Mohamed Dafaalla, Nicholas Weight, Muhammad Rashid, James Nolan, Mamas A. Mamas
{"title":"2005 - 2019年社会经济差异对STEMI癌症患者治疗和预后的影响一项英国全国性研究","authors":"Mohamed Dafaalla, Nicholas Weight, Muhammad Rashid, James Nolan, Mamas A. Mamas","doi":"10.1002/clc.70135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>While current evidence suggests that the clinical outcomes of STEMI are worse among patients with cancer, it is unknown what role the patient's socioeconomic status plays.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A nationally linked cohort of STEMI patients (January 2005 to March 2019) was obtained from the MINAP and UK national Hospital Episode Statistics (HES APC) registries. Socioeconomic status was measured using Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) score divided into 5 quintiles (quintile 1: most affluent, quintile 5: most deprived). The impact of socioeconomic status on clinical outcomes was assessed using Cox-proportional-hazard and competing risk models.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 8459 STEMI admissions with cancer were identified between 01/01/2005 and 30/03/2019 with 1577 patients (18%) from the most deprived quintile. Patients from the most deprived quintile were more frequently female (quintile 5; 29% vs. quintile 1; 24%) and from ethnic minorities (quintile 5; 8% vs. quintile 1; 2%). They were less likely to receive PCI between 2005 and 2009. By 2018 PCI use was higher in quintile 5 (quintile 5; 84% vs. quintile 1;81%). The odds of death at1year was not higher in the most deprived patients. The risk of death was significantly higher at 5 years post-discharge (HR 1.27, 95% CI 1.10−1.47).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The socioeconomic status impact on outcomes of STEMI patients with cancer can be minimized by delivering equitable inpatient care, particularly PCI. While patients from the most deprived areas have similar odds of survival in the short-term, they have lower probability of survival in the long-term.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10201,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Cardiology","volume":"48 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/clc.70135","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Socioeconomic Disparities on Care and Outcomes of Cancer Patients Presenting With STEMI Between 2005 and 2019; a Nationwide British Study\",\"authors\":\"Mohamed Dafaalla, Nicholas Weight, Muhammad Rashid, James Nolan, Mamas A. Mamas\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/clc.70135\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>While current evidence suggests that the clinical outcomes of STEMI are worse among patients with cancer, it is unknown what role the patient's socioeconomic status plays.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A nationally linked cohort of STEMI patients (January 2005 to March 2019) was obtained from the MINAP and UK national Hospital Episode Statistics (HES APC) registries. Socioeconomic status was measured using Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) score divided into 5 quintiles (quintile 1: most affluent, quintile 5: most deprived). The impact of socioeconomic status on clinical outcomes was assessed using Cox-proportional-hazard and competing risk models.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>A total of 8459 STEMI admissions with cancer were identified between 01/01/2005 and 30/03/2019 with 1577 patients (18%) from the most deprived quintile. Patients from the most deprived quintile were more frequently female (quintile 5; 29% vs. quintile 1; 24%) and from ethnic minorities (quintile 5; 8% vs. quintile 1; 2%). They were less likely to receive PCI between 2005 and 2009. By 2018 PCI use was higher in quintile 5 (quintile 5; 84% vs. quintile 1;81%). The odds of death at1year was not higher in the most deprived patients. The risk of death was significantly higher at 5 years post-discharge (HR 1.27, 95% CI 1.10−1.47).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>The socioeconomic status impact on outcomes of STEMI patients with cancer can be minimized by delivering equitable inpatient care, particularly PCI. While patients from the most deprived areas have similar odds of survival in the short-term, they have lower probability of survival in the long-term.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10201,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Cardiology\",\"volume\":\"48 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/clc.70135\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/clc.70135\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/clc.70135","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
虽然目前的证据表明STEMI在癌症患者中的临床结果更差,但尚不清楚患者的社会经济地位在其中起什么作用。方法从MINAP和英国国家医院事件统计(HES APC)登记处获得STEMI患者的全国相关队列(2005年1月至2019年3月)。社会经济地位的衡量使用多重剥夺指数(IMD)得分分为5个五分位数(五分位数1:最富裕,五分位数5:最贫困)。使用Cox-proportional-hazard和competing risk模型评估社会经济地位对临床结果的影响。结果在2005年1月1日至2019年3月30日期间,共有8459例STEMI入院患者确诊为癌症,其中1577例(18%)来自最贫困的五分之一。最贫困的五分位数的患者更多是女性(五分位数5;29% vs. 1分之一;24%)和少数民族(五分之一;8% vs. 1;2%)。在2005年至2009年间,他们接受PCI的可能性较低。到2018年,PCI使用率较高的五分之一(五分之一;84% vs. 1分位数;81%)。在最贫困的患者中,1年死亡的几率并不高。出院后5年死亡风险显著增高(HR 1.27, 95% CI 1.10−1.47)。社会经济地位对STEMI合并癌症患者预后的影响可以通过提供公平的住院护理,特别是PCI来最小化。虽然来自最贫困地区的患者在短期内有相似的生存几率,但从长期来看,他们的生存几率较低。
Impact of Socioeconomic Disparities on Care and Outcomes of Cancer Patients Presenting With STEMI Between 2005 and 2019; a Nationwide British Study
Background
While current evidence suggests that the clinical outcomes of STEMI are worse among patients with cancer, it is unknown what role the patient's socioeconomic status plays.
Methods
A nationally linked cohort of STEMI patients (January 2005 to March 2019) was obtained from the MINAP and UK national Hospital Episode Statistics (HES APC) registries. Socioeconomic status was measured using Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) score divided into 5 quintiles (quintile 1: most affluent, quintile 5: most deprived). The impact of socioeconomic status on clinical outcomes was assessed using Cox-proportional-hazard and competing risk models.
Results
A total of 8459 STEMI admissions with cancer were identified between 01/01/2005 and 30/03/2019 with 1577 patients (18%) from the most deprived quintile. Patients from the most deprived quintile were more frequently female (quintile 5; 29% vs. quintile 1; 24%) and from ethnic minorities (quintile 5; 8% vs. quintile 1; 2%). They were less likely to receive PCI between 2005 and 2009. By 2018 PCI use was higher in quintile 5 (quintile 5; 84% vs. quintile 1;81%). The odds of death at1year was not higher in the most deprived patients. The risk of death was significantly higher at 5 years post-discharge (HR 1.27, 95% CI 1.10−1.47).
Conclusions
The socioeconomic status impact on outcomes of STEMI patients with cancer can be minimized by delivering equitable inpatient care, particularly PCI. While patients from the most deprived areas have similar odds of survival in the short-term, they have lower probability of survival in the long-term.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Cardiology provides a fully Gold Open Access forum for the publication of original clinical research, as well as brief reviews of diagnostic and therapeutic issues in cardiovascular medicine and cardiovascular surgery.
The journal includes Clinical Investigations, Reviews, free standing editorials and commentaries, and bonus online-only content.
The journal also publishes supplements, Expert Panel Discussions, sponsored clinical Reviews, Trial Designs, and Quality and Outcomes.