Jun Xu, Xiaoli Hu, Xiaoyun Su, Shen Gui, Ziqiao Lei, Xiaoming Liu, Xiangzhi Zhou, Lixia Wang, Wenjun Wu, Xiangchuang Kong
{"title":"用延迟扫描优化对比增强的臂丛磁共振神经成像","authors":"Jun Xu, Xiaoli Hu, Xiaoyun Su, Shen Gui, Ziqiao Lei, Xiaoming Liu, Xiangzhi Zhou, Lixia Wang, Wenjun Wu, Xiangchuang Kong","doi":"10.1002/ird3.120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance neurography (ceMRN) can enhance brachial plexus visualization and quality of imaging. However, the interval between contrast injection and scanning that provides the highest-quality images is not known.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Fifteen patients underwent brachial plexus imaging using the 3D T2-NerveView sequence with a scanning duration of 5 min. A consecutive six-phase scan was initiated immediately at the start of contrast agent injection. Subsequently, all patients' images were classified into six groups according to the phases: group A (phase 1, delay 0 min), group B (phase 2, delay 5 min), group C (phase 3, delay 10 min), group D (phase 4, delay 15 min), group E (phase 5, delay 20 min), and group F (phase 6, delay 25 min). The image quality in each group was assessed based on nerve signal (signal<sub>nerve</sub>), muscle signal (signal<sub>muscle</sub>), lymph node signal (signal<sub>lymph node</sub>), background noise (BN), signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and subjective score.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Signal<sub>nerve</sub>, signal<sub>muscle</sub>, BN, and SNR did not significantly differ among the six groups (<i>p</i> > 0.05). However, significant differences (<i>p</i> < 0.05) were observed in signal<sub>lymph node</sub> (<i>F</i> = 16.067), CNR (<i>F</i> = 9.495), and subjective score (<i>χ</i><sup>2</sup> = 23.586). As the scanning delay increased, signal<sub>lymph node</sub> intensity gradually increased whereas the CNR gradually decreased. The subjective score was significantly higher in groups B (4.83 ± 0.24), C (4.90 ± 0.21), D (4.87 ± 0.30), E (4.83 ± 0.31), and F (4.83 ± 0.31) than in group A (4.47 ± 0.30).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>We recommend performing brachial plexus ceMRN 5 min after contrast injection. With this delay, the brachial plexus can be visualized optimally with minimal interference from background signals.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":73508,"journal":{"name":"iRadiology","volume":"3 2","pages":"168-175"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ird3.120","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimizing Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Neurography of the Brachial Plexus With Delayed Scanning\",\"authors\":\"Jun Xu, Xiaoli Hu, Xiaoyun Su, Shen Gui, Ziqiao Lei, Xiaoming Liu, Xiangzhi Zhou, Lixia Wang, Wenjun Wu, Xiangchuang Kong\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ird3.120\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance neurography (ceMRN) can enhance brachial plexus visualization and quality of imaging. However, the interval between contrast injection and scanning that provides the highest-quality images is not known.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Fifteen patients underwent brachial plexus imaging using the 3D T2-NerveView sequence with a scanning duration of 5 min. A consecutive six-phase scan was initiated immediately at the start of contrast agent injection. Subsequently, all patients' images were classified into six groups according to the phases: group A (phase 1, delay 0 min), group B (phase 2, delay 5 min), group C (phase 3, delay 10 min), group D (phase 4, delay 15 min), group E (phase 5, delay 20 min), and group F (phase 6, delay 25 min). The image quality in each group was assessed based on nerve signal (signal<sub>nerve</sub>), muscle signal (signal<sub>muscle</sub>), lymph node signal (signal<sub>lymph node</sub>), background noise (BN), signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and subjective score.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Signal<sub>nerve</sub>, signal<sub>muscle</sub>, BN, and SNR did not significantly differ among the six groups (<i>p</i> > 0.05). However, significant differences (<i>p</i> < 0.05) were observed in signal<sub>lymph node</sub> (<i>F</i> = 16.067), CNR (<i>F</i> = 9.495), and subjective score (<i>χ</i><sup>2</sup> = 23.586). As the scanning delay increased, signal<sub>lymph node</sub> intensity gradually increased whereas the CNR gradually decreased. The subjective score was significantly higher in groups B (4.83 ± 0.24), C (4.90 ± 0.21), D (4.87 ± 0.30), E (4.83 ± 0.31), and F (4.83 ± 0.31) than in group A (4.47 ± 0.30).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>We recommend performing brachial plexus ceMRN 5 min after contrast injection. With this delay, the brachial plexus can be visualized optimally with minimal interference from background signals.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73508,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"iRadiology\",\"volume\":\"3 2\",\"pages\":\"168-175\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ird3.120\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"iRadiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ird3.120\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"iRadiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ird3.120","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Optimizing Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Neurography of the Brachial Plexus With Delayed Scanning
Background
Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance neurography (ceMRN) can enhance brachial plexus visualization and quality of imaging. However, the interval between contrast injection and scanning that provides the highest-quality images is not known.
Methods
Fifteen patients underwent brachial plexus imaging using the 3D T2-NerveView sequence with a scanning duration of 5 min. A consecutive six-phase scan was initiated immediately at the start of contrast agent injection. Subsequently, all patients' images were classified into six groups according to the phases: group A (phase 1, delay 0 min), group B (phase 2, delay 5 min), group C (phase 3, delay 10 min), group D (phase 4, delay 15 min), group E (phase 5, delay 20 min), and group F (phase 6, delay 25 min). The image quality in each group was assessed based on nerve signal (signalnerve), muscle signal (signalmuscle), lymph node signal (signallymph node), background noise (BN), signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and subjective score.
Results
Signalnerve, signalmuscle, BN, and SNR did not significantly differ among the six groups (p > 0.05). However, significant differences (p < 0.05) were observed in signallymph node (F = 16.067), CNR (F = 9.495), and subjective score (χ2 = 23.586). As the scanning delay increased, signallymph node intensity gradually increased whereas the CNR gradually decreased. The subjective score was significantly higher in groups B (4.83 ± 0.24), C (4.90 ± 0.21), D (4.87 ± 0.30), E (4.83 ± 0.31), and F (4.83 ± 0.31) than in group A (4.47 ± 0.30).
Conclusion
We recommend performing brachial plexus ceMRN 5 min after contrast injection. With this delay, the brachial plexus can be visualized optimally with minimal interference from background signals.