{"title":"spinosad和spinetoram对柑橘瘿蜂(brchophagus fellis)的防治效果及其对柑橘有益节肢动物的影响","authors":"Lisa S. Kirkland, Meena Thakur, Jianhua Mo","doi":"10.1111/aen.70005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The citrus gall wasp, <i>Bruchophagus fellis</i>, is a significant pest in Australian citrus production. It particularly affects Valencia citrus growers, as the available chemical control options are considered unsuitable due to persistence of residues and associated long withholding periods, or too costly. We investigated the effectiveness of two spinosyn-based foliar products, spinosad and spinetoram, for controlling <i>B. fellis</i> and their impact on beneficial arthropods in citrus orchards. Both chemicals demonstrated efficacy, with over 98% mortality in <i>B. fellis</i> adults within 24 h of direct application in laboratory tests. Residual toxicity assessments showed prolonged efficacy, with spinetoram remaining toxic to <i>B. fellis</i> for up to 21 days and spinosad for up to 14 days post-spray. Spinetoram appears more toxic to <i>B. fellis</i> than spinosad. A field trial confirmed efficacy of both active ingredients in reducing <i>B. fellis</i> infestations, particularly with well-timed applications before peak adult <i>B. fellis</i> emergence. A double-spray application of spinetoram (1 week apart) showed the most effective control, with 66% reduction in gall weights and 84% reduction in the proportion of large galls compared to the untreated control. Four important beneficial arthropods [<i>Aphytis lingnanensis</i> (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae), <i>Cryptolaemus montrouzieri</i> (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae), <i>Mallada signatus</i> (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) and <i>Neoseiulus californicus</i> (Acari: Phytoseiidae)] of Australian citrus orchards were selected for the toxicity studies. Spinosad and spinetoram appeared relatively safe to <i>C. montrouzieri</i> and <i>M. signatus</i> but were highly toxic to <i>A. lingnanensis</i> and <i>N. californicus</i>. Based on these findings, spinetoram could be a good foliar application option for Valencia growers to target adult <i>B. fellis</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":8574,"journal":{"name":"Austral Entomology","volume":"64 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of spinosad and spinetoram against the citrus gall wasp, Bruchophagus fellis (Hymenoptera: Eurytomidae), and their impacts on beneficial arthropods in citrus\",\"authors\":\"Lisa S. Kirkland, Meena Thakur, Jianhua Mo\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/aen.70005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The citrus gall wasp, <i>Bruchophagus fellis</i>, is a significant pest in Australian citrus production. It particularly affects Valencia citrus growers, as the available chemical control options are considered unsuitable due to persistence of residues and associated long withholding periods, or too costly. We investigated the effectiveness of two spinosyn-based foliar products, spinosad and spinetoram, for controlling <i>B. fellis</i> and their impact on beneficial arthropods in citrus orchards. Both chemicals demonstrated efficacy, with over 98% mortality in <i>B. fellis</i> adults within 24 h of direct application in laboratory tests. Residual toxicity assessments showed prolonged efficacy, with spinetoram remaining toxic to <i>B. fellis</i> for up to 21 days and spinosad for up to 14 days post-spray. Spinetoram appears more toxic to <i>B. fellis</i> than spinosad. A field trial confirmed efficacy of both active ingredients in reducing <i>B. fellis</i> infestations, particularly with well-timed applications before peak adult <i>B. fellis</i> emergence. A double-spray application of spinetoram (1 week apart) showed the most effective control, with 66% reduction in gall weights and 84% reduction in the proportion of large galls compared to the untreated control. Four important beneficial arthropods [<i>Aphytis lingnanensis</i> (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae), <i>Cryptolaemus montrouzieri</i> (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae), <i>Mallada signatus</i> (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) and <i>Neoseiulus californicus</i> (Acari: Phytoseiidae)] of Australian citrus orchards were selected for the toxicity studies. Spinosad and spinetoram appeared relatively safe to <i>C. montrouzieri</i> and <i>M. signatus</i> but were highly toxic to <i>A. lingnanensis</i> and <i>N. californicus</i>. Based on these findings, spinetoram could be a good foliar application option for Valencia growers to target adult <i>B. fellis</i>.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8574,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Austral Entomology\",\"volume\":\"64 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Austral Entomology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aen.70005\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENTOMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Austral Entomology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aen.70005","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENTOMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Effectiveness of spinosad and spinetoram against the citrus gall wasp, Bruchophagus fellis (Hymenoptera: Eurytomidae), and their impacts on beneficial arthropods in citrus
The citrus gall wasp, Bruchophagus fellis, is a significant pest in Australian citrus production. It particularly affects Valencia citrus growers, as the available chemical control options are considered unsuitable due to persistence of residues and associated long withholding periods, or too costly. We investigated the effectiveness of two spinosyn-based foliar products, spinosad and spinetoram, for controlling B. fellis and their impact on beneficial arthropods in citrus orchards. Both chemicals demonstrated efficacy, with over 98% mortality in B. fellis adults within 24 h of direct application in laboratory tests. Residual toxicity assessments showed prolonged efficacy, with spinetoram remaining toxic to B. fellis for up to 21 days and spinosad for up to 14 days post-spray. Spinetoram appears more toxic to B. fellis than spinosad. A field trial confirmed efficacy of both active ingredients in reducing B. fellis infestations, particularly with well-timed applications before peak adult B. fellis emergence. A double-spray application of spinetoram (1 week apart) showed the most effective control, with 66% reduction in gall weights and 84% reduction in the proportion of large galls compared to the untreated control. Four important beneficial arthropods [Aphytis lingnanensis (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae), Cryptolaemus montrouzieri (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae), Mallada signatus (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) and Neoseiulus californicus (Acari: Phytoseiidae)] of Australian citrus orchards were selected for the toxicity studies. Spinosad and spinetoram appeared relatively safe to C. montrouzieri and M. signatus but were highly toxic to A. lingnanensis and N. californicus. Based on these findings, spinetoram could be a good foliar application option for Valencia growers to target adult B. fellis.
期刊介绍:
Austral Entomology is a scientific journal of entomology for the Southern Hemisphere. It publishes Original Articles that are peer-reviewed research papers from the study of the behaviour, biology, biosystematics, conservation biology, ecology, evolution, forensic and medical entomology, molecular biology, public health, urban entomology, physiology and the use and control of insects, arachnids and myriapods. The journal also publishes Reviews on research and theory or commentaries on current areas of research, innovation or rapid development likely to be of broad interest – these may be submitted or invited. Book Reviews will also be considered provided the works are of global significance. Manuscripts from authors in the Northern Hemisphere are encouraged provided that the research has relevance to or broad readership within the Southern Hemisphere. All submissions are peer-reviewed by at least two referees expert in the field of the submitted paper. Special issues are encouraged; please contact the Chief Editor for further information.