Wenpei Miao , Guoliang Li , Fenglin Niu , Kai Tao , Yonghua Li
{"title":"青藏高原东南部横波速度模式的全波模拟评价","authors":"Wenpei Miao , Guoliang Li , Fenglin Niu , Kai Tao , Yonghua Li","doi":"10.1016/j.eqs.2025.01.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Various velocity models have been built for Southeast Qinghai-Xizang Plateau with the purpose of revealing the internal dynamics and estimating local seismic hazards. In this study, we use a 3-D full-waveform modeling package to systematically validate three published continental-scale velocity models, that is, Shen2016, FWEA18, and USTClitho1.0, leveraging the ample datasets in Southeast Qinghai-Xizang Plateau region. Travel time residuals and waveform similarities are measured between observed empirical Green’s functions and synthetic waveforms. The results show that the Shen2016 model, derived from traditional surface wave tomography, performs best in fitting Rayleigh waves in the Southeast Qinghai-Xizang Plateau, followed by FWEA18, built from full-waveform inversion of long-period body and surface waves. The USTClitho1.0 model, although inverted from body wave datasets, is comparable with FWEA18 in fitting Rayleigh waves. The results also show that all the models are faster than the ground-truth model and show relatively large travel-time residuals and poor waveform similarities at shorter period bands, possibly caused by small-scale structural heterogeneities in the shallower crust. We further invert the time residuals for spatial velocity residuals and reveal that all three models underestimate the amplitudes of high- and low-velocity anomalies. The underestimated amplitude is up to 4%, which is non-negligible considering that the overall amplitude of anomalies is only 5%−10% in the crust. These results suggest that datasets and the inversion method are both essential to building accurate models and further refinements of these models are necessary.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46333,"journal":{"name":"Earthquake Science","volume":"38 3","pages":"Pages 159-171"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of shear wave velocity models in the Southeast Qinghai-Xizang Plateau with full-wave simulation\",\"authors\":\"Wenpei Miao , Guoliang Li , Fenglin Niu , Kai Tao , Yonghua Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eqs.2025.01.007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Various velocity models have been built for Southeast Qinghai-Xizang Plateau with the purpose of revealing the internal dynamics and estimating local seismic hazards. In this study, we use a 3-D full-waveform modeling package to systematically validate three published continental-scale velocity models, that is, Shen2016, FWEA18, and USTClitho1.0, leveraging the ample datasets in Southeast Qinghai-Xizang Plateau region. Travel time residuals and waveform similarities are measured between observed empirical Green’s functions and synthetic waveforms. The results show that the Shen2016 model, derived from traditional surface wave tomography, performs best in fitting Rayleigh waves in the Southeast Qinghai-Xizang Plateau, followed by FWEA18, built from full-waveform inversion of long-period body and surface waves. The USTClitho1.0 model, although inverted from body wave datasets, is comparable with FWEA18 in fitting Rayleigh waves. The results also show that all the models are faster than the ground-truth model and show relatively large travel-time residuals and poor waveform similarities at shorter period bands, possibly caused by small-scale structural heterogeneities in the shallower crust. We further invert the time residuals for spatial velocity residuals and reveal that all three models underestimate the amplitudes of high- and low-velocity anomalies. The underestimated amplitude is up to 4%, which is non-negligible considering that the overall amplitude of anomalies is only 5%−10% in the crust. These results suggest that datasets and the inversion method are both essential to building accurate models and further refinements of these models are necessary.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46333,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Earthquake Science\",\"volume\":\"38 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 159-171\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Earthquake Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674451925000072\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Earth and Planetary Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earthquake Science","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674451925000072","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
Assessment of shear wave velocity models in the Southeast Qinghai-Xizang Plateau with full-wave simulation
Various velocity models have been built for Southeast Qinghai-Xizang Plateau with the purpose of revealing the internal dynamics and estimating local seismic hazards. In this study, we use a 3-D full-waveform modeling package to systematically validate three published continental-scale velocity models, that is, Shen2016, FWEA18, and USTClitho1.0, leveraging the ample datasets in Southeast Qinghai-Xizang Plateau region. Travel time residuals and waveform similarities are measured between observed empirical Green’s functions and synthetic waveforms. The results show that the Shen2016 model, derived from traditional surface wave tomography, performs best in fitting Rayleigh waves in the Southeast Qinghai-Xizang Plateau, followed by FWEA18, built from full-waveform inversion of long-period body and surface waves. The USTClitho1.0 model, although inverted from body wave datasets, is comparable with FWEA18 in fitting Rayleigh waves. The results also show that all the models are faster than the ground-truth model and show relatively large travel-time residuals and poor waveform similarities at shorter period bands, possibly caused by small-scale structural heterogeneities in the shallower crust. We further invert the time residuals for spatial velocity residuals and reveal that all three models underestimate the amplitudes of high- and low-velocity anomalies. The underestimated amplitude is up to 4%, which is non-negligible considering that the overall amplitude of anomalies is only 5%−10% in the crust. These results suggest that datasets and the inversion method are both essential to building accurate models and further refinements of these models are necessary.
期刊介绍:
Earthquake Science (EQS) aims to publish high-quality, original, peer-reviewed articles on earthquake-related research subjects. It is an English international journal sponsored by the Seismological Society of China and the Institute of Geophysics, China Earthquake Administration.
The topics include, but not limited to, the following
● Seismic sources of all kinds.
● Earth structure at all scales.
● Seismotectonics.
● New methods and theoretical seismology.
● Strong ground motion.
● Seismic phenomena of all kinds.
● Seismic hazards, earthquake forecasting and prediction.
● Seismic instrumentation.
● Significant recent or past seismic events.
● Documentation of recent seismic events or important observations.
● Descriptions of field deployments, new methods, and available software tools.
The types of manuscripts include the following. There is no length requirement, except for the Short Notes.
【Articles】 Original contributions that have not been published elsewhere.
【Short Notes】 Short papers of recent events or topics that warrant rapid peer reviews and publications. Limited to 4 publication pages.
【Rapid Communications】 Significant contributions that warrant rapid peer reviews and publications.
【Review Articles】Review articles are by invitation only. Please contact the editorial office and editors for possible proposals.
【Toolboxes】 Descriptions of novel numerical methods and associated computer codes.
【Data Products】 Documentation of datasets of various kinds that are interested to the community and available for open access (field data, processed data, synthetic data, or models).
【Opinions】Views on important topics and future directions in earthquake science.
【Comments and Replies】Commentaries on a recently published EQS paper is welcome. The authors of the paper commented will be invited to reply. Both the Comment and the Reply are subject to peer review.