预测饮食失调缓解的认知行为疗法早期改变指标

IF 4.2 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Tracey D. Wade , Neophytos Georgiou , Ella Keegan , Mia L. Pellizzer , Glenn Waller
{"title":"预测饮食失调缓解的认知行为疗法早期改变指标","authors":"Tracey D. Wade ,&nbsp;Neophytos Georgiou ,&nbsp;Ella Keegan ,&nbsp;Mia L. Pellizzer ,&nbsp;Glenn Waller","doi":"10.1016/j.brat.2025.104754","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We examined the utility of three definitions of rapid response to treatment for predicting remission in a transdiagnostic sample receiving 10-session cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) for an eating disorder. Both efficiency (categorising the greatest number of people as rapid responders) and predictiveness (performs best in predicting outcomes) were compared. The participants (<em>N</em> = 176, 93 % female, 89 % white, mean age 26.65 years) completed measures at baseline and before session 4 of CBT which was used to calculate rapid response. Remission was achieved by 64 participants (36 %) at the end of therapy. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to examine the contribution of rapid response, as well as baseline disordered eating, impairment, general negative emotion, to remission status. Two of the rapid response definitions were associated with participants being 2.5 times more likely to achieve remission at end of treatment. In both cases, remission was also associated with a lower level of baseline eating disorder psychopathology. The preferred definition (a reduction of ≥1.13 points on the Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire) categorised 58 % of participants as rapid responders. These findings can be used to inform clinicians of meaningful early change that predicts positive outcomes in brief CBT for eating disorders. Early change indicators can inform collaborative consideration of barriers to progress and approaches to tackle these, making CBT more effective for more people. The conclusions should be interpreted with caution given remission was only examined at end of treatment and not over longer-term follow-up.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48457,"journal":{"name":"Behaviour Research and Therapy","volume":"190 ","pages":"Article 104754"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Indicators of early change in cognitive behaviour therapy that predict eating disorder remission\",\"authors\":\"Tracey D. Wade ,&nbsp;Neophytos Georgiou ,&nbsp;Ella Keegan ,&nbsp;Mia L. Pellizzer ,&nbsp;Glenn Waller\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.brat.2025.104754\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>We examined the utility of three definitions of rapid response to treatment for predicting remission in a transdiagnostic sample receiving 10-session cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) for an eating disorder. Both efficiency (categorising the greatest number of people as rapid responders) and predictiveness (performs best in predicting outcomes) were compared. The participants (<em>N</em> = 176, 93 % female, 89 % white, mean age 26.65 years) completed measures at baseline and before session 4 of CBT which was used to calculate rapid response. Remission was achieved by 64 participants (36 %) at the end of therapy. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to examine the contribution of rapid response, as well as baseline disordered eating, impairment, general negative emotion, to remission status. Two of the rapid response definitions were associated with participants being 2.5 times more likely to achieve remission at end of treatment. In both cases, remission was also associated with a lower level of baseline eating disorder psychopathology. The preferred definition (a reduction of ≥1.13 points on the Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire) categorised 58 % of participants as rapid responders. These findings can be used to inform clinicians of meaningful early change that predicts positive outcomes in brief CBT for eating disorders. Early change indicators can inform collaborative consideration of barriers to progress and approaches to tackle these, making CBT more effective for more people. The conclusions should be interpreted with caution given remission was only examined at end of treatment and not over longer-term follow-up.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48457,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Behaviour Research and Therapy\",\"volume\":\"190 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104754\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Behaviour Research and Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0005796725000762\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behaviour Research and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0005796725000762","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们研究了在接受10期认知行为疗法(CBT)治疗饮食失调的跨诊断样本中预测缓解的三种治疗快速反应定义的效用。效率(将最多的人归类为快速反应者)和预见性(在预测结果方面表现最好)进行了比较。参与者(N = 176, 93%女性,89%白人,平均年龄26.65岁)完成了基线和CBT第4期之前的测量,用于计算快速反应。64名参与者(36%)在治疗结束时达到缓解。采用多变量logistic回归分析来检验快速反应以及基线饮食失调、损害、一般负面情绪对缓解状态的贡献。两种快速反应定义与参与者在治疗结束时达到缓解的可能性增加2.5倍有关。在这两种情况下,缓解也与较低的基线饮食障碍精神病理学水平有关。首选定义(饮食失调检查问卷减少≥1.13分)将58%的参与者归类为快速反应者。这些发现可以用来告知临床医生有意义的早期变化,预测简短的饮食失调CBT的积极结果。早期的变化指标可以告知协作考虑进展的障碍和解决这些障碍的方法,使CBT对更多的人更有效。考虑到缓解仅在治疗结束时检查,而不是在长期随访中检查,结论应谨慎解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Indicators of early change in cognitive behaviour therapy that predict eating disorder remission
We examined the utility of three definitions of rapid response to treatment for predicting remission in a transdiagnostic sample receiving 10-session cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) for an eating disorder. Both efficiency (categorising the greatest number of people as rapid responders) and predictiveness (performs best in predicting outcomes) were compared. The participants (N = 176, 93 % female, 89 % white, mean age 26.65 years) completed measures at baseline and before session 4 of CBT which was used to calculate rapid response. Remission was achieved by 64 participants (36 %) at the end of therapy. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to examine the contribution of rapid response, as well as baseline disordered eating, impairment, general negative emotion, to remission status. Two of the rapid response definitions were associated with participants being 2.5 times more likely to achieve remission at end of treatment. In both cases, remission was also associated with a lower level of baseline eating disorder psychopathology. The preferred definition (a reduction of ≥1.13 points on the Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire) categorised 58 % of participants as rapid responders. These findings can be used to inform clinicians of meaningful early change that predicts positive outcomes in brief CBT for eating disorders. Early change indicators can inform collaborative consideration of barriers to progress and approaches to tackle these, making CBT more effective for more people. The conclusions should be interpreted with caution given remission was only examined at end of treatment and not over longer-term follow-up.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Behaviour Research and Therapy
Behaviour Research and Therapy PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
7.30%
发文量
148
期刊介绍: The major focus of Behaviour Research and Therapy is an experimental psychopathology approach to understanding emotional and behavioral disorders and their prevention and treatment, using cognitive, behavioral, and psychophysiological (including neural) methods and models. This includes laboratory-based experimental studies with healthy, at risk and subclinical individuals that inform clinical application as well as studies with clinically severe samples. The following types of submissions are encouraged: theoretical reviews of mechanisms that contribute to psychopathology and that offer new treatment targets; tests of novel, mechanistically focused psychological interventions, especially ones that include theory-driven or experimentally-derived predictors, moderators and mediators; and innovations in dissemination and implementation of evidence-based practices into clinical practice in psychology and associated fields, especially those that target underlying mechanisms or focus on novel approaches to treatment delivery. In addition to traditional psychological disorders, the scope of the journal includes behavioural medicine (e.g., chronic pain). The journal will not consider manuscripts dealing primarily with measurement, psychometric analyses, and personality assessment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信