结合平均值和标准差的统计模型预测现实城市地区行人水平风速的概率分布

IF 7.1 1区 工程技术 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
Wei Wang, Yezhan Li, Naoki Ikegaya
{"title":"结合平均值和标准差的统计模型预测现实城市地区行人水平风速的概率分布","authors":"Wei Wang,&nbsp;Yezhan Li,&nbsp;Naoki Ikegaya","doi":"10.1016/j.buildenv.2025.113034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Understanding the probabilistic characteristics of urban wind environments is crucial for pedestrian safety and comfort. Previous studies have used various distribution functions based on statistics to evaluate gusty winds; however, the prediction accuracy of gusts and plausibility of the various distribution functions have not been discussed. This paper models the probability density function (PDF) using four distribution functions: Gaussian, Lognormal, Weibull, and Gamma, with parameters determined by the method of moments based on only two statistics: mean and standard deviation. The large-eddy simulations (LES) results of a realistic urban case were used to assess their effectiveness in estimating PDFs and quantiles of wind speed. The key findings indicate that while all distributions accurately modeled the mean and standard deviation, none effectively captured skewness and kurtosis. The Gamma distribution provided the best global fit of PDFs, followed by the Weibull distribution. The Lognormal and Gaussian distributions performed less effectively, with the Gaussian distribution showing the largest errors due to its constrained, symmetric bell-shaped PDF, which struggles to capture the asymmetry in wind speed data. Although the Gamma distribution had the highest overall accuracy in modelling PDFs, other distributions occasionally provided more accurate estimates at specific locations. For wind speed quantiles, particularly extreme values with an exceedance probability of 1 % (i.e., <span><math><msub><mi>s</mi><mrow><mn>1</mn><mspace></mspace><mo>%</mo></mrow></msub></math></span>), the Weibull and Gamma distributions showed superior accuracy, while the Gaussian and Lognormal distributions had larger errors. This study is expected to provide valuable insights into modeling wind speed PDFs, serving as a foundation for further developments of statistical models.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9273,"journal":{"name":"Building and Environment","volume":"279 ","pages":"Article 113034"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Statistical models incorporating mean and standard deviation to predict probability distributions of pedestrian-level wind speed in a realistic urban area\",\"authors\":\"Wei Wang,&nbsp;Yezhan Li,&nbsp;Naoki Ikegaya\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.buildenv.2025.113034\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Understanding the probabilistic characteristics of urban wind environments is crucial for pedestrian safety and comfort. Previous studies have used various distribution functions based on statistics to evaluate gusty winds; however, the prediction accuracy of gusts and plausibility of the various distribution functions have not been discussed. This paper models the probability density function (PDF) using four distribution functions: Gaussian, Lognormal, Weibull, and Gamma, with parameters determined by the method of moments based on only two statistics: mean and standard deviation. The large-eddy simulations (LES) results of a realistic urban case were used to assess their effectiveness in estimating PDFs and quantiles of wind speed. The key findings indicate that while all distributions accurately modeled the mean and standard deviation, none effectively captured skewness and kurtosis. The Gamma distribution provided the best global fit of PDFs, followed by the Weibull distribution. The Lognormal and Gaussian distributions performed less effectively, with the Gaussian distribution showing the largest errors due to its constrained, symmetric bell-shaped PDF, which struggles to capture the asymmetry in wind speed data. Although the Gamma distribution had the highest overall accuracy in modelling PDFs, other distributions occasionally provided more accurate estimates at specific locations. For wind speed quantiles, particularly extreme values with an exceedance probability of 1 % (i.e., <span><math><msub><mi>s</mi><mrow><mn>1</mn><mspace></mspace><mo>%</mo></mrow></msub></math></span>), the Weibull and Gamma distributions showed superior accuracy, while the Gaussian and Lognormal distributions had larger errors. This study is expected to provide valuable insights into modeling wind speed PDFs, serving as a foundation for further developments of statistical models.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9273,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Building and Environment\",\"volume\":\"279 \",\"pages\":\"Article 113034\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Building and Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360132325005153\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Building and Environment","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360132325005153","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

了解城市风环境的概率特征对行人的安全和舒适至关重要。以前的研究使用基于统计的各种分布函数来评估阵风;然而,阵风的预测精度和各种分布函数的合理性尚未得到讨论。本文使用高斯、对数正态、威布尔和伽马四种分布函数对概率密度函数(PDF)进行建模,参数由矩量法确定,仅基于均值和标准差两个统计量。本文利用一个实际城市的大涡模拟(LES)结果来评估其在估算pdf和风速分位数方面的有效性。主要发现表明,虽然所有分布都准确地模拟了均值和标准差,但没有一个分布有效地捕获了偏度和峰度。Gamma分布提供了最佳的pdf全局拟合,其次是Weibull分布。对数正态分布和高斯分布表现得不太有效,高斯分布由于其受约束的对称钟形PDF而显示出最大的误差,它难以捕捉风速数据的不对称性。虽然Gamma分布在pdf建模中具有最高的总体精度,但其他分布偶尔会在特定位置提供更准确的估计。对于风速分位数,特别是超过概率为1 %(即s1%)的极值,威布尔分布和伽马分布具有较好的精度,而高斯分布和对数正态分布具有较大的误差。这项研究有望为风速pdf模型的建模提供有价值的见解,为进一步发展统计模型奠定基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Statistical models incorporating mean and standard deviation to predict probability distributions of pedestrian-level wind speed in a realistic urban area
Understanding the probabilistic characteristics of urban wind environments is crucial for pedestrian safety and comfort. Previous studies have used various distribution functions based on statistics to evaluate gusty winds; however, the prediction accuracy of gusts and plausibility of the various distribution functions have not been discussed. This paper models the probability density function (PDF) using four distribution functions: Gaussian, Lognormal, Weibull, and Gamma, with parameters determined by the method of moments based on only two statistics: mean and standard deviation. The large-eddy simulations (LES) results of a realistic urban case were used to assess their effectiveness in estimating PDFs and quantiles of wind speed. The key findings indicate that while all distributions accurately modeled the mean and standard deviation, none effectively captured skewness and kurtosis. The Gamma distribution provided the best global fit of PDFs, followed by the Weibull distribution. The Lognormal and Gaussian distributions performed less effectively, with the Gaussian distribution showing the largest errors due to its constrained, symmetric bell-shaped PDF, which struggles to capture the asymmetry in wind speed data. Although the Gamma distribution had the highest overall accuracy in modelling PDFs, other distributions occasionally provided more accurate estimates at specific locations. For wind speed quantiles, particularly extreme values with an exceedance probability of 1 % (i.e., s1%), the Weibull and Gamma distributions showed superior accuracy, while the Gaussian and Lognormal distributions had larger errors. This study is expected to provide valuable insights into modeling wind speed PDFs, serving as a foundation for further developments of statistical models.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Building and Environment
Building and Environment 工程技术-工程:环境
CiteScore
12.50
自引率
23.00%
发文量
1130
审稿时长
27 days
期刊介绍: Building and Environment, an international journal, is dedicated to publishing original research papers, comprehensive review articles, editorials, and short communications in the fields of building science, urban physics, and human interaction with the indoor and outdoor built environment. The journal emphasizes innovative technologies and knowledge verified through measurement and analysis. It covers environmental performance across various spatial scales, from cities and communities to buildings and systems, fostering collaborative, multi-disciplinary research with broader significance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信