通过原木出口禁令促进就业:来自发展中国家木材加工企业的见解

IF 4 2区 农林科学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Sébastien Marchand , Mouhamed Zerbo
{"title":"通过原木出口禁令促进就业:来自发展中国家木材加工企业的见解","authors":"Sébastien Marchand ,&nbsp;Mouhamed Zerbo","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2025.103491","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study assesses the impact of the adoption of the log export ban (LEB) on the employment of 1739 wood processing firms surveyed between 2006 and 2018 and located in 74 developing countries. Using the entropy balancing approach, our results suggest that LEB policy adoption significantly increases total employment in firms located in adopter countries compared to those in non-adopter countries. In addition, we examine the heterogeneous effects of LEB policy on various categories of employment. Our findings indicate that the implementation of LEB significantly increases production employment, permanent employment, and unskilled labor, while it does not exhibit a statistically significant impact on non-production employment, temporary employment, and skilled labor. All of these results are robust to the use of an alternative impact analysis method, that is, the instrumental variables (IV) approach. All of these results can be attributed to the specific context of the wood processing industries in developing countries, characterized by labor-intensive operations and a predominant focus on low-complexity wood processing. The evidence suggests that the implementation of LEB policy should be complemented by additional industrial and employment policies. Such policies could, for example, facilitate the attraction of foreign direct investment (FDI), promote technology transfers, and foster the development of highly specialized training programs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12451,"journal":{"name":"Forest Policy and Economics","volume":"174 ","pages":"Article 103491"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhancing employment through log export ban: Insights from wood-processing firms in developing countries\",\"authors\":\"Sébastien Marchand ,&nbsp;Mouhamed Zerbo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.forpol.2025.103491\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study assesses the impact of the adoption of the log export ban (LEB) on the employment of 1739 wood processing firms surveyed between 2006 and 2018 and located in 74 developing countries. Using the entropy balancing approach, our results suggest that LEB policy adoption significantly increases total employment in firms located in adopter countries compared to those in non-adopter countries. In addition, we examine the heterogeneous effects of LEB policy on various categories of employment. Our findings indicate that the implementation of LEB significantly increases production employment, permanent employment, and unskilled labor, while it does not exhibit a statistically significant impact on non-production employment, temporary employment, and skilled labor. All of these results are robust to the use of an alternative impact analysis method, that is, the instrumental variables (IV) approach. All of these results can be attributed to the specific context of the wood processing industries in developing countries, characterized by labor-intensive operations and a predominant focus on low-complexity wood processing. The evidence suggests that the implementation of LEB policy should be complemented by additional industrial and employment policies. Such policies could, for example, facilitate the attraction of foreign direct investment (FDI), promote technology transfers, and foster the development of highly specialized training programs.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12451,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Forest Policy and Economics\",\"volume\":\"174 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103491\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Forest Policy and Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S138993412500070X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forest Policy and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S138993412500070X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究评估了 2006 年至 2018 年间采用原木出口禁令对 74 个发展中国家 1739 家木材加工企业就业情况的影响。利用熵平衡方法,我们的研究结果表明,与未采取LEB政策的国家相比,采取LEB政策的国家的企业就业总数显著增加。此外,我们还研究了 LEB 政策对各类就业的不同影响。我们的研究结果表明,LEB 的实施会显著增加生产性就业、永久性就业和非熟练劳动力,而对非生产性就业、临时性就业和熟练劳动力的影响在统计上并不显著。所有这些结果在使用另一种影响分析方法,即工具变量(IV)方法时都是稳健的。所有这些结果都可归因于发展中国家木材加工业的具体情况,其特点是劳动密集型经营和以低复杂性木材加工为主。这些证据表明,在实施低效益预算政策的同时,还应辅以其他产业和就业政策。例如,这些政策可以促进吸引外国直接投资 (FDI),推动技术转让,促进高度专业化培训计划的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Enhancing employment through log export ban: Insights from wood-processing firms in developing countries
This study assesses the impact of the adoption of the log export ban (LEB) on the employment of 1739 wood processing firms surveyed between 2006 and 2018 and located in 74 developing countries. Using the entropy balancing approach, our results suggest that LEB policy adoption significantly increases total employment in firms located in adopter countries compared to those in non-adopter countries. In addition, we examine the heterogeneous effects of LEB policy on various categories of employment. Our findings indicate that the implementation of LEB significantly increases production employment, permanent employment, and unskilled labor, while it does not exhibit a statistically significant impact on non-production employment, temporary employment, and skilled labor. All of these results are robust to the use of an alternative impact analysis method, that is, the instrumental variables (IV) approach. All of these results can be attributed to the specific context of the wood processing industries in developing countries, characterized by labor-intensive operations and a predominant focus on low-complexity wood processing. The evidence suggests that the implementation of LEB policy should be complemented by additional industrial and employment policies. Such policies could, for example, facilitate the attraction of foreign direct investment (FDI), promote technology transfers, and foster the development of highly specialized training programs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Forest Policy and Economics
Forest Policy and Economics 农林科学-林学
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
7.50%
发文量
148
审稿时长
21.9 weeks
期刊介绍: Forest Policy and Economics is a leading scientific journal that publishes peer-reviewed policy and economics research relating to forests, forested landscapes, forest-related industries, and other forest-relevant land uses. It also welcomes contributions from other social sciences and humanities perspectives that make clear theoretical, conceptual and methodological contributions to the existing state-of-the-art literature on forests and related land use systems. These disciplines include, but are not limited to, sociology, anthropology, human geography, history, jurisprudence, planning, development studies, and psychology research on forests. Forest Policy and Economics is global in scope and publishes multiple article types of high scientific standard. Acceptance for publication is subject to a double-blind peer-review process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信