通过协商倡导新思想

IF 10.1 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Joshua Mahaney, Thomas Gillier, Fiona Schweitzer
{"title":"通过协商倡导新思想","authors":"Joshua Mahaney,&nbsp;Thomas Gillier,&nbsp;Fiona Schweitzer","doi":"10.1111/jpim.12776","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Idea championing is key for implementing new ideas. A few research studies show that inventors use the consultation tactic to champion their new ideas inside organizations—that is, inventors ask others to contribute to their new ideas in the hope of obtaining others' commitment. However, prior research does not indicate <i>why</i> inventors should use consultation and <i>when</i> it is beneficial. This research proposes that consultation enhances psychological ownership, and that psychological ownership increases idea commitment. Additionally, we posit that the extent to which idea receivers contribute and build psychological ownership will vary depending on the format of the new idea. We hypothesize that consultation is beneficial when idea receivers are asked to contribute to low-elaborated ideas framed in a non-narrative format, as this type of idea format provides greater opportunities for inputs. In contrast, we argue that idea receivers build less psychological ownership when they are asked to contribute to high-elaborated ideas and/or ideas framed in a narrative format (e.g., storytelling). An exploratory survey with 204 inventors confirms that the use of consultation for gaining idea commitment is widespread in companies. The survey shows that inventors present their new ideas at varying levels of elaboration and narrative format. Furthermore, three laboratory experiments provide strong support for our predictions. This study extends our understanding of the idea championing process by providing new insights into how consultation best fosters psychological ownership.</p>","PeriodicalId":16900,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Product Innovation Management","volume":"42 3","pages":"614-638"},"PeriodicalIF":10.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Championing new ideas with consultation\",\"authors\":\"Joshua Mahaney,&nbsp;Thomas Gillier,&nbsp;Fiona Schweitzer\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jpim.12776\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Idea championing is key for implementing new ideas. A few research studies show that inventors use the consultation tactic to champion their new ideas inside organizations—that is, inventors ask others to contribute to their new ideas in the hope of obtaining others' commitment. However, prior research does not indicate <i>why</i> inventors should use consultation and <i>when</i> it is beneficial. This research proposes that consultation enhances psychological ownership, and that psychological ownership increases idea commitment. Additionally, we posit that the extent to which idea receivers contribute and build psychological ownership will vary depending on the format of the new idea. We hypothesize that consultation is beneficial when idea receivers are asked to contribute to low-elaborated ideas framed in a non-narrative format, as this type of idea format provides greater opportunities for inputs. In contrast, we argue that idea receivers build less psychological ownership when they are asked to contribute to high-elaborated ideas and/or ideas framed in a narrative format (e.g., storytelling). An exploratory survey with 204 inventors confirms that the use of consultation for gaining idea commitment is widespread in companies. The survey shows that inventors present their new ideas at varying levels of elaboration and narrative format. Furthermore, three laboratory experiments provide strong support for our predictions. This study extends our understanding of the idea championing process by providing new insights into how consultation best fosters psychological ownership.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16900,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Product Innovation Management\",\"volume\":\"42 3\",\"pages\":\"614-638\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Product Innovation Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jpim.12776\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Product Innovation Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jpim.12776","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

支持想法是实现新想法的关键。一些研究表明,发明家使用咨询策略在组织内部支持他们的新想法,也就是说,发明家要求其他人为他们的新想法做出贡献,希望得到其他人的承诺。然而,先前的研究并没有表明为什么发明者应该使用咨询以及何时使用咨询是有益的。本研究提出咨询可以增强心理所有权,心理所有权可以增加想法承诺。此外,我们假设想法接受者贡献和建立心理所有权的程度将根据新想法的格式而变化。我们假设,当想法接受者被要求以非叙述的形式提供低层次的想法时,咨询是有益的,因为这种类型的想法形式提供了更多的输入机会。相反,我们认为,当想法接受者被要求提供高度阐述的想法和/或以叙事形式(例如,讲故事)构建的想法时,他们的心理所有权就会减少。一项针对204名发明家的探索性调查证实,通过咨询获得创意承诺的做法在公司里很普遍。调查显示,发明者以不同程度的阐述和叙述形式呈现他们的新想法。此外,三个实验室实验为我们的预测提供了强有力的支持。这项研究通过提供关于咨询如何最好地培养心理所有权的新见解,扩展了我们对想法倡导过程的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Championing new ideas with consultation

Idea championing is key for implementing new ideas. A few research studies show that inventors use the consultation tactic to champion their new ideas inside organizations—that is, inventors ask others to contribute to their new ideas in the hope of obtaining others' commitment. However, prior research does not indicate why inventors should use consultation and when it is beneficial. This research proposes that consultation enhances psychological ownership, and that psychological ownership increases idea commitment. Additionally, we posit that the extent to which idea receivers contribute and build psychological ownership will vary depending on the format of the new idea. We hypothesize that consultation is beneficial when idea receivers are asked to contribute to low-elaborated ideas framed in a non-narrative format, as this type of idea format provides greater opportunities for inputs. In contrast, we argue that idea receivers build less psychological ownership when they are asked to contribute to high-elaborated ideas and/or ideas framed in a narrative format (e.g., storytelling). An exploratory survey with 204 inventors confirms that the use of consultation for gaining idea commitment is widespread in companies. The survey shows that inventors present their new ideas at varying levels of elaboration and narrative format. Furthermore, three laboratory experiments provide strong support for our predictions. This study extends our understanding of the idea championing process by providing new insights into how consultation best fosters psychological ownership.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Product Innovation Management
Journal of Product Innovation Management 管理科学-工程:工业
CiteScore
17.00
自引率
5.70%
发文量
42
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Product Innovation Management is a leading academic journal focused on research, theory, and practice in innovation and new product development. It covers a broad scope of issues crucial to successful innovation in both external and internal organizational environments. The journal aims to inform, provoke thought, and contribute to the knowledge and practice of new product development and innovation management. It welcomes original articles from organizations of all sizes and domains, including start-ups, small to medium-sized enterprises, and large corporations, as well as from consumer, business-to-business, and policy domains. The journal accepts various quantitative and qualitative methodologies, and authors from diverse disciplines and functional perspectives are encouraged to submit their work.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信