Examining the role and neural electrophysiological mechanisms of adjective cues in size judgment

Numerous influential theories have attempted to elucidate the relationship between language and thought. The debate persists on whether language and thought are distinct entities or if language is deeply embedded in individual cognitive processes. This study employs adjective cues combined with a mental imagery size judgment task as an experimental paradigm, utilizing neurophysiological techniques to preliminarily explore the role of adjectives in size judgment tasks and their underlying neurophysiological mechanisms. Findings reveal that performance is best when adjectives are congruent with the size of the object, with EEG microstate results indicating strong activity in Class A, related to language networks under this condition. Additionally, when adjectives conflict with object size, the discovery of the Ni component suggests that individuals monitor and inhibit the conflict between adjectives and object size, leading to decreased task performance in this condition. Moreover, when object size is ambiguous, individuals' size judgments do not benefit significantly from clear adjective cues. Event-related potentials and EEG microstate results suggest that under this condition, top-down cognitive resources are recruited more extensively. In conclusion, language plays a more crucial role in simpler judgment tasks; as tasks become more complex, judgment processes engage a greater number of distributed brain regions to collaborate, while the language system remains active. This study provides initial cognitive neuroscience evidence for understanding the relationship between language and simple forms of thought, offering preliminary insights for future investigations into the connection between language and thought.