future research pathways towards improving and informing more robust coastal flood risk management decisions.</p>","PeriodicalId":49294,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Flood Risk Management","volume":"18 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jfr3.70046","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modelling the Effectiveness of Vegetative Nature-Based Solutions for Coastal Flood Risk Mitigation\",\"authors\":\"Yengi Emmanuel Daro Justine,&nbsp;Avidesh Seenath\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jfr3.70046\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Traditional grey solutions, such as seawalls, are increasingly recognised as being unsustainable for long-term coastal flood risk management, due to high costs and negative environmental impacts. In response, vegetative nature-based coastal solutions (NBCS), such as saltmarshes, are being increasingly proposed as a more sustainable alternative with wider environmental benefits. However, there is considerable uncertainty on the longevity of such solutions under sea-level rise. We, therefore, examine the effectiveness of vegetative NBCS for mitigating coastal flood risk through scenario modelling using a verified <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <mtext>LISFLOOD-FP</mtext>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation>$$ LISFLOOD\\\\hbox{-} FP $$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> model for Absecon Island in New Jersey, USA. Specifically, we simulate various experimental vegetative NBCS scenarios, each designed to represent a saltmarsh system (young, mid-age, and old), under alternative sea-level conditions. Our results show that these solutions have a marginal influence on flood extent, depth, velocity, and timing under current and future projected sea-level conditions. These findings suggest that reliance on vegetative NBCS <i>may not</i> be sustainable for long-term coastal flood risk management, particularly under climate change. We discuss the wider implications of these findings and identify future research pathways towards improving and informing more robust coastal flood risk management decisions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49294,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Flood Risk Management\",\"volume\":\"18 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jfr3.70046\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Flood Risk Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jfr3.70046\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Flood Risk Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jfr3.70046","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

传统的灰色解决方案,如海堤,越来越被认为是不可持续的长期沿海洪水风险管理,由于高成本和负面的环境影响。因此,以自然为基础的植物性沿海解决方案(NBCS),如盐沼,越来越多地被提出作为一种更具可持续性的替代方案,具有更广泛的环境效益。然而,在海平面上升的情况下,这些解决方案的寿命存在相当大的不确定性。因此,我们在美国新泽西州Absecon岛使用经过验证的LISFLOOD-FP $$ LISFLOOD\hbox{-} FP $$模型,通过情景建模来检验植物性NBCS减轻沿海洪水风险的有效性。具体来说,我们模拟了不同的实验性植物性NBCS场景,每个场景都被设计为代表不同海平面条件下的盐沼系统(年轻、中年和老年)。我们的结果表明,在当前和未来预测的海平面条件下,这些解决方案对洪水的范围、深度、速度和时间有边际影响。这些发现表明,对于长期的沿海洪水风险管理来说,依赖植物性NBCS可能是不可持续的,尤其是在气候变化的情况下。我们讨论了这些发现的更广泛的影响,并确定了未来的研究途径,以改善和告知更强大的沿海洪水风险管理决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Modelling the Effectiveness of Vegetative Nature-Based Solutions for Coastal Flood Risk Mitigation

Modelling the Effectiveness of Vegetative Nature-Based Solutions for Coastal Flood Risk Mitigation

Traditional grey solutions, such as seawalls, are increasingly recognised as being unsustainable for long-term coastal flood risk management, due to high costs and negative environmental impacts. In response, vegetative nature-based coastal solutions (NBCS), such as saltmarshes, are being increasingly proposed as a more sustainable alternative with wider environmental benefits. However, there is considerable uncertainty on the longevity of such solutions under sea-level rise. We, therefore, examine the effectiveness of vegetative NBCS for mitigating coastal flood risk through scenario modelling using a verified LISFLOOD-FP $$ LISFLOOD\hbox{-} FP $$ model for Absecon Island in New Jersey, USA. Specifically, we simulate various experimental vegetative NBCS scenarios, each designed to represent a saltmarsh system (young, mid-age, and old), under alternative sea-level conditions. Our results show that these solutions have a marginal influence on flood extent, depth, velocity, and timing under current and future projected sea-level conditions. These findings suggest that reliance on vegetative NBCS may not be sustainable for long-term coastal flood risk management, particularly under climate change. We discuss the wider implications of these findings and identify future research pathways towards improving and informing more robust coastal flood risk management decisions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Flood Risk Management
Journal of Flood Risk Management ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES-WATER RESOURCES
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
7.30%
发文量
93
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Flood Risk Management provides an international platform for knowledge sharing in all areas related to flood risk. Its explicit aim is to disseminate ideas across the range of disciplines where flood related research is carried out and it provides content ranging from leading edge academic papers to applied content with the practitioner in mind. Readers and authors come from a wide background and include hydrologists, meteorologists, geographers, geomorphologists, conservationists, civil engineers, social scientists, policy makers, insurers and practitioners. They share an interest in managing the complex interactions between the many skills and disciplines that underpin the management of flood risk across the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信