{"title":"“第二支箭”:一项关于从一次漫长的COVID之旅中学到什么的协作性自我民族学探索","authors":"Sarahjane Belton, Kate Sheridan","doi":"10.1111/hex.70227","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Long COVID is a complex multisystem illness with multiple relapsing-remitting symptoms, which can vary in severity and impact people's daily lives. This study utilises the first author's experience of falling ill with and recovering from long COVID to investigate the lived experience of the illness. Learnings that could positively influence how people with long COVID, and health professionals, approach rehabilitation and recovery from the illness going forward are identified.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Employing collaborative autoethnography, the first author investigated her personal experience of falling ill with, and rehabilitating from, long COVID, while soliciting input of the second author (an athletic therapist and physiotherapist, and researcher with expertise in chronic pain) for the purpose of analysis and interpretation. Reflexive thematic analysis was employed across a number of data sources available to the first author, including journal entries, text messages, emails, and pharmacy receipts.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Four themes were generated from the data, supported by a number of subthemes: (i) Psychosocial impact of long COVID, (ii) Invalidated, (iii) Validated, and (iv) Power and Ownership. The negative impact of a siloed and reductionist approach to care for long COVID is evident in the findings of this study. In addition, the need for healthcare environments that enhance autonomy and empowerment, and that implement patient-centred care, where the person living with chronic illness is supported to engage in management strategies that meet their needs, is underlined.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>This study highlights the detrimental cost, both personally and financially, of the ongoing use of the biomedical model of care in the treatment of long COVID. Findings support the need for an interdisciplinary approach to care that considers the whole person and adopts a biopsychosocial approach to care. Furthermore, the need for healthcare professionals to actively listen to, respect, validate and support the person living with long COVID on their individualised recovery journey is evident.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Patient or Public Contribution</h3>\n \n <p>The first author was a long COVID patient, the context and extent of this is explained within the paper. As such, this paper is developed and written primarily from the perspective of a patient, as a first-hand narrative of the recovery journey from the illness, with the insights of a clinician (second author) providing context and the potential for a broader understanding of the journey. The goal of this work is, through the dissemination of the paper's findings, to improve pathways and outcomes for others living with long COVID.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55070,"journal":{"name":"Health Expectations","volume":"28 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/hex.70227","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"‘The Second Arrow’: A Collaborative Autoethnographic Exploration of What Can Be Learned From One Long COVID Journey\",\"authors\":\"Sarahjane Belton, Kate Sheridan\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/hex.70227\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>Long COVID is a complex multisystem illness with multiple relapsing-remitting symptoms, which can vary in severity and impact people's daily lives. This study utilises the first author's experience of falling ill with and recovering from long COVID to investigate the lived experience of the illness. Learnings that could positively influence how people with long COVID, and health professionals, approach rehabilitation and recovery from the illness going forward are identified.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Employing collaborative autoethnography, the first author investigated her personal experience of falling ill with, and rehabilitating from, long COVID, while soliciting input of the second author (an athletic therapist and physiotherapist, and researcher with expertise in chronic pain) for the purpose of analysis and interpretation. Reflexive thematic analysis was employed across a number of data sources available to the first author, including journal entries, text messages, emails, and pharmacy receipts.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Four themes were generated from the data, supported by a number of subthemes: (i) Psychosocial impact of long COVID, (ii) Invalidated, (iii) Validated, and (iv) Power and Ownership. The negative impact of a siloed and reductionist approach to care for long COVID is evident in the findings of this study. In addition, the need for healthcare environments that enhance autonomy and empowerment, and that implement patient-centred care, where the person living with chronic illness is supported to engage in management strategies that meet their needs, is underlined.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study highlights the detrimental cost, both personally and financially, of the ongoing use of the biomedical model of care in the treatment of long COVID. Findings support the need for an interdisciplinary approach to care that considers the whole person and adopts a biopsychosocial approach to care. Furthermore, the need for healthcare professionals to actively listen to, respect, validate and support the person living with long COVID on their individualised recovery journey is evident.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Patient or Public Contribution</h3>\\n \\n <p>The first author was a long COVID patient, the context and extent of this is explained within the paper. As such, this paper is developed and written primarily from the perspective of a patient, as a first-hand narrative of the recovery journey from the illness, with the insights of a clinician (second author) providing context and the potential for a broader understanding of the journey. The goal of this work is, through the dissemination of the paper's findings, to improve pathways and outcomes for others living with long COVID.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55070,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Expectations\",\"volume\":\"28 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/hex.70227\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Expectations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hex.70227\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Expectations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hex.70227","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
‘The Second Arrow’: A Collaborative Autoethnographic Exploration of What Can Be Learned From One Long COVID Journey
Introduction
Long COVID is a complex multisystem illness with multiple relapsing-remitting symptoms, which can vary in severity and impact people's daily lives. This study utilises the first author's experience of falling ill with and recovering from long COVID to investigate the lived experience of the illness. Learnings that could positively influence how people with long COVID, and health professionals, approach rehabilitation and recovery from the illness going forward are identified.
Methods
Employing collaborative autoethnography, the first author investigated her personal experience of falling ill with, and rehabilitating from, long COVID, while soliciting input of the second author (an athletic therapist and physiotherapist, and researcher with expertise in chronic pain) for the purpose of analysis and interpretation. Reflexive thematic analysis was employed across a number of data sources available to the first author, including journal entries, text messages, emails, and pharmacy receipts.
Results
Four themes were generated from the data, supported by a number of subthemes: (i) Psychosocial impact of long COVID, (ii) Invalidated, (iii) Validated, and (iv) Power and Ownership. The negative impact of a siloed and reductionist approach to care for long COVID is evident in the findings of this study. In addition, the need for healthcare environments that enhance autonomy and empowerment, and that implement patient-centred care, where the person living with chronic illness is supported to engage in management strategies that meet their needs, is underlined.
Conclusion
This study highlights the detrimental cost, both personally and financially, of the ongoing use of the biomedical model of care in the treatment of long COVID. Findings support the need for an interdisciplinary approach to care that considers the whole person and adopts a biopsychosocial approach to care. Furthermore, the need for healthcare professionals to actively listen to, respect, validate and support the person living with long COVID on their individualised recovery journey is evident.
Patient or Public Contribution
The first author was a long COVID patient, the context and extent of this is explained within the paper. As such, this paper is developed and written primarily from the perspective of a patient, as a first-hand narrative of the recovery journey from the illness, with the insights of a clinician (second author) providing context and the potential for a broader understanding of the journey. The goal of this work is, through the dissemination of the paper's findings, to improve pathways and outcomes for others living with long COVID.
期刊介绍:
Health Expectations promotes critical thinking and informed debate about all aspects of patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) in health and social care, health policy and health services research including:
• Person-centred care and quality improvement
• Patients'' participation in decisions about disease prevention and management
• Public perceptions of health services
• Citizen involvement in health care policy making and priority-setting
• Methods for monitoring and evaluating participation
• Empowerment and consumerism
• Patients'' role in safety and quality
• Patient and public role in health services research
• Co-production (researchers working with patients and the public) of research, health care and policy
Health Expectations is a quarterly, peer-reviewed journal publishing original research, review articles and critical commentaries. It includes papers which clarify concepts, develop theories, and critically analyse and evaluate specific policies and practices. The Journal provides an inter-disciplinary and international forum in which researchers (including PPIE researchers) from a range of backgrounds and expertise can present their work to other researchers, policy-makers, health care professionals, managers, patients and consumer advocates.