{"title":"通过原木出口禁令促进就业:来自发展中国家木材加工企业的见解","authors":"Sébastien Marchand , Mouhamed Zerbo","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2025.103491","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study assesses the impact of the adoption of the log export ban (LEB) on the employment of 1739 wood processing firms surveyed between 2006 and 2018 and located in 74 developing countries. Using the entropy balancing approach, our results suggest that LEB policy adoption significantly increases total employment in firms located in adopter countries compared to those in non-adopter countries. In addition, we examine the heterogeneous effects of LEB policy on various categories of employment. Our findings indicate that the implementation of LEB significantly increases production employment, permanent employment, and unskilled labor, while it does not exhibit a statistically significant impact on non-production employment, temporary employment, and skilled labor. All of these results are robust to the use of an alternative impact analysis method, that is, the instrumental variables (IV) approach. All of these results can be attributed to the specific context of the wood processing industries in developing countries, characterized by labor-intensive operations and a predominant focus on low-complexity wood processing. The evidence suggests that the implementation of LEB policy should be complemented by additional industrial and employment policies. Such policies could, for example, facilitate the attraction of foreign direct investment (FDI), promote technology transfers, and foster the development of highly specialized training programs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12451,"journal":{"name":"Forest Policy and Economics","volume":"174 ","pages":"Article 103491"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhancing employment through log export ban: Insights from wood-processing firms in developing countries\",\"authors\":\"Sébastien Marchand , Mouhamed Zerbo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.forpol.2025.103491\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study assesses the impact of the adoption of the log export ban (LEB) on the employment of 1739 wood processing firms surveyed between 2006 and 2018 and located in 74 developing countries. Using the entropy balancing approach, our results suggest that LEB policy adoption significantly increases total employment in firms located in adopter countries compared to those in non-adopter countries. In addition, we examine the heterogeneous effects of LEB policy on various categories of employment. Our findings indicate that the implementation of LEB significantly increases production employment, permanent employment, and unskilled labor, while it does not exhibit a statistically significant impact on non-production employment, temporary employment, and skilled labor. All of these results are robust to the use of an alternative impact analysis method, that is, the instrumental variables (IV) approach. All of these results can be attributed to the specific context of the wood processing industries in developing countries, characterized by labor-intensive operations and a predominant focus on low-complexity wood processing. The evidence suggests that the implementation of LEB policy should be complemented by additional industrial and employment policies. Such policies could, for example, facilitate the attraction of foreign direct investment (FDI), promote technology transfers, and foster the development of highly specialized training programs.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12451,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Forest Policy and Economics\",\"volume\":\"174 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103491\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Forest Policy and Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S138993412500070X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forest Policy and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S138993412500070X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Enhancing employment through log export ban: Insights from wood-processing firms in developing countries
This study assesses the impact of the adoption of the log export ban (LEB) on the employment of 1739 wood processing firms surveyed between 2006 and 2018 and located in 74 developing countries. Using the entropy balancing approach, our results suggest that LEB policy adoption significantly increases total employment in firms located in adopter countries compared to those in non-adopter countries. In addition, we examine the heterogeneous effects of LEB policy on various categories of employment. Our findings indicate that the implementation of LEB significantly increases production employment, permanent employment, and unskilled labor, while it does not exhibit a statistically significant impact on non-production employment, temporary employment, and skilled labor. All of these results are robust to the use of an alternative impact analysis method, that is, the instrumental variables (IV) approach. All of these results can be attributed to the specific context of the wood processing industries in developing countries, characterized by labor-intensive operations and a predominant focus on low-complexity wood processing. The evidence suggests that the implementation of LEB policy should be complemented by additional industrial and employment policies. Such policies could, for example, facilitate the attraction of foreign direct investment (FDI), promote technology transfers, and foster the development of highly specialized training programs.
期刊介绍:
Forest Policy and Economics is a leading scientific journal that publishes peer-reviewed policy and economics research relating to forests, forested landscapes, forest-related industries, and other forest-relevant land uses. It also welcomes contributions from other social sciences and humanities perspectives that make clear theoretical, conceptual and methodological contributions to the existing state-of-the-art literature on forests and related land use systems. These disciplines include, but are not limited to, sociology, anthropology, human geography, history, jurisprudence, planning, development studies, and psychology research on forests. Forest Policy and Economics is global in scope and publishes multiple article types of high scientific standard. Acceptance for publication is subject to a double-blind peer-review process.