膜蛋白高分辨率结构的比较分析

IF 1.1 Q4 CELL BIOLOGY
S. A. Zhuravlev, A. S. Kazantsev, S. D. Ivashchenko, D. D. Kuklina, Y. L. Ryzhykau
{"title":"膜蛋白高分辨率结构的比较分析","authors":"S. A. Zhuravlev,&nbsp;A. S. Kazantsev,&nbsp;S. D. Ivashchenko,&nbsp;D. D. Kuklina,&nbsp;Y. L. Ryzhykau","doi":"10.1134/S1990747824700594","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper presents a statistical analysis and comparison of all existing as of November 20, 2024 membrane protein structures that are represented in the most widely used databases mpstruc, Orientations of Proteins in Membranes (OPM), SCOP and PDBTM, with the total number of structures now reaching 13956. We evaluated the resolution dependencies of structure-derived membrane proteins on their size-related physical characteristics, such as molecular weight, radius and size of the hydrophilic part. Based on the obtained dependencies, we compared the resolving methods of X-ray diffraction and electron microscopy structures, and also compared the methods of protein crystallization <i>in surfo</i> and <i>in meso</i>. The change over time in the number of membrane protein structures obtained by different methods was also examined to analyze trends in structural biology. In 2024, cryo-electron microscopy has emerged as the dominant method, contributing to nearly half of the solved structures, now representing 49.6% of the total. The obtained results demonstrate that the resolution of structures obtained by X-ray diffraction on protein crystals, on average, tends to worsen with increasing protein size, while in electron microscopy, which has recently gained enormous popularity, there is no such trend, but the average resolution is worse. It was also shown that the character of the dependence of resolution on protein size is the same (within error) for the two most common methods of membrane proteins crystallization: in lipid cubic phases (<i>in meso</i>) and in detergent micelles (<i>in surfo</i>). Thus, statistically, neither of these two methods can be considered a priori preferable for achieving better resolution.</p>","PeriodicalId":484,"journal":{"name":"Biochemistry (Moscow), Supplement Series A: Membrane and Cell Biology","volume":"19 1","pages":"145 - 149"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Analysis of High-Resolution Structures of Membrane Proteins\",\"authors\":\"S. A. Zhuravlev,&nbsp;A. S. Kazantsev,&nbsp;S. D. Ivashchenko,&nbsp;D. D. Kuklina,&nbsp;Y. L. Ryzhykau\",\"doi\":\"10.1134/S1990747824700594\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This paper presents a statistical analysis and comparison of all existing as of November 20, 2024 membrane protein structures that are represented in the most widely used databases mpstruc, Orientations of Proteins in Membranes (OPM), SCOP and PDBTM, with the total number of structures now reaching 13956. We evaluated the resolution dependencies of structure-derived membrane proteins on their size-related physical characteristics, such as molecular weight, radius and size of the hydrophilic part. Based on the obtained dependencies, we compared the resolving methods of X-ray diffraction and electron microscopy structures, and also compared the methods of protein crystallization <i>in surfo</i> and <i>in meso</i>. The change over time in the number of membrane protein structures obtained by different methods was also examined to analyze trends in structural biology. In 2024, cryo-electron microscopy has emerged as the dominant method, contributing to nearly half of the solved structures, now representing 49.6% of the total. The obtained results demonstrate that the resolution of structures obtained by X-ray diffraction on protein crystals, on average, tends to worsen with increasing protein size, while in electron microscopy, which has recently gained enormous popularity, there is no such trend, but the average resolution is worse. It was also shown that the character of the dependence of resolution on protein size is the same (within error) for the two most common methods of membrane proteins crystallization: in lipid cubic phases (<i>in meso</i>) and in detergent micelles (<i>in surfo</i>). Thus, statistically, neither of these two methods can be considered a priori preferable for achieving better resolution.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":484,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biochemistry (Moscow), Supplement Series A: Membrane and Cell Biology\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"145 - 149\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biochemistry (Moscow), Supplement Series A: Membrane and Cell Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"2\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1134/S1990747824700594\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CELL BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biochemistry (Moscow), Supplement Series A: Membrane and Cell Biology","FirstCategoryId":"2","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1134/S1990747824700594","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CELL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文对目前应用最广泛的数据库mpstrucc、OPM、SCOP和PDBTM中存在的2024个膜蛋白结构进行了统计分析和比较,共计13956个结构。我们评估了结构衍生膜蛋白的分辨率依赖于其大小相关的物理特性,如分子量、半径和亲水性部分的大小。基于所获得的依赖关系,我们比较了x射线衍射和电子显微镜结构的分辨方法,并比较了表面和介观中的蛋白质结晶方法。通过不同方法获得的膜蛋白结构的数量随时间的变化也进行了检查,以分析结构生物学的趋势。2024年,低温电子显微镜已成为主导方法,贡献了近一半的已解决结构,现在占总数的49.6%。所得结果表明,x射线衍射在蛋白质晶体上获得的结构分辨率,随着蛋白质尺寸的增加,平均有变差的趋势,而在最近非常普及的电子显微镜上,没有这种趋势,但平均分辨率变差了。研究还表明,对于两种最常见的膜蛋白结晶方法:脂质立方相(中观)和洗涤剂胶束(中观),分辨率对蛋白质大小的依赖特征是相同的(在误差范围内)。因此,从统计学上讲,这两种方法都不能被认为是获得更好分辨率的先验选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative Analysis of High-Resolution Structures of Membrane Proteins

This paper presents a statistical analysis and comparison of all existing as of November 20, 2024 membrane protein structures that are represented in the most widely used databases mpstruc, Orientations of Proteins in Membranes (OPM), SCOP and PDBTM, with the total number of structures now reaching 13956. We evaluated the resolution dependencies of structure-derived membrane proteins on their size-related physical characteristics, such as molecular weight, radius and size of the hydrophilic part. Based on the obtained dependencies, we compared the resolving methods of X-ray diffraction and electron microscopy structures, and also compared the methods of protein crystallization in surfo and in meso. The change over time in the number of membrane protein structures obtained by different methods was also examined to analyze trends in structural biology. In 2024, cryo-electron microscopy has emerged as the dominant method, contributing to nearly half of the solved structures, now representing 49.6% of the total. The obtained results demonstrate that the resolution of structures obtained by X-ray diffraction on protein crystals, on average, tends to worsen with increasing protein size, while in electron microscopy, which has recently gained enormous popularity, there is no such trend, but the average resolution is worse. It was also shown that the character of the dependence of resolution on protein size is the same (within error) for the two most common methods of membrane proteins crystallization: in lipid cubic phases (in meso) and in detergent micelles (in surfo). Thus, statistically, neither of these two methods can be considered a priori preferable for achieving better resolution.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: Biochemistry (Moscow), Supplement Series A: Membrane and Cell Biology   is an international peer reviewed journal that publishes original articles on physical, chemical, and molecular mechanisms that underlie basic properties of biological membranes and mediate membrane-related cellular functions. The primary topics of the journal are membrane structure, mechanisms of membrane transport, bioenergetics and photobiology, intracellular signaling as well as membrane aspects of cell biology, immunology, and medicine. The journal is multidisciplinary and gives preference to those articles that employ a variety of experimental approaches, basically in biophysics but also in biochemistry, cytology, and molecular biology. The journal publishes articles that strive for unveiling membrane and cellular functions through innovative theoretical models and computer simulations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信