船用直接氨固体氧化物燃料电池集成系统的技术经济分析

IF 1.8 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL
Ph.D., Prof. Phan Anh Duong, Ph.D. Bo Rim Ryu, Prof. Jinuk Lee, Ph.D., Prof. Hokeun Kang
{"title":"船用直接氨固体氧化物燃料电池集成系统的技术经济分析","authors":"Ph.D., Prof. Phan Anh Duong,&nbsp;Ph.D. Bo Rim Ryu,&nbsp;Prof. Jinuk Lee,&nbsp;Ph.D., Prof. Hokeun Kang","doi":"10.1002/ceat.12013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>To achieve the ambitious goal of net-zero greenhouse gas emissions in the shipping industry by 2050, the getting to zero coalition prioritizes the adoption of zero-emission fuels and technologies. Ammonia stands out as a viable zero-carbon marine fuel, owing to its carbon-free composition and higher energy density relative to hydrogen. This paper presents a thorough techno-economic analysis of a direct ammonia solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) system, which is enhanced by a gas turbine (GT) and integrated with a multi-generation system, including proton exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFC), organic Rankine cycle (ORC), Kalina cycle (KC), steam Rankine cycle (SRC), and waste heat boiler (WHB). The study employs a multi-stage approach that includes dynamic computational analysis, techno-economic evaluation, and assessments of environmental and social impacts to determine the optimal system implementation. Economic viability is evaluated through indicators such as net present value, internal rate of return and payback period, highlighting the critical role of fuel cell capital costs in investment feasibility, and repayment timelines. The levelized cost of electricity (LCOE) spans from 0.482 to 0.554 $ (kW h)<sup>−1</sup>, showing a variation of approximately 6.2 % from the average LCOE. For unsubsidized and subsidized utility costs, the discounted payback period is calculated to be between 6.7 and 9.5 years, respectively.</p>","PeriodicalId":10083,"journal":{"name":"Chemical Engineering & Technology","volume":"48 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Techno-Economic Analysis of a Direct Ammonia Solid Oxide Fuel Cell–Integrated System for Marine Vessels\",\"authors\":\"Ph.D., Prof. Phan Anh Duong,&nbsp;Ph.D. Bo Rim Ryu,&nbsp;Prof. Jinuk Lee,&nbsp;Ph.D., Prof. Hokeun Kang\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ceat.12013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>To achieve the ambitious goal of net-zero greenhouse gas emissions in the shipping industry by 2050, the getting to zero coalition prioritizes the adoption of zero-emission fuels and technologies. Ammonia stands out as a viable zero-carbon marine fuel, owing to its carbon-free composition and higher energy density relative to hydrogen. This paper presents a thorough techno-economic analysis of a direct ammonia solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) system, which is enhanced by a gas turbine (GT) and integrated with a multi-generation system, including proton exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFC), organic Rankine cycle (ORC), Kalina cycle (KC), steam Rankine cycle (SRC), and waste heat boiler (WHB). The study employs a multi-stage approach that includes dynamic computational analysis, techno-economic evaluation, and assessments of environmental and social impacts to determine the optimal system implementation. Economic viability is evaluated through indicators such as net present value, internal rate of return and payback period, highlighting the critical role of fuel cell capital costs in investment feasibility, and repayment timelines. The levelized cost of electricity (LCOE) spans from 0.482 to 0.554 $ (kW h)<sup>−1</sup>, showing a variation of approximately 6.2 % from the average LCOE. For unsubsidized and subsidized utility costs, the discounted payback period is calculated to be between 6.7 and 9.5 years, respectively.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10083,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chemical Engineering & Technology\",\"volume\":\"48 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chemical Engineering & Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ceat.12013\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemical Engineering & Technology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ceat.12013","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了实现航运业到2050年实现净零温室气体排放的宏伟目标,零排放联盟优先考虑采用零排放燃料和技术。氨作为一种可行的零碳船用燃料脱颖而出,因为它的无碳成分和相对于氢更高的能量密度。本文对直接氨固体氧化物燃料电池(SOFC)系统进行了全面的技术经济分析,该系统由燃气轮机(GT)增强,并集成了包括质子交换膜燃料电池(PEMFC)、有机朗肯循环(ORC)、Kalina循环(KC)、蒸汽朗肯循环(SRC)和废热锅炉(WHB)在内的多代系统。该研究采用多阶段方法,包括动态计算分析、技术经济评估以及环境和社会影响评估,以确定最佳的系统实施。经济可行性通过净现值、内部回报率和回收期等指标进行评估,突出了燃料电池资本成本在投资可行性和还款时间表中的关键作用。平准化电力成本(LCOE)范围为0.482至0.554美元(千瓦时)−1,与平均LCOE相差约6.2%。对于未补贴和补贴的公用事业成本,贴现回收期分别在6.7至9.5年之间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Techno-Economic Analysis of a Direct Ammonia Solid Oxide Fuel Cell–Integrated System for Marine Vessels

To achieve the ambitious goal of net-zero greenhouse gas emissions in the shipping industry by 2050, the getting to zero coalition prioritizes the adoption of zero-emission fuels and technologies. Ammonia stands out as a viable zero-carbon marine fuel, owing to its carbon-free composition and higher energy density relative to hydrogen. This paper presents a thorough techno-economic analysis of a direct ammonia solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) system, which is enhanced by a gas turbine (GT) and integrated with a multi-generation system, including proton exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFC), organic Rankine cycle (ORC), Kalina cycle (KC), steam Rankine cycle (SRC), and waste heat boiler (WHB). The study employs a multi-stage approach that includes dynamic computational analysis, techno-economic evaluation, and assessments of environmental and social impacts to determine the optimal system implementation. Economic viability is evaluated through indicators such as net present value, internal rate of return and payback period, highlighting the critical role of fuel cell capital costs in investment feasibility, and repayment timelines. The levelized cost of electricity (LCOE) spans from 0.482 to 0.554 $ (kW h)−1, showing a variation of approximately 6.2 % from the average LCOE. For unsubsidized and subsidized utility costs, the discounted payback period is calculated to be between 6.7 and 9.5 years, respectively.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Chemical Engineering & Technology
Chemical Engineering & Technology 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
4.80%
发文量
315
审稿时长
5.5 months
期刊介绍: This is the journal for chemical engineers looking for first-hand information in all areas of chemical and process engineering. Chemical Engineering & Technology is: Competent with contributions written and refereed by outstanding professionals from around the world. Essential because it is an international forum for the exchange of ideas and experiences. Topical because its articles treat the very latest developments in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信