增强运动后氧动力学建模的生理边界和手动V o 2基线输入:一种新方法

Süleyman Ulupınar, İzzet İnce, Cebrail Gençoğlu, Serhat Özbay, Salih Çabuk
{"title":"增强运动后氧动力学建模的生理边界和手动V o 2基线输入:一种新方法","authors":"Süleyman Ulupınar,&nbsp;İzzet İnce,&nbsp;Cebrail Gençoğlu,&nbsp;Serhat Özbay,&nbsp;Salih Çabuk","doi":"10.1002/ejsc.12306","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study addresses a critical limitation in existing computational tools for modeling post-exercise oxygen consumption kinetics (V̇O<sub>2</sub>). Although exponential modeling provides practical insights into recovery dynamics, the inability to incorporate an individual's pre-exercise baseline oxygen consumption value (V̇O<sub>2</sub>_<sub>baseline</sub>) can lead to inaccurate interpretations. A user-defined baseline allows for more precise modeling by aligning recovery kinetics with the true physiological endpoint, representing the individual's actual recovery target after a sufficient rest. To overcome this limitation, this study employs a customized Python algorithm that incorporates user-defined baseline V̇O<sub>2</sub> and uses both mono-exponential and bi-exponential models, aiming to improve upon existing analytical methods. Twenty-two male amateur soccer players participated in this study and performed a 30-s Wingate test. V̇O<sub>2</sub> was measured continuously before, during, and after exercise via a metabolic gas analyzer. Both mono-exponential and bi-exponential models were used to analyze post-exercise V̇O<sub>2</sub> kinetics. The analysis was performed using Origin software (as the reference tool), GedaeLab (a specialized web-based platform), and a custom-developed Python algorithm. The bi-exponential model demonstrated superior fit compared to the mono-exponential model with higher determination coefficient (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup>) values. Specifically, <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> values were 0.963 ± 0.013 and 0.805 ± 0.078 for the bi-exponential and mono-exponential models, respectively. The bi-exponential model also provided a more accurate approximation of real post-exercise oxygen consumption integrals at both 5 min and 15 min. Additionally, variations in V̇O<sub>2_baseline</sub> values had different impacts on key parameters in both models, showing that higher V̇O<sub>2_baseline</sub> values generally improved the model fit in the mono-exponential model but had minimal impact on the bi-exponential model.</p>","PeriodicalId":93999,"journal":{"name":"European journal of sport science","volume":"25 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ejsc.12306","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhancing Post-Exercise Oxygen Kinetics Modeling With Physiological Bounds and Manual V̇O2_baseline Input: A Novel Approach\",\"authors\":\"Süleyman Ulupınar,&nbsp;İzzet İnce,&nbsp;Cebrail Gençoğlu,&nbsp;Serhat Özbay,&nbsp;Salih Çabuk\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ejsc.12306\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This study addresses a critical limitation in existing computational tools for modeling post-exercise oxygen consumption kinetics (V̇O<sub>2</sub>). Although exponential modeling provides practical insights into recovery dynamics, the inability to incorporate an individual's pre-exercise baseline oxygen consumption value (V̇O<sub>2</sub>_<sub>baseline</sub>) can lead to inaccurate interpretations. A user-defined baseline allows for more precise modeling by aligning recovery kinetics with the true physiological endpoint, representing the individual's actual recovery target after a sufficient rest. To overcome this limitation, this study employs a customized Python algorithm that incorporates user-defined baseline V̇O<sub>2</sub> and uses both mono-exponential and bi-exponential models, aiming to improve upon existing analytical methods. Twenty-two male amateur soccer players participated in this study and performed a 30-s Wingate test. V̇O<sub>2</sub> was measured continuously before, during, and after exercise via a metabolic gas analyzer. Both mono-exponential and bi-exponential models were used to analyze post-exercise V̇O<sub>2</sub> kinetics. The analysis was performed using Origin software (as the reference tool), GedaeLab (a specialized web-based platform), and a custom-developed Python algorithm. The bi-exponential model demonstrated superior fit compared to the mono-exponential model with higher determination coefficient (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup>) values. Specifically, <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> values were 0.963 ± 0.013 and 0.805 ± 0.078 for the bi-exponential and mono-exponential models, respectively. The bi-exponential model also provided a more accurate approximation of real post-exercise oxygen consumption integrals at both 5 min and 15 min. Additionally, variations in V̇O<sub>2_baseline</sub> values had different impacts on key parameters in both models, showing that higher V̇O<sub>2_baseline</sub> values generally improved the model fit in the mono-exponential model but had minimal impact on the bi-exponential model.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93999,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European journal of sport science\",\"volume\":\"25 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ejsc.12306\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European journal of sport science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ejsc.12306\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of sport science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ejsc.12306","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项研究解决了现有计算工具在模拟运动后氧消耗动力学(V / O2)方面的一个关键限制。虽然指数模型为恢复动力学提供了实用的见解,但不能将个人运动前的基线耗氧量(V * O2_baseline)纳入其中可能导致不准确的解释。用户定义的基线可以通过将恢复动力学与真实的生理终点(代表个体在充分休息后的实际恢复目标)对齐来实现更精确的建模。为了克服这一限制,本研究采用了一种定制的Python算法,该算法结合了用户自定义的基线V / O2,并使用单指数和双指数模型,旨在改进现有的分析方法。22名男性业余足球运动员参加了本研究,并进行了30-s温盖特测试。通过代谢气体分析仪连续测量运动前、运动中、运动后的V (O2)。采用单指数和双指数模型分析运动后的V / O2动力学。使用Origin软件(作为参考工具)、GedaeLab(一个专门的基于web的平台)和定制开发的Python算法进行分析。双指数模型具有较高的决定系数(R2)值,拟合效果优于单指数模型。其中,双指数和单指数模型的R2分别为0.963±0.013和0.805±0.078。双指数模型还能更准确地逼近运动后5分钟和15分钟的真实耗氧量积分。此外,两种模型的关键参数均受V / O2_baseline值变化的影响不同,表明单指数模型中较高的V / O2_baseline值总体上改善了模型的拟合,但对双指数模型的影响最小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Enhancing Post-Exercise Oxygen Kinetics Modeling With Physiological Bounds and Manual V̇O2_baseline Input: A Novel Approach

Enhancing Post-Exercise Oxygen Kinetics Modeling With Physiological Bounds and Manual V̇O2_baseline Input: A Novel Approach

This study addresses a critical limitation in existing computational tools for modeling post-exercise oxygen consumption kinetics (V̇O2). Although exponential modeling provides practical insights into recovery dynamics, the inability to incorporate an individual's pre-exercise baseline oxygen consumption value (V̇O2_baseline) can lead to inaccurate interpretations. A user-defined baseline allows for more precise modeling by aligning recovery kinetics with the true physiological endpoint, representing the individual's actual recovery target after a sufficient rest. To overcome this limitation, this study employs a customized Python algorithm that incorporates user-defined baseline V̇O2 and uses both mono-exponential and bi-exponential models, aiming to improve upon existing analytical methods. Twenty-two male amateur soccer players participated in this study and performed a 30-s Wingate test. V̇O2 was measured continuously before, during, and after exercise via a metabolic gas analyzer. Both mono-exponential and bi-exponential models were used to analyze post-exercise V̇O2 kinetics. The analysis was performed using Origin software (as the reference tool), GedaeLab (a specialized web-based platform), and a custom-developed Python algorithm. The bi-exponential model demonstrated superior fit compared to the mono-exponential model with higher determination coefficient (R2) values. Specifically, R2 values were 0.963 ± 0.013 and 0.805 ± 0.078 for the bi-exponential and mono-exponential models, respectively. The bi-exponential model also provided a more accurate approximation of real post-exercise oxygen consumption integrals at both 5 min and 15 min. Additionally, variations in V̇O2_baseline values had different impacts on key parameters in both models, showing that higher V̇O2_baseline values generally improved the model fit in the mono-exponential model but had minimal impact on the bi-exponential model.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信