青藏高原东南部横波速度模式的全波模拟评价

IF 1.2 4区 地球科学 Q3 Earth and Planetary Sciences
Wenpei Miao , Guoliang Li , Fenglin Niu , Kai Tao , Yonghua Li
{"title":"青藏高原东南部横波速度模式的全波模拟评价","authors":"Wenpei Miao ,&nbsp;Guoliang Li ,&nbsp;Fenglin Niu ,&nbsp;Kai Tao ,&nbsp;Yonghua Li","doi":"10.1016/j.eqs.2025.01.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Various velocity models have been built for Southeast Qinghai-Xizang Plateau with the purpose of revealing the internal dynamics and estimating local seismic hazards. In this study, we use a 3-D full-waveform modeling package to systematically validate three published continental-scale velocity models, that is, Shen2016, FWEA18, and USTClitho1.0, leveraging the ample datasets in Southeast Qinghai-Xizang Plateau region. Travel time residuals and waveform similarities are measured between observed empirical Green’s functions and synthetic waveforms. The results show that the Shen2016 model, derived from traditional surface wave tomography, performs best in fitting Rayleigh waves in the Southeast Qinghai-Xizang Plateau, followed by FWEA18, built from full-waveform inversion of long-period body and surface waves. The USTClitho1.0 model, although inverted from body wave datasets, is comparable with FWEA18 in fitting Rayleigh waves. The results also show that all the models are faster than the ground-truth model and show relatively large travel-time residuals and poor waveform similarities at shorter period bands, possibly caused by small-scale structural heterogeneities in the shallower crust. We further invert the time residuals for spatial velocity residuals and reveal that all three models underestimate the amplitudes of high- and low-velocity anomalies. The underestimated amplitude is up to 4%, which is non-negligible considering that the overall amplitude of anomalies is only 5%−10% in the crust. These results suggest that datasets and the inversion method are both essential to building accurate models and further refinements of these models are necessary.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46333,"journal":{"name":"Earthquake Science","volume":"38 3","pages":"Pages 159-171"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of shear wave velocity models in the Southeast Qinghai-Xizang Plateau with full-wave simulation\",\"authors\":\"Wenpei Miao ,&nbsp;Guoliang Li ,&nbsp;Fenglin Niu ,&nbsp;Kai Tao ,&nbsp;Yonghua Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eqs.2025.01.007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Various velocity models have been built for Southeast Qinghai-Xizang Plateau with the purpose of revealing the internal dynamics and estimating local seismic hazards. In this study, we use a 3-D full-waveform modeling package to systematically validate three published continental-scale velocity models, that is, Shen2016, FWEA18, and USTClitho1.0, leveraging the ample datasets in Southeast Qinghai-Xizang Plateau region. Travel time residuals and waveform similarities are measured between observed empirical Green’s functions and synthetic waveforms. The results show that the Shen2016 model, derived from traditional surface wave tomography, performs best in fitting Rayleigh waves in the Southeast Qinghai-Xizang Plateau, followed by FWEA18, built from full-waveform inversion of long-period body and surface waves. The USTClitho1.0 model, although inverted from body wave datasets, is comparable with FWEA18 in fitting Rayleigh waves. The results also show that all the models are faster than the ground-truth model and show relatively large travel-time residuals and poor waveform similarities at shorter period bands, possibly caused by small-scale structural heterogeneities in the shallower crust. We further invert the time residuals for spatial velocity residuals and reveal that all three models underestimate the amplitudes of high- and low-velocity anomalies. The underestimated amplitude is up to 4%, which is non-negligible considering that the overall amplitude of anomalies is only 5%−10% in the crust. These results suggest that datasets and the inversion method are both essential to building accurate models and further refinements of these models are necessary.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46333,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Earthquake Science\",\"volume\":\"38 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 159-171\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Earthquake Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674451925000072\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Earth and Planetary Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earthquake Science","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674451925000072","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在青藏高原东南部建立了各种速度模型,以揭示其内部动力学和估计局部地震危险性。本文利用青藏高原东南地区的样例数据集,利用三维全波形建模软件包对Shen2016、FWEA18和USTClitho1.0三个大陆尺度速度模型进行了系统验证。测量了观测到的经验格林函数和合成波形之间的走时残差和波形相似度。结果表明,基于传统面波层析成像的Shen2016模型对青藏高原东南部瑞利波的拟合效果最好,其次是基于长周期体波和面波全波形反演的FWEA18模型。USTClitho1.0模型虽然是从体波数据集反演的,但在拟合瑞利波方面与FWEA18相当。结果还表明,所有模型都比地基真值模型快,并且在较短周期波段显示出较大的走时残差和较差的波形相似性,这可能是由于地壳浅层的小尺度结构非均质性造成的。我们进一步将时间残差反演为空间速度残差,并发现所有三种模型都低估了高速和低速异常的振幅。低估幅度高达4%,考虑到地壳整体异常幅度仅为5% ~ 10%,这是不可忽略的。这些结果表明,数据集和反演方法对于建立准确的模型都是必不可少的,并且需要对这些模型进行进一步的改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessment of shear wave velocity models in the Southeast Qinghai-Xizang Plateau with full-wave simulation
Various velocity models have been built for Southeast Qinghai-Xizang Plateau with the purpose of revealing the internal dynamics and estimating local seismic hazards. In this study, we use a 3-D full-waveform modeling package to systematically validate three published continental-scale velocity models, that is, Shen2016, FWEA18, and USTClitho1.0, leveraging the ample datasets in Southeast Qinghai-Xizang Plateau region. Travel time residuals and waveform similarities are measured between observed empirical Green’s functions and synthetic waveforms. The results show that the Shen2016 model, derived from traditional surface wave tomography, performs best in fitting Rayleigh waves in the Southeast Qinghai-Xizang Plateau, followed by FWEA18, built from full-waveform inversion of long-period body and surface waves. The USTClitho1.0 model, although inverted from body wave datasets, is comparable with FWEA18 in fitting Rayleigh waves. The results also show that all the models are faster than the ground-truth model and show relatively large travel-time residuals and poor waveform similarities at shorter period bands, possibly caused by small-scale structural heterogeneities in the shallower crust. We further invert the time residuals for spatial velocity residuals and reveal that all three models underestimate the amplitudes of high- and low-velocity anomalies. The underestimated amplitude is up to 4%, which is non-negligible considering that the overall amplitude of anomalies is only 5%−10% in the crust. These results suggest that datasets and the inversion method are both essential to building accurate models and further refinements of these models are necessary.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Earthquake Science
Earthquake Science GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
42
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Earthquake Science (EQS) aims to publish high-quality, original, peer-reviewed articles on earthquake-related research subjects. It is an English international journal sponsored by the Seismological Society of China and the Institute of Geophysics, China Earthquake Administration. The topics include, but not limited to, the following ● Seismic sources of all kinds. ● Earth structure at all scales. ● Seismotectonics. ● New methods and theoretical seismology. ● Strong ground motion. ● Seismic phenomena of all kinds. ● Seismic hazards, earthquake forecasting and prediction. ● Seismic instrumentation. ● Significant recent or past seismic events. ● Documentation of recent seismic events or important observations. ● Descriptions of field deployments, new methods, and available software tools. The types of manuscripts include the following. There is no length requirement, except for the Short Notes. 【Articles】 Original contributions that have not been published elsewhere. 【Short Notes】 Short papers of recent events or topics that warrant rapid peer reviews and publications. Limited to 4 publication pages. 【Rapid Communications】 Significant contributions that warrant rapid peer reviews and publications. 【Review Articles】Review articles are by invitation only. Please contact the editorial office and editors for possible proposals. 【Toolboxes】 Descriptions of novel numerical methods and associated computer codes. 【Data Products】 Documentation of datasets of various kinds that are interested to the community and available for open access (field data, processed data, synthetic data, or models). 【Opinions】Views on important topics and future directions in earthquake science. 【Comments and Replies】Commentaries on a recently published EQS paper is welcome. The authors of the paper commented will be invited to reply. Both the Comment and the Reply are subject to peer review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信