基于氧化电位和EPA的机电加工车间焊接和抛光粉尘暴露特征及健康风险评价

IF 7.1 1区 工程技术 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
Yalin Liu , Ruixin Yang , Yihua Chai , Yi Wang
{"title":"基于氧化电位和EPA的机电加工车间焊接和抛光粉尘暴露特征及健康风险评价","authors":"Yalin Liu ,&nbsp;Ruixin Yang ,&nbsp;Yihua Chai ,&nbsp;Yi Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.buildenv.2025.112971","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Welding and burnishing are standard industrial processes where workers can be highly exposed to dust for long periods. Current research on dust-related health risks primarily focuses on concentration, often overlooking the combined impact of particle size distribution and chemical composition. This study aims to reveal the relationship between the characteristics of industrial dust (concentration, particle size distribution, elemental composition) and worker health using oxidation potential and EPA health risk assessment methods while quantifying the influence of particle size and elements. We employed a breathing thermal manikin in a Huyi District, Xi'an City, machinery processing plant to simulate worker behaviour. We conducted dust sampling in the breathing zone of welding and burnishing workshops. The oxidative potential (OP) and risk assessment methods were utilized to quantify the potential individual exposure risks to workers. The mass concentration of dust in the welding workshop exhibited a significant unimodal distribution in the 4.7–7 μm particle size range, whereas the burnishing workshop showed a bimodal distribution in the 1.1–2.1 μm and 4.7–7 μm particle size ranges, with no significant seasonal variations observed. The oxidative potential of the dust displayed some similarity to the concentration distribution. Still, under the same concentration conditions, the oxidative potential of welding and burnishing dust differed significantly due to variations in elemental composition. Risk analysis revealed that manganese (Mn) and barium (Ba) had high hazard quotients, indicating non-carcinogenic risks that cannot be ignored. Additionally, despite the extremely low cobalt (Co) content, its carcinogenic risk was also found to be non-negligible.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9273,"journal":{"name":"Building and Environment","volume":"279 ","pages":"Article 112971"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Welding and burnishing dusts' exposure characteristics and health risk assessment in electromechanical processing workshop: Based on oxidation potential and EPA\",\"authors\":\"Yalin Liu ,&nbsp;Ruixin Yang ,&nbsp;Yihua Chai ,&nbsp;Yi Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.buildenv.2025.112971\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Welding and burnishing are standard industrial processes where workers can be highly exposed to dust for long periods. Current research on dust-related health risks primarily focuses on concentration, often overlooking the combined impact of particle size distribution and chemical composition. This study aims to reveal the relationship between the characteristics of industrial dust (concentration, particle size distribution, elemental composition) and worker health using oxidation potential and EPA health risk assessment methods while quantifying the influence of particle size and elements. We employed a breathing thermal manikin in a Huyi District, Xi'an City, machinery processing plant to simulate worker behaviour. We conducted dust sampling in the breathing zone of welding and burnishing workshops. The oxidative potential (OP) and risk assessment methods were utilized to quantify the potential individual exposure risks to workers. The mass concentration of dust in the welding workshop exhibited a significant unimodal distribution in the 4.7–7 μm particle size range, whereas the burnishing workshop showed a bimodal distribution in the 1.1–2.1 μm and 4.7–7 μm particle size ranges, with no significant seasonal variations observed. The oxidative potential of the dust displayed some similarity to the concentration distribution. Still, under the same concentration conditions, the oxidative potential of welding and burnishing dust differed significantly due to variations in elemental composition. Risk analysis revealed that manganese (Mn) and barium (Ba) had high hazard quotients, indicating non-carcinogenic risks that cannot be ignored. Additionally, despite the extremely low cobalt (Co) content, its carcinogenic risk was also found to be non-negligible.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9273,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Building and Environment\",\"volume\":\"279 \",\"pages\":\"Article 112971\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Building and Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360132325004524\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Building and Environment","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360132325004524","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

焊接和抛光是标准的工业过程,工人可以长时间高度暴露在灰尘中。目前对与粉尘有关的健康风险的研究主要集中在浓度上,往往忽略了粒径分布和化学成分的综合影响。本研究旨在通过氧化电位和EPA健康风险评价方法,揭示工业粉尘的浓度、粒径分布、元素组成特征与工人健康的关系,同时量化粒径和元素的影响。我们在西安市虎义区某机械加工厂采用呼吸式热人体模型模拟工人行为。我们对焊接和抛光车间的呼吸区进行了粉尘取样。利用氧化电位(OP)和风险评估方法量化工人的潜在个体暴露风险。焊接车间粉尘质量浓度在4.7 ~ 7 μm粒径范围内呈显著的单峰分布,而抛光车间粉尘质量浓度在1.1 ~ 2.1 μm和4.7 ~ 7 μm粒径范围内呈显著的双峰分布,且无显著的季节变化。粉尘的氧化电位与浓度分布有一定的相似性。然而,在相同的浓度条件下,由于元素组成的不同,焊接粉尘和抛光粉尘的氧化电位存在显著差异。风险分析显示,锰(Mn)和钡(Ba)具有较高的危害商,表明其非致癌风险不容忽视。此外,尽管钴(Co)含量极低,但其致癌风险也不容忽视。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Welding and burnishing dusts' exposure characteristics and health risk assessment in electromechanical processing workshop: Based on oxidation potential and EPA
Welding and burnishing are standard industrial processes where workers can be highly exposed to dust for long periods. Current research on dust-related health risks primarily focuses on concentration, often overlooking the combined impact of particle size distribution and chemical composition. This study aims to reveal the relationship between the characteristics of industrial dust (concentration, particle size distribution, elemental composition) and worker health using oxidation potential and EPA health risk assessment methods while quantifying the influence of particle size and elements. We employed a breathing thermal manikin in a Huyi District, Xi'an City, machinery processing plant to simulate worker behaviour. We conducted dust sampling in the breathing zone of welding and burnishing workshops. The oxidative potential (OP) and risk assessment methods were utilized to quantify the potential individual exposure risks to workers. The mass concentration of dust in the welding workshop exhibited a significant unimodal distribution in the 4.7–7 μm particle size range, whereas the burnishing workshop showed a bimodal distribution in the 1.1–2.1 μm and 4.7–7 μm particle size ranges, with no significant seasonal variations observed. The oxidative potential of the dust displayed some similarity to the concentration distribution. Still, under the same concentration conditions, the oxidative potential of welding and burnishing dust differed significantly due to variations in elemental composition. Risk analysis revealed that manganese (Mn) and barium (Ba) had high hazard quotients, indicating non-carcinogenic risks that cannot be ignored. Additionally, despite the extremely low cobalt (Co) content, its carcinogenic risk was also found to be non-negligible.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Building and Environment
Building and Environment 工程技术-工程:环境
CiteScore
12.50
自引率
23.00%
发文量
1130
审稿时长
27 days
期刊介绍: Building and Environment, an international journal, is dedicated to publishing original research papers, comprehensive review articles, editorials, and short communications in the fields of building science, urban physics, and human interaction with the indoor and outdoor built environment. The journal emphasizes innovative technologies and knowledge verified through measurement and analysis. It covers environmental performance across various spatial scales, from cities and communities to buildings and systems, fostering collaborative, multi-disciplinary research with broader significance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信