A. Matta , E. Polychronopoulou , Y.-F. Kuo , G. Sharma , A.G. Duarte
{"title":"慢性呼吸系统疾病患者肺康复利用:2014-2019","authors":"A. Matta , E. Polychronopoulou , Y.-F. Kuo , G. Sharma , A.G. Duarte","doi":"10.1016/j.rmed.2025.108110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Chronic respiratory diseases are associated with significant disability and death. Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is recommended in the management of chronic respiratory diseases. There is limited population level data comparing PR utilization and completion among patients with chronic respiratory diseases.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective, cross sectional analysis concerning PR use in adults residing in the U.S. with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), interstitial lung disease (ILD), idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), pulmonary hypertension, and bronchiectasis was conducted using the Merative™ MarketScan® Research Databases. PR use was identified using current procedural terminology (CPT) and healthcare common procedure coding system (HCPCS) codes. Demographics, comorbidities, oxygen use, medications, initiation and participation of PR by disease state were collected. Analysis involved chi-square tests and generalized estimating equations.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>From 2014 to 2019, we identified 892,741 adults with chronic respiratory diseases and COPD was the most prevalent. PR initiation occurred in 2.3 % and annual participation ranged from 1.5 % to 1.7 %. The IPF group had the largest proportion of patients that initiated PR compared to other groups. Completion of ≥8 sessions was greatest for the group with IPF (60.8 %), followed by non IPF ILD (56.2 %), bronchiectasis (55.3 %), pulmonary hypertension (55.1 %) and COPD (53.9 %). Completion of ≥8 sessions was significantly greater for the IPF group compared to the COPD group, (p < 0.0001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>PR was underutilized among individuals with chronic respiratory disease, however the group with IPF demonstrated the greatest proportion of PR initiation and completion compared with other groups.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21057,"journal":{"name":"Respiratory medicine","volume":"242 ","pages":"Article 108110"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pulmonary rehabilitation utilization in patients with chronic respiratory diseases: 2014–2019\",\"authors\":\"A. Matta , E. Polychronopoulou , Y.-F. Kuo , G. Sharma , A.G. Duarte\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rmed.2025.108110\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Chronic respiratory diseases are associated with significant disability and death. Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is recommended in the management of chronic respiratory diseases. There is limited population level data comparing PR utilization and completion among patients with chronic respiratory diseases.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective, cross sectional analysis concerning PR use in adults residing in the U.S. with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), interstitial lung disease (ILD), idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), pulmonary hypertension, and bronchiectasis was conducted using the Merative™ MarketScan® Research Databases. PR use was identified using current procedural terminology (CPT) and healthcare common procedure coding system (HCPCS) codes. Demographics, comorbidities, oxygen use, medications, initiation and participation of PR by disease state were collected. Analysis involved chi-square tests and generalized estimating equations.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>From 2014 to 2019, we identified 892,741 adults with chronic respiratory diseases and COPD was the most prevalent. PR initiation occurred in 2.3 % and annual participation ranged from 1.5 % to 1.7 %. The IPF group had the largest proportion of patients that initiated PR compared to other groups. Completion of ≥8 sessions was greatest for the group with IPF (60.8 %), followed by non IPF ILD (56.2 %), bronchiectasis (55.3 %), pulmonary hypertension (55.1 %) and COPD (53.9 %). Completion of ≥8 sessions was significantly greater for the IPF group compared to the COPD group, (p < 0.0001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>PR was underutilized among individuals with chronic respiratory disease, however the group with IPF demonstrated the greatest proportion of PR initiation and completion compared with other groups.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21057,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Respiratory medicine\",\"volume\":\"242 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108110\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Respiratory medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0954611125001726\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0954611125001726","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Pulmonary rehabilitation utilization in patients with chronic respiratory diseases: 2014–2019
Background
Chronic respiratory diseases are associated with significant disability and death. Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is recommended in the management of chronic respiratory diseases. There is limited population level data comparing PR utilization and completion among patients with chronic respiratory diseases.
Methods
A retrospective, cross sectional analysis concerning PR use in adults residing in the U.S. with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), interstitial lung disease (ILD), idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), pulmonary hypertension, and bronchiectasis was conducted using the Merative™ MarketScan® Research Databases. PR use was identified using current procedural terminology (CPT) and healthcare common procedure coding system (HCPCS) codes. Demographics, comorbidities, oxygen use, medications, initiation and participation of PR by disease state were collected. Analysis involved chi-square tests and generalized estimating equations.
Results
From 2014 to 2019, we identified 892,741 adults with chronic respiratory diseases and COPD was the most prevalent. PR initiation occurred in 2.3 % and annual participation ranged from 1.5 % to 1.7 %. The IPF group had the largest proportion of patients that initiated PR compared to other groups. Completion of ≥8 sessions was greatest for the group with IPF (60.8 %), followed by non IPF ILD (56.2 %), bronchiectasis (55.3 %), pulmonary hypertension (55.1 %) and COPD (53.9 %). Completion of ≥8 sessions was significantly greater for the IPF group compared to the COPD group, (p < 0.0001).
Conclusion
PR was underutilized among individuals with chronic respiratory disease, however the group with IPF demonstrated the greatest proportion of PR initiation and completion compared with other groups.
期刊介绍:
Respiratory Medicine is an internationally-renowned journal devoted to the rapid publication of clinically-relevant respiratory medicine research. It combines cutting-edge original research with state-of-the-art reviews dealing with all aspects of respiratory diseases and therapeutic interventions. Topics include adult and paediatric medicine, epidemiology, immunology and cell biology, physiology, occupational disorders, and the role of allergens and pollutants.
Respiratory Medicine is increasingly the journal of choice for publication of phased trial work, commenting on effectiveness, dosage and methods of action.