Xizi Xiao, Xingjian Ma, Anthony D. McDonald, Ranjana K. Mehta
{"title":"是什么导致了对自动驾驶汽车的依赖?对可变自动驾驶汽车性能反应的推理分析","authors":"Xizi Xiao, Xingjian Ma, Anthony D. McDonald, Ranjana K. Mehta","doi":"10.1016/j.apergo.2025.104511","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The appropriate use of automated vehicle technology is pivotal for reducing latent security risks associated with automated driving. Appropriate use demands variability in reliance on the automation—specifically, relying on the automation only when it is capable of similar or better performance than human drivers. The central role of reliance in appropriate use suggests a pressing need to understand the factors that contribute to automation reliance. We address this need through a driving simulator study of 49 participants, where drivers were asked to make reliance decisions with partial vehicle automation technology across four events representative of reliance decisions made in current automated vehicles. We used step-wise logistic regression analysis to assess the role of reliance inertia, situational trust, dispositional trust, situation awareness, and driver demographics on reliance. The results suggest that the factors that influence reliance vary by the traffic scenario, that reliance inertia has the strongest influence on subsequent reliance decisions, and that reliance was more strongly related to situational trust than dispositional trust. These findings suggest a need for technologies that calibrate reliance rather than trust in AVs and for additional broader studies of driver reliance on AV.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55502,"journal":{"name":"Applied Ergonomics","volume":"128 ","pages":"Article 104511"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What leads to reliance on automated vehicles? An inferential analysis of responses to variable AV performance\",\"authors\":\"Xizi Xiao, Xingjian Ma, Anthony D. McDonald, Ranjana K. Mehta\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.apergo.2025.104511\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The appropriate use of automated vehicle technology is pivotal for reducing latent security risks associated with automated driving. Appropriate use demands variability in reliance on the automation—specifically, relying on the automation only when it is capable of similar or better performance than human drivers. The central role of reliance in appropriate use suggests a pressing need to understand the factors that contribute to automation reliance. We address this need through a driving simulator study of 49 participants, where drivers were asked to make reliance decisions with partial vehicle automation technology across four events representative of reliance decisions made in current automated vehicles. We used step-wise logistic regression analysis to assess the role of reliance inertia, situational trust, dispositional trust, situation awareness, and driver demographics on reliance. The results suggest that the factors that influence reliance vary by the traffic scenario, that reliance inertia has the strongest influence on subsequent reliance decisions, and that reliance was more strongly related to situational trust than dispositional trust. These findings suggest a need for technologies that calibrate reliance rather than trust in AVs and for additional broader studies of driver reliance on AV.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55502,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Ergonomics\",\"volume\":\"128 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104511\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Ergonomics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S000368702500047X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Ergonomics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S000368702500047X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
What leads to reliance on automated vehicles? An inferential analysis of responses to variable AV performance
The appropriate use of automated vehicle technology is pivotal for reducing latent security risks associated with automated driving. Appropriate use demands variability in reliance on the automation—specifically, relying on the automation only when it is capable of similar or better performance than human drivers. The central role of reliance in appropriate use suggests a pressing need to understand the factors that contribute to automation reliance. We address this need through a driving simulator study of 49 participants, where drivers were asked to make reliance decisions with partial vehicle automation technology across four events representative of reliance decisions made in current automated vehicles. We used step-wise logistic regression analysis to assess the role of reliance inertia, situational trust, dispositional trust, situation awareness, and driver demographics on reliance. The results suggest that the factors that influence reliance vary by the traffic scenario, that reliance inertia has the strongest influence on subsequent reliance decisions, and that reliance was more strongly related to situational trust than dispositional trust. These findings suggest a need for technologies that calibrate reliance rather than trust in AVs and for additional broader studies of driver reliance on AV.
期刊介绍:
Applied Ergonomics is aimed at ergonomists and all those interested in applying ergonomics/human factors in the design, planning and management of technical and social systems at work or leisure. Readership is truly international with subscribers in over 50 countries. Professionals for whom Applied Ergonomics is of interest include: ergonomists, designers, industrial engineers, health and safety specialists, systems engineers, design engineers, organizational psychologists, occupational health specialists and human-computer interaction specialists.