缺失的酶:呼吁更新药理学分析实践以更好地进行药物安全性评估

IF 6.8 1区 医学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL
Monika Maciag,  and , Vardan T. Karamyan*, 
{"title":"缺失的酶:呼吁更新药理学分析实践以更好地进行药物安全性评估","authors":"Monika Maciag,&nbsp; and ,&nbsp;Vardan T. Karamyan*,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acs.jmedchem.4c0222810.1021/acs.jmedchem.4c02228","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Pharmacological profiling is critical for the development of safe drugs. With increasing awareness of its significance and attempts to share best practices, here we aimed to understand how pharmacological profiling is implemented and reported in the primary literature by analyzing the representation of nonkinase enzymes in selectivity screens. This aspect has been overlooked in previous publications, despite enzymes constituting a significant portion of the pharmacological targets for currently marketed drugs. Our analysis shows that while industry recommendations for improved pharmacological profiling have been widely adopted, enzymes remain largely underrepresented: about a quarter of studies did not include enzymes, and on average, enzymes comprise only 11% of all targets in pharmacological screens. We discuss possible reasons for this shortcoming and provide examples of critical enzymes missing from current screens. We conclude with the notion that selectivity screens should be expanded to include more enzymes to improve drug development and safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":46,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medicinal Chemistry","volume":"68 8","pages":"7854–7865 7854–7865"},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/epdf/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.4c02228","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Missing Enzymes: A Call to Update Pharmacological Profiling Practices for Better Drug Safety Assessment\",\"authors\":\"Monika Maciag,&nbsp; and ,&nbsp;Vardan T. Karamyan*,&nbsp;\",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acs.jmedchem.4c0222810.1021/acs.jmedchem.4c02228\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >Pharmacological profiling is critical for the development of safe drugs. With increasing awareness of its significance and attempts to share best practices, here we aimed to understand how pharmacological profiling is implemented and reported in the primary literature by analyzing the representation of nonkinase enzymes in selectivity screens. This aspect has been overlooked in previous publications, despite enzymes constituting a significant portion of the pharmacological targets for currently marketed drugs. Our analysis shows that while industry recommendations for improved pharmacological profiling have been widely adopted, enzymes remain largely underrepresented: about a quarter of studies did not include enzymes, and on average, enzymes comprise only 11% of all targets in pharmacological screens. We discuss possible reasons for this shortcoming and provide examples of critical enzymes missing from current screens. We conclude with the notion that selectivity screens should be expanded to include more enzymes to improve drug development and safety.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medicinal Chemistry\",\"volume\":\"68 8\",\"pages\":\"7854–7865 7854–7865\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/epdf/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.4c02228\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medicinal Chemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.4c02228\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medicinal Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.4c02228","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

药理学分析对安全药物的开发至关重要。随着人们对其重要性的认识不断提高,并试图分享最佳实践,我们的目标是通过分析选择性筛选中非激酶的表现,了解药理学分析是如何实现的,并在主要文献中报道。这方面在以前的出版物中被忽视了,尽管酶构成了目前上市药物的药理靶点的重要部分。我们的分析表明,虽然业界对改进药理学分析的建议已被广泛采用,但酶在很大程度上仍未得到充分代表:约四分之一的研究未包括酶,平均而言,酶仅占药理学筛选中所有靶点的11%。我们讨论了这一缺陷的可能原因,并提供了当前筛选中缺失的关键酶的例子。我们的结论是,选择性筛选应该扩大到包括更多的酶,以提高药物开发和安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Missing Enzymes: A Call to Update Pharmacological Profiling Practices for Better Drug Safety Assessment

Pharmacological profiling is critical for the development of safe drugs. With increasing awareness of its significance and attempts to share best practices, here we aimed to understand how pharmacological profiling is implemented and reported in the primary literature by analyzing the representation of nonkinase enzymes in selectivity screens. This aspect has been overlooked in previous publications, despite enzymes constituting a significant portion of the pharmacological targets for currently marketed drugs. Our analysis shows that while industry recommendations for improved pharmacological profiling have been widely adopted, enzymes remain largely underrepresented: about a quarter of studies did not include enzymes, and on average, enzymes comprise only 11% of all targets in pharmacological screens. We discuss possible reasons for this shortcoming and provide examples of critical enzymes missing from current screens. We conclude with the notion that selectivity screens should be expanded to include more enzymes to improve drug development and safety.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 医学-医药化学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
11.00%
发文量
804
审稿时长
1.9 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Medicinal Chemistry is a prestigious biweekly peer-reviewed publication that focuses on the multifaceted field of medicinal chemistry. Since its inception in 1959 as the Journal of Medicinal and Pharmaceutical Chemistry, it has evolved to become a cornerstone in the dissemination of research findings related to the design, synthesis, and development of therapeutic agents. The Journal of Medicinal Chemistry is recognized for its significant impact in the scientific community, as evidenced by its 2022 impact factor of 7.3. This metric reflects the journal's influence and the importance of its content in shaping the future of drug discovery and development. The journal serves as a vital resource for chemists, pharmacologists, and other researchers interested in the molecular mechanisms of drug action and the optimization of therapeutic compounds.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信