高血压患者访诊血压变异性与房颤发生率之间的关系:SPRINT试验的事后分析

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Guixin Liu, Ning Wang, Keyang Zheng, Wenli Cheng
{"title":"高血压患者访诊血压变异性与房颤发生率之间的关系:SPRINT试验的事后分析","authors":"Guixin Liu,&nbsp;Ning Wang,&nbsp;Keyang Zheng,&nbsp;Wenli Cheng","doi":"10.1111/jch.70052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Visit-to-visit blood pressure variability (BPV) has been recognized as a cardiovascular risk factor, but its association with new-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) remains underexplored. This study investigated the relationship between BPV and AF incidence among hypertensive patients using data from the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT). Visit-to-visit BPV was quantified using standard deviation (SD), coefficient of variation (CV), and average real variability (ARV) of systolic and diastolic blood pressure measurements. Participants were stratified into three groups based on systolic BPV tertiles. AF cases were identified via follow-up electrocardiograms and reports of AF-related serious adverse events. After excluding individuals with baseline AF or missing BPV data, 7378 patients were analyzed over a median follow-up of 3.8 years. The incidence of new-onset AF increased across ascending tertiles of systolic BPV (CV), with rates of 2.5% (62 cases), 4.1% (104 cases), and 5.2% (127 cases) observed in the lowest to highest tertiles, respectively. After adjusting for age, race, blood pressure, and cardiovascular risk factors, the hazard ratios for AF in the second and third tertiles compared to the lowest tertile were 1.52 (95% CI: 1.10–2.09) and 1.83 (95% CI: 1.34–2.49), respectively. Consistent trends were noted for systolic BPV measured via SD and ARV, as well as diastolic BPV. These findings indicate that elevated visit-to-visit BPV independently predicts AF development in hypertensive populations. Assessing BPV may enhance risk stratification and identify patients at heightened risk for AF, underscoring its clinical relevance in hypertension management.</p>","PeriodicalId":50237,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Hypertension","volume":"27 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jch.70052","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association Between Visit-to-Visit Blood Pressure Variability and Incidence of Atrial Fibrillation in Hypertensive Patients: A Post-Hoc Analysis of the SPRINT Trial\",\"authors\":\"Guixin Liu,&nbsp;Ning Wang,&nbsp;Keyang Zheng,&nbsp;Wenli Cheng\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jch.70052\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Visit-to-visit blood pressure variability (BPV) has been recognized as a cardiovascular risk factor, but its association with new-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) remains underexplored. This study investigated the relationship between BPV and AF incidence among hypertensive patients using data from the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT). Visit-to-visit BPV was quantified using standard deviation (SD), coefficient of variation (CV), and average real variability (ARV) of systolic and diastolic blood pressure measurements. Participants were stratified into three groups based on systolic BPV tertiles. AF cases were identified via follow-up electrocardiograms and reports of AF-related serious adverse events. After excluding individuals with baseline AF or missing BPV data, 7378 patients were analyzed over a median follow-up of 3.8 years. The incidence of new-onset AF increased across ascending tertiles of systolic BPV (CV), with rates of 2.5% (62 cases), 4.1% (104 cases), and 5.2% (127 cases) observed in the lowest to highest tertiles, respectively. After adjusting for age, race, blood pressure, and cardiovascular risk factors, the hazard ratios for AF in the second and third tertiles compared to the lowest tertile were 1.52 (95% CI: 1.10–2.09) and 1.83 (95% CI: 1.34–2.49), respectively. Consistent trends were noted for systolic BPV measured via SD and ARV, as well as diastolic BPV. These findings indicate that elevated visit-to-visit BPV independently predicts AF development in hypertensive populations. Assessing BPV may enhance risk stratification and identify patients at heightened risk for AF, underscoring its clinical relevance in hypertension management.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50237,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Hypertension\",\"volume\":\"27 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jch.70052\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Hypertension\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jch.70052\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Hypertension","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jch.70052","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

就诊血压变异性(BPV)已被认为是心血管危险因素,但其与新发心房颤动(AF)的关系仍未得到充分探讨。本研究利用收缩压干预试验(SPRINT)的数据调查高血压患者BPV与房颤发病率之间的关系。采用收缩压和舒张压测量值的标准差(SD)、变异系数(CV)和平均真实变异性(ARV)对访间BPV进行量化。参与者根据收缩期BPV分位数分为三组。通过随访心电图和AF相关严重不良事件的报告来确定AF病例。在排除基线房颤或遗漏BPV数据的个体后,7378例患者在中位3.8年的随访期间进行了分析。在收缩期BPV (CV)升高的三分位数中,新发房颤的发生率分别为2.5%(62例)、4.1%(104例)和5.2%(127例)。在调整了年龄、种族、血压和心血管危险因素后,第二和第三分位与最低分位相比,心房颤动的危险比分别为1.52 (95% CI: 1.10-2.09)和1.83 (95% CI: 1.34-2.49)。通过SD和ARV测量收缩期BPV以及舒张期BPV的趋势一致。这些发现表明,每次就诊BPV升高独立预测高血压人群房颤的发展。评估BPV可以加强风险分层,识别AF高风险患者,强调其在高血压管理中的临床意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Association Between Visit-to-Visit Blood Pressure Variability and Incidence of Atrial Fibrillation in Hypertensive Patients: A Post-Hoc Analysis of the SPRINT Trial

Association Between Visit-to-Visit Blood Pressure Variability and Incidence of Atrial Fibrillation in Hypertensive Patients: A Post-Hoc Analysis of the SPRINT Trial

Visit-to-visit blood pressure variability (BPV) has been recognized as a cardiovascular risk factor, but its association with new-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) remains underexplored. This study investigated the relationship between BPV and AF incidence among hypertensive patients using data from the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT). Visit-to-visit BPV was quantified using standard deviation (SD), coefficient of variation (CV), and average real variability (ARV) of systolic and diastolic blood pressure measurements. Participants were stratified into three groups based on systolic BPV tertiles. AF cases were identified via follow-up electrocardiograms and reports of AF-related serious adverse events. After excluding individuals with baseline AF or missing BPV data, 7378 patients were analyzed over a median follow-up of 3.8 years. The incidence of new-onset AF increased across ascending tertiles of systolic BPV (CV), with rates of 2.5% (62 cases), 4.1% (104 cases), and 5.2% (127 cases) observed in the lowest to highest tertiles, respectively. After adjusting for age, race, blood pressure, and cardiovascular risk factors, the hazard ratios for AF in the second and third tertiles compared to the lowest tertile were 1.52 (95% CI: 1.10–2.09) and 1.83 (95% CI: 1.34–2.49), respectively. Consistent trends were noted for systolic BPV measured via SD and ARV, as well as diastolic BPV. These findings indicate that elevated visit-to-visit BPV independently predicts AF development in hypertensive populations. Assessing BPV may enhance risk stratification and identify patients at heightened risk for AF, underscoring its clinical relevance in hypertension management.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Hypertension
Journal of Clinical Hypertension PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
7.10%
发文量
191
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Hypertension is a peer-reviewed, monthly publication that serves internists, cardiologists, nephrologists, endocrinologists, hypertension specialists, primary care practitioners, pharmacists and all professionals interested in hypertension by providing objective, up-to-date information and practical recommendations on the full range of clinical aspects of hypertension. Commentaries and columns by experts in the field provide further insights into our original research articles as well as on major articles published elsewhere. Major guidelines for the management of hypertension are also an important feature of the Journal. Through its partnership with the World Hypertension League, JCH will include a new focus on hypertension and public health, including major policy issues, that features research and reviews related to disease characteristics and management at the population level.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信