Sarah Sandmann, Stefan Hegselmann, Michael Fujarski, Lucas Bickmann, Benjamin Wild, Roland Eils, Julian Varghese
{"title":"DeepSeek大型语言模型在临床决策中的基准评价","authors":"Sarah Sandmann, Stefan Hegselmann, Michael Fujarski, Lucas Bickmann, Benjamin Wild, Roland Eils, Julian Varghese","doi":"10.1038/s41591-025-03727-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly transforming medical applications. However, proprietary models such as GPT-4o face significant barriers to clinical adoption because they cannot be deployed on site within healthcare institutions, making them non-compliant with stringent privacy regulations. Recent advancements in open-source LLMs such as DeepSeek models offer a promising alternative since they allow efficient fine-tuning on local data in hospitals with advanced IT infrastructure. To demonstrate the clinical utility of DeepSeek-V3 and DeepSeek-R1, we benchmarked their performance on clinical decision support tasks against proprietary LLMs, including GPT-4o and Gemini-2.0 Flash Thinking Experimental. Using 125 patient cases with sufficient statistical power, covering a broad range of frequent and rare diseases, we found that DeepSeek models perform equally well and in some cases better than proprietary LLMs. Our study demonstrates that open-source LLMs can provide a scalable pathway for secure model training enabling real-world medical applications in accordance with data privacy and healthcare regulations.</p>","PeriodicalId":19037,"journal":{"name":"Nature Medicine","volume":"34 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":58.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Benchmark evaluation of DeepSeek large language models in clinical decision-making\",\"authors\":\"Sarah Sandmann, Stefan Hegselmann, Michael Fujarski, Lucas Bickmann, Benjamin Wild, Roland Eils, Julian Varghese\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41591-025-03727-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly transforming medical applications. However, proprietary models such as GPT-4o face significant barriers to clinical adoption because they cannot be deployed on site within healthcare institutions, making them non-compliant with stringent privacy regulations. Recent advancements in open-source LLMs such as DeepSeek models offer a promising alternative since they allow efficient fine-tuning on local data in hospitals with advanced IT infrastructure. To demonstrate the clinical utility of DeepSeek-V3 and DeepSeek-R1, we benchmarked their performance on clinical decision support tasks against proprietary LLMs, including GPT-4o and Gemini-2.0 Flash Thinking Experimental. Using 125 patient cases with sufficient statistical power, covering a broad range of frequent and rare diseases, we found that DeepSeek models perform equally well and in some cases better than proprietary LLMs. Our study demonstrates that open-source LLMs can provide a scalable pathway for secure model training enabling real-world medical applications in accordance with data privacy and healthcare regulations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19037,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nature Medicine\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":58.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nature Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-025-03727-2\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-025-03727-2","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Benchmark evaluation of DeepSeek large language models in clinical decision-making
Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly transforming medical applications. However, proprietary models such as GPT-4o face significant barriers to clinical adoption because they cannot be deployed on site within healthcare institutions, making them non-compliant with stringent privacy regulations. Recent advancements in open-source LLMs such as DeepSeek models offer a promising alternative since they allow efficient fine-tuning on local data in hospitals with advanced IT infrastructure. To demonstrate the clinical utility of DeepSeek-V3 and DeepSeek-R1, we benchmarked their performance on clinical decision support tasks against proprietary LLMs, including GPT-4o and Gemini-2.0 Flash Thinking Experimental. Using 125 patient cases with sufficient statistical power, covering a broad range of frequent and rare diseases, we found that DeepSeek models perform equally well and in some cases better than proprietary LLMs. Our study demonstrates that open-source LLMs can provide a scalable pathway for secure model training enabling real-world medical applications in accordance with data privacy and healthcare regulations.
期刊介绍:
Nature Medicine is a monthly journal publishing original peer-reviewed research in all areas of medicine. The publication focuses on originality, timeliness, interdisciplinary interest, and the impact on improving human health. In addition to research articles, Nature Medicine also publishes commissioned content such as News, Reviews, and Perspectives. This content aims to provide context for the latest advances in translational and clinical research, reaching a wide audience of M.D. and Ph.D. readers. All editorial decisions for the journal are made by a team of full-time professional editors.
Nature Medicine consider all types of clinical research, including:
-Case-reports and small case series
-Clinical trials, whether phase 1, 2, 3 or 4
-Observational studies
-Meta-analyses
-Biomarker studies
-Public and global health studies
Nature Medicine is also committed to facilitating communication between translational and clinical researchers. As such, we consider “hybrid” studies with preclinical and translational findings reported alongside data from clinical studies.