{"title":"粗糙表面特性及其接触行为的数值分析:PSD Vs WM函数生成自仿射分形表面","authors":"Kai Jiang , Zhifeng Liu , Tao Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.triboint.2025.110741","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As is well known, rough surfaces exhibit self-affine fractal. Synthesized artificial fractal surfaces with the power spectral density (PSD) and Weierstrass-Mandelbrot (WM) function methods are employed to facilitate contact research on friction, wear and lubrication. Since these two methods are independent, it is challenging to control the input parameters and ensure the creation of identical artificial surfaces with same roughness parameters. Nevertheless, comparisons between them are necessary for engineering research. In this paper, based on Nayak’s random process theory, a power spectral density that incorporates the WM function is established. The mathematical expression for the fractal roughness <span><math><mi>G</mi></math></span> including <span><math><mi>H</mi></math></span>, <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>q</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>l</mi></mrow></msub></math></span>, <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>q</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>s</mi></mrow></msub></math></span>, <span><math><mi>ζ</mi></math></span>, <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>h</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>rms</mi></mrow></msub></math></span> and <span><math><mi>M</mi></math></span> is then derived, using the definition of the root mean square roughness as a reference, to match the WM and PSD surfaces. Through extensive numerical simulations, the asperity overlap is quantified for the first time, with <span><math><mrow><mi>M</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>5</mn></mrow></math></span> specified, solving the problem of the WM function's inability to accurately represent rough surfaces. Additionally, we compare the multiasperity contact models with the Persson model. When the input parameters are the constant, rough surface characteristics and their contact behavior of the two surface types are nearly identical, so far both methods can be used for accurate simulation of fractal surfaces.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23238,"journal":{"name":"Tribology International","volume":"209 ","pages":"Article 110741"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Numerical analysis of rough surface characteristics and their contact behavior: The PSD Vs WM function generated self-affine fractal surfaces\",\"authors\":\"Kai Jiang , Zhifeng Liu , Tao Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.triboint.2025.110741\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>As is well known, rough surfaces exhibit self-affine fractal. Synthesized artificial fractal surfaces with the power spectral density (PSD) and Weierstrass-Mandelbrot (WM) function methods are employed to facilitate contact research on friction, wear and lubrication. Since these two methods are independent, it is challenging to control the input parameters and ensure the creation of identical artificial surfaces with same roughness parameters. Nevertheless, comparisons between them are necessary for engineering research. In this paper, based on Nayak’s random process theory, a power spectral density that incorporates the WM function is established. The mathematical expression for the fractal roughness <span><math><mi>G</mi></math></span> including <span><math><mi>H</mi></math></span>, <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>q</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>l</mi></mrow></msub></math></span>, <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>q</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>s</mi></mrow></msub></math></span>, <span><math><mi>ζ</mi></math></span>, <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>h</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>rms</mi></mrow></msub></math></span> and <span><math><mi>M</mi></math></span> is then derived, using the definition of the root mean square roughness as a reference, to match the WM and PSD surfaces. Through extensive numerical simulations, the asperity overlap is quantified for the first time, with <span><math><mrow><mi>M</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>5</mn></mrow></math></span> specified, solving the problem of the WM function's inability to accurately represent rough surfaces. Additionally, we compare the multiasperity contact models with the Persson model. When the input parameters are the constant, rough surface characteristics and their contact behavior of the two surface types are nearly identical, so far both methods can be used for accurate simulation of fractal surfaces.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23238,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tribology International\",\"volume\":\"209 \",\"pages\":\"Article 110741\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tribology International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301679X25002361\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tribology International","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301679X25002361","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Numerical analysis of rough surface characteristics and their contact behavior: The PSD Vs WM function generated self-affine fractal surfaces
As is well known, rough surfaces exhibit self-affine fractal. Synthesized artificial fractal surfaces with the power spectral density (PSD) and Weierstrass-Mandelbrot (WM) function methods are employed to facilitate contact research on friction, wear and lubrication. Since these two methods are independent, it is challenging to control the input parameters and ensure the creation of identical artificial surfaces with same roughness parameters. Nevertheless, comparisons between them are necessary for engineering research. In this paper, based on Nayak’s random process theory, a power spectral density that incorporates the WM function is established. The mathematical expression for the fractal roughness including , , , , and is then derived, using the definition of the root mean square roughness as a reference, to match the WM and PSD surfaces. Through extensive numerical simulations, the asperity overlap is quantified for the first time, with specified, solving the problem of the WM function's inability to accurately represent rough surfaces. Additionally, we compare the multiasperity contact models with the Persson model. When the input parameters are the constant, rough surface characteristics and their contact behavior of the two surface types are nearly identical, so far both methods can be used for accurate simulation of fractal surfaces.
期刊介绍:
Tribology is the science of rubbing surfaces and contributes to every facet of our everyday life, from live cell friction to engine lubrication and seismology. As such tribology is truly multidisciplinary and this extraordinary breadth of scientific interest is reflected in the scope of Tribology International.
Tribology International seeks to publish original research papers of the highest scientific quality to provide an archival resource for scientists from all backgrounds. Written contributions are invited reporting experimental and modelling studies both in established areas of tribology and emerging fields. Scientific topics include the physics or chemistry of tribo-surfaces, bio-tribology, surface engineering and materials, contact mechanics, nano-tribology, lubricants and hydrodynamic lubrication.