Andreas Skolarikos, Robert Geraghty, Bhaskar Somani, Thomas Tailly, Helene Jung, Andreas Neisius, Ales Petřík, Guido M. Kamphuis, Niall Davis, Carla Bezuidenhout, Michael Lardas, Giovanni Gambaro, John A. Sayer, Riccardo Lombardo, Lazaros Tzelves
{"title":"欧洲泌尿外科协会尿石症的诊断和治疗指南","authors":"Andreas Skolarikos, Robert Geraghty, Bhaskar Somani, Thomas Tailly, Helene Jung, Andreas Neisius, Ales Petřík, Guido M. Kamphuis, Niall Davis, Carla Bezuidenhout, Michael Lardas, Giovanni Gambaro, John A. Sayer, Riccardo Lombardo, Lazaros Tzelves","doi":"10.1016/j.eururo.2025.03.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Background and objective</h3>The European Association of Urology urolithiasis guidelines provide evidence-based recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of urinary stone disease. Given the complexity and variability of stone formation, individualised patient management is emphasised.<h3>Methods</h3>The guidelines incorporate evidence from the latest research and focus on risk assessment, imaging techniques, pharmacological management, and surgical interventions. A research librarian conducted literature searches for urolithiasis in the Cochrane Library, Medline, and Embase databases via Dialog-Datastar. The strength of recommendations is also rated.<h3>Key findings and limitations</h3>Diagnosis relies on a combination of clinical history, biochemical evaluation, and imaging, with ultrasound as the first-line modality and low-dose computed tomography as the gold standard for precise stone assessment. Stone composition and burden influence treatment decisions with algorithms primarily based on stone size, location, and composition. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are recommended for first-line pain management, with opioids reserved as a secondary option. Medical expulsive therapy with α-blockers may be considered for selected patients with ureteral stones. Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy, ureteroscopy, and percutaneous nephrolithotomy remain the primary intervention modalities, with selection based on stone characteristics and patient factors. Advances in multiplanar imaging have improved assessment of the stone burden, although further research is needed to refine predictive models. Genetic testing is recommended for high-risk patients to guide personalised treatment.<h3>Conclusions and clinical implications</h3>The guidelines provide a framework for clinical decision-making while acknowledging the need for continued advances in urolithiasis.","PeriodicalId":12223,"journal":{"name":"European urology","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":25.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"European Association of Urology Guidelines on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Urolithiasis\",\"authors\":\"Andreas Skolarikos, Robert Geraghty, Bhaskar Somani, Thomas Tailly, Helene Jung, Andreas Neisius, Ales Petřík, Guido M. Kamphuis, Niall Davis, Carla Bezuidenhout, Michael Lardas, Giovanni Gambaro, John A. Sayer, Riccardo Lombardo, Lazaros Tzelves\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eururo.2025.03.011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3>Background and objective</h3>The European Association of Urology urolithiasis guidelines provide evidence-based recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of urinary stone disease. Given the complexity and variability of stone formation, individualised patient management is emphasised.<h3>Methods</h3>The guidelines incorporate evidence from the latest research and focus on risk assessment, imaging techniques, pharmacological management, and surgical interventions. A research librarian conducted literature searches for urolithiasis in the Cochrane Library, Medline, and Embase databases via Dialog-Datastar. The strength of recommendations is also rated.<h3>Key findings and limitations</h3>Diagnosis relies on a combination of clinical history, biochemical evaluation, and imaging, with ultrasound as the first-line modality and low-dose computed tomography as the gold standard for precise stone assessment. Stone composition and burden influence treatment decisions with algorithms primarily based on stone size, location, and composition. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are recommended for first-line pain management, with opioids reserved as a secondary option. Medical expulsive therapy with α-blockers may be considered for selected patients with ureteral stones. Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy, ureteroscopy, and percutaneous nephrolithotomy remain the primary intervention modalities, with selection based on stone characteristics and patient factors. Advances in multiplanar imaging have improved assessment of the stone burden, although further research is needed to refine predictive models. Genetic testing is recommended for high-risk patients to guide personalised treatment.<h3>Conclusions and clinical implications</h3>The guidelines provide a framework for clinical decision-making while acknowledging the need for continued advances in urolithiasis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12223,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European urology\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":25.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2025.03.011\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2025.03.011","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
European Association of Urology Guidelines on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Urolithiasis
Background and objective
The European Association of Urology urolithiasis guidelines provide evidence-based recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of urinary stone disease. Given the complexity and variability of stone formation, individualised patient management is emphasised.
Methods
The guidelines incorporate evidence from the latest research and focus on risk assessment, imaging techniques, pharmacological management, and surgical interventions. A research librarian conducted literature searches for urolithiasis in the Cochrane Library, Medline, and Embase databases via Dialog-Datastar. The strength of recommendations is also rated.
Key findings and limitations
Diagnosis relies on a combination of clinical history, biochemical evaluation, and imaging, with ultrasound as the first-line modality and low-dose computed tomography as the gold standard for precise stone assessment. Stone composition and burden influence treatment decisions with algorithms primarily based on stone size, location, and composition. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are recommended for first-line pain management, with opioids reserved as a secondary option. Medical expulsive therapy with α-blockers may be considered for selected patients with ureteral stones. Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy, ureteroscopy, and percutaneous nephrolithotomy remain the primary intervention modalities, with selection based on stone characteristics and patient factors. Advances in multiplanar imaging have improved assessment of the stone burden, although further research is needed to refine predictive models. Genetic testing is recommended for high-risk patients to guide personalised treatment.
Conclusions and clinical implications
The guidelines provide a framework for clinical decision-making while acknowledging the need for continued advances in urolithiasis.
期刊介绍:
European Urology is a peer-reviewed journal that publishes original articles and reviews on a broad spectrum of urological issues. Covering topics such as oncology, impotence, infertility, pediatrics, lithiasis and endourology, the journal also highlights recent advances in techniques, instrumentation, surgery, and pediatric urology. This comprehensive approach provides readers with an in-depth guide to international developments in urology.