多时段河流量预测:综合环境管理与防洪的新框架

IF 8.4 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Victor Joubier , Isa Ebtehaj , Afshin Amiri , Silvio Jose Gumiere , Hossein Bonakdari
{"title":"多时段河流量预测:综合环境管理与防洪的新框架","authors":"Victor Joubier ,&nbsp;Isa Ebtehaj ,&nbsp;Afshin Amiri ,&nbsp;Silvio Jose Gumiere ,&nbsp;Hossein Bonakdari","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.125372","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Riverine flow estimation is critical for effective water resource management and mitigation planning. Traditional machine learning and deep learning models offer various advantages, but their effectiveness in multitemporal river flow discharge estimation has yet to be fully explored. This study introduces an advanced universal group method of data handling (AUGMDH) model to predict river flow discharge across various temporal scales. The accuracy of the proposed model is compared with that of convolutional neural network (CNN) models in terms of estimating daily, mean monthly, and maximum monthly flow discharge. The AUGMDH model consistently outperforms the CNN models across all major performance metrics, such as the coefficient of determination (R<sup>2</sup>), Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE), normalized root mean square error (NRMSE), RMSE-observed standard deviation ratio (RSR), and percent bias (PBIAS), achieving an R<sup>2</sup> of 0.972 and an NSE of 0.972 for the daily flow, an R<sup>2</sup> of 0.810 and an NSE of 0.810 for the mean monthly flow, and an R<sup>2</sup> of 0.819 and an NSE of 0.818 for the maximum monthly flow. Additionally, compared to the CNN approach, the AUGMDH model yields lower AIC values across all the cases (AIC: 37,744 for daily, 2144 for mean monthly, and 2543 for maximum monthly), indicating a better balance between simplicity and accuracy. In terms of uncertainty analysis, the AUGMDH model exhibits lower uncertainty values (i.e., 2.77 for daily flow, 2.31 for mean monthly flow, and 2.46 for maximum monthly flow estimates) than the CNN models do (i.e., 2.78 for daily flow, 2.48 mean monthly flow, and 2.66 for maximum monthly flow estimates). The findings indicate that the AUGMDH model provides a more robust and reliable solution for riverine flood estimation, outperforming the CNN models across all major performance metrics, including accuracy, reliability, and computational efficiency.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":356,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Management","volume":"383 ","pages":"Article 125372"},"PeriodicalIF":8.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multitemporal river flow discharge prediction: A new framework for integrated environmental management and flood control\",\"authors\":\"Victor Joubier ,&nbsp;Isa Ebtehaj ,&nbsp;Afshin Amiri ,&nbsp;Silvio Jose Gumiere ,&nbsp;Hossein Bonakdari\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.125372\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Riverine flow estimation is critical for effective water resource management and mitigation planning. Traditional machine learning and deep learning models offer various advantages, but their effectiveness in multitemporal river flow discharge estimation has yet to be fully explored. This study introduces an advanced universal group method of data handling (AUGMDH) model to predict river flow discharge across various temporal scales. The accuracy of the proposed model is compared with that of convolutional neural network (CNN) models in terms of estimating daily, mean monthly, and maximum monthly flow discharge. The AUGMDH model consistently outperforms the CNN models across all major performance metrics, such as the coefficient of determination (R<sup>2</sup>), Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE), normalized root mean square error (NRMSE), RMSE-observed standard deviation ratio (RSR), and percent bias (PBIAS), achieving an R<sup>2</sup> of 0.972 and an NSE of 0.972 for the daily flow, an R<sup>2</sup> of 0.810 and an NSE of 0.810 for the mean monthly flow, and an R<sup>2</sup> of 0.819 and an NSE of 0.818 for the maximum monthly flow. Additionally, compared to the CNN approach, the AUGMDH model yields lower AIC values across all the cases (AIC: 37,744 for daily, 2144 for mean monthly, and 2543 for maximum monthly), indicating a better balance between simplicity and accuracy. In terms of uncertainty analysis, the AUGMDH model exhibits lower uncertainty values (i.e., 2.77 for daily flow, 2.31 for mean monthly flow, and 2.46 for maximum monthly flow estimates) than the CNN models do (i.e., 2.78 for daily flow, 2.48 mean monthly flow, and 2.66 for maximum monthly flow estimates). The findings indicate that the AUGMDH model provides a more robust and reliable solution for riverine flood estimation, outperforming the CNN models across all major performance metrics, including accuracy, reliability, and computational efficiency.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":356,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Environmental Management\",\"volume\":\"383 \",\"pages\":\"Article 125372\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Environmental Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301479725013489\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301479725013489","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

河流流量估算对于有效的水资源管理和缓解规划至关重要。传统的机器学习和深度学习模型虽然具有各种优势,但其在多时段河流流量估算中的有效性尚未得到充分的探索。本文介绍了一种先进的通用组数据处理方法(AUGMDH)模型,用于预测不同时间尺度的河流流量。在估计日流量、月平均流量和月最大流量方面,将该模型与卷积神经网络(CNN)模型的精度进行了比较。AUGMDH模型始终优于CNN模型在所有主要的性能指标,如确定系数(R2), Nash-Sutcliffe效率(研究),归一化均方根误差(NRMSE) RMSE-observed标准差比率(RSR)和百分比偏差(PBIAS),实现了R2为0.972和0.972的了无每日流,R2为0.810和0.810的了无月平均流,和一个R2为0.819和0.818的了无最大月度流动。此外,与CNN方法相比,AUGMDH模型在所有情况下产生更低的AIC值(AIC:每日37,744,月平均值2144,月最大值2543),表明在简单性和准确性之间取得了更好的平衡。在不确定性分析方面,AUGMDH模型的不确定性值(日流量为2.77,月平均流量为2.31,月最大流量估计为2.46)低于CNN模型(日流量为2.78,月平均流量为2.48,月最大流量估计为2.66)。研究结果表明,AUGMDH模型为河流洪水估计提供了更强大、更可靠的解决方案,在所有主要性能指标上都优于CNN模型,包括准确性、可靠性和计算效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Multitemporal river flow discharge prediction: A new framework for integrated environmental management and flood control

Multitemporal river flow discharge prediction: A new framework for integrated environmental management and flood control
Riverine flow estimation is critical for effective water resource management and mitigation planning. Traditional machine learning and deep learning models offer various advantages, but their effectiveness in multitemporal river flow discharge estimation has yet to be fully explored. This study introduces an advanced universal group method of data handling (AUGMDH) model to predict river flow discharge across various temporal scales. The accuracy of the proposed model is compared with that of convolutional neural network (CNN) models in terms of estimating daily, mean monthly, and maximum monthly flow discharge. The AUGMDH model consistently outperforms the CNN models across all major performance metrics, such as the coefficient of determination (R2), Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE), normalized root mean square error (NRMSE), RMSE-observed standard deviation ratio (RSR), and percent bias (PBIAS), achieving an R2 of 0.972 and an NSE of 0.972 for the daily flow, an R2 of 0.810 and an NSE of 0.810 for the mean monthly flow, and an R2 of 0.819 and an NSE of 0.818 for the maximum monthly flow. Additionally, compared to the CNN approach, the AUGMDH model yields lower AIC values across all the cases (AIC: 37,744 for daily, 2144 for mean monthly, and 2543 for maximum monthly), indicating a better balance between simplicity and accuracy. In terms of uncertainty analysis, the AUGMDH model exhibits lower uncertainty values (i.e., 2.77 for daily flow, 2.31 for mean monthly flow, and 2.46 for maximum monthly flow estimates) than the CNN models do (i.e., 2.78 for daily flow, 2.48 mean monthly flow, and 2.66 for maximum monthly flow estimates). The findings indicate that the AUGMDH model provides a more robust and reliable solution for riverine flood estimation, outperforming the CNN models across all major performance metrics, including accuracy, reliability, and computational efficiency.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Environmental Management
Journal of Environmental Management 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
5.70%
发文量
2477
审稿时长
84 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Environmental Management is a journal for the publication of peer reviewed, original research for all aspects of management and the managed use of the environment, both natural and man-made.Critical review articles are also welcome; submission of these is strongly encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信