全轻质页岩陶粒混凝土与钢筋粘结性能试验研究

IF 6.7 2区 工程技术 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
Guohui Cao , Baishun Zhou , Jiyang Shen , Chao Zhou , Zaihua Zhang , Jing Liu
{"title":"全轻质页岩陶粒混凝土与钢筋粘结性能试验研究","authors":"Guohui Cao ,&nbsp;Baishun Zhou ,&nbsp;Jiyang Shen ,&nbsp;Chao Zhou ,&nbsp;Zaihua Zhang ,&nbsp;Jing Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.jobe.2025.112716","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Driven by the growing demand for lightweight materials in sustainable construction, the interfacial bonding mechanism between all-lightweight shale ceramsite concrete and rebar requires further investigation. Therefore, 57 central pullout tests were conducted to systematically evaluate the effects of concrete strength, rebar diameter, surface shapes, and yield strength on the bond behavior. The results revealed two failure modes, pullout and splitting failures, controlled by the ratio of concrete cover thickness to strength. Increased concrete strength significantly enhanced bond capacity, with ribbed rebars exhibiting 2.4 to 4.6 times higher bond strength than plain rebars, while yield strength exerted negligible influence. Rebar diameter exhibited contrasting effects, with larger diameters improving bond performance under pullout failure while smaller diameters performed better under splitting failure. The ascending branches of bond-slip curves exhibited decelerated growth rates with increased rebar diameter or concrete strength. Post-peak behavior diverged sharply with splitting failures causing abrupt stress reductions, while pullout failures exhibited gradual degradation due to concrete crushing and reduced mechanical interlock. Based on diffuse crack theory and thick-walled cylinder theory, the theoretical models for bond strength, peak slip and bond-slip relationships were developed, achieving a maximum prediction error of 16.22 % and mean squared error of 1.48 for peak slip. The proposed models demonstrated superior accuracy with 80 % experimental data alignment, outperforming existing prediction frameworks.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15064,"journal":{"name":"Journal of building engineering","volume":"107 ","pages":"Article 112716"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experimental study on the bond performance between all-light shale ceramsite concrete and rebar\",\"authors\":\"Guohui Cao ,&nbsp;Baishun Zhou ,&nbsp;Jiyang Shen ,&nbsp;Chao Zhou ,&nbsp;Zaihua Zhang ,&nbsp;Jing Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jobe.2025.112716\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Driven by the growing demand for lightweight materials in sustainable construction, the interfacial bonding mechanism between all-lightweight shale ceramsite concrete and rebar requires further investigation. Therefore, 57 central pullout tests were conducted to systematically evaluate the effects of concrete strength, rebar diameter, surface shapes, and yield strength on the bond behavior. The results revealed two failure modes, pullout and splitting failures, controlled by the ratio of concrete cover thickness to strength. Increased concrete strength significantly enhanced bond capacity, with ribbed rebars exhibiting 2.4 to 4.6 times higher bond strength than plain rebars, while yield strength exerted negligible influence. Rebar diameter exhibited contrasting effects, with larger diameters improving bond performance under pullout failure while smaller diameters performed better under splitting failure. The ascending branches of bond-slip curves exhibited decelerated growth rates with increased rebar diameter or concrete strength. Post-peak behavior diverged sharply with splitting failures causing abrupt stress reductions, while pullout failures exhibited gradual degradation due to concrete crushing and reduced mechanical interlock. Based on diffuse crack theory and thick-walled cylinder theory, the theoretical models for bond strength, peak slip and bond-slip relationships were developed, achieving a maximum prediction error of 16.22 % and mean squared error of 1.48 for peak slip. The proposed models demonstrated superior accuracy with 80 % experimental data alignment, outperforming existing prediction frameworks.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15064,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of building engineering\",\"volume\":\"107 \",\"pages\":\"Article 112716\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of building engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352710225009532\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of building engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352710225009532","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在可持续建筑对轻量化材料需求不断增长的推动下,全轻质页岩陶粒混凝土与螺纹钢之间的界面粘结机制有待进一步研究。因此,进行了57次中心拉拔试验,系统地评估了混凝土强度、钢筋直径、表面形状和屈服强度对粘结行为的影响。结果表明,受混凝土护层厚度与强度之比控制,混凝土护层有拉拔破坏和劈裂破坏两种破坏模式。混凝土强度的增加显著提高了混凝土的粘结能力,肋钢筋的粘结强度是普通钢筋的2.4 ~ 4.6倍,而屈服强度的影响可以忽略不计。螺纹钢直径表现出截然不同的效果,较大的螺纹钢直径可改善拉拔破坏时的粘结性能,而较小的螺纹钢直径可改善劈裂破坏时的粘结性能。随着钢筋直径和混凝土强度的增加,粘结-滑移曲线上升分支的增长速度减慢。峰后行为急剧分化,劈裂破坏导致应力突然降低,而拉出破坏由于混凝土破碎和机械联锁减少而逐渐退化。基于弥散裂纹理论和厚壁圆筒理论,建立了粘结强度、峰值滑移和粘结滑移关系的理论模型,峰值滑移的最大预测误差为16.22%,均方误差为1.48。所提出的模型具有80%的实验数据一致性,优于现有的预测框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Experimental study on the bond performance between all-light shale ceramsite concrete and rebar

Experimental study on the bond performance between all-light shale ceramsite concrete and rebar
Driven by the growing demand for lightweight materials in sustainable construction, the interfacial bonding mechanism between all-lightweight shale ceramsite concrete and rebar requires further investigation. Therefore, 57 central pullout tests were conducted to systematically evaluate the effects of concrete strength, rebar diameter, surface shapes, and yield strength on the bond behavior. The results revealed two failure modes, pullout and splitting failures, controlled by the ratio of concrete cover thickness to strength. Increased concrete strength significantly enhanced bond capacity, with ribbed rebars exhibiting 2.4 to 4.6 times higher bond strength than plain rebars, while yield strength exerted negligible influence. Rebar diameter exhibited contrasting effects, with larger diameters improving bond performance under pullout failure while smaller diameters performed better under splitting failure. The ascending branches of bond-slip curves exhibited decelerated growth rates with increased rebar diameter or concrete strength. Post-peak behavior diverged sharply with splitting failures causing abrupt stress reductions, while pullout failures exhibited gradual degradation due to concrete crushing and reduced mechanical interlock. Based on diffuse crack theory and thick-walled cylinder theory, the theoretical models for bond strength, peak slip and bond-slip relationships were developed, achieving a maximum prediction error of 16.22 % and mean squared error of 1.48 for peak slip. The proposed models demonstrated superior accuracy with 80 % experimental data alignment, outperforming existing prediction frameworks.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of building engineering
Journal of building engineering Engineering-Civil and Structural Engineering
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
1901
审稿时长
35 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Building Engineering is an interdisciplinary journal that covers all aspects of science and technology concerned with the whole life cycle of the built environment; from the design phase through to construction, operation, performance, maintenance and its deterioration.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信