{"title":"电荷守恒、无条件稳定的电磁有限元粒子内单元代码基准测试:验证三维非线性多物理场仿真","authors":"Omkar H. Ramachandran;B. Shanker","doi":"10.1109/MAP.2025.3537958","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To a large extent, particle-in-cell (PIC) methods have become the default means of understanding plasma physics. As a result, there are a spate of codes, public and otherwise, that are heavily used. Most of these codes fall under two categories: 1) they largely deal with electrostatic problems or 2) are 1D/2D. As a result, there is a paucity of benchmarking tests that can be used to validate codes and methods that are used to analyze 3D problems. This is especially true when designing methods that seek to break conventional analysis methods, like using unstructured meshes or implicit time-stepping schemes. This review seeks to address this need. We present a number of results that one can use to validate and benchmark 3D electromagnetic finite-element method PIC (EM-FEMPIC) codes for collisionless plasma and beam dynamics systems. Three test cases are presented in significant detail, including beam expansion due to static space-charge expansion, the acceleration of a relativistic bunch by an radio-frequency (RF)-accelerating structure, and benchmarks of accuracy and energy conservation of the particle push. The presented results are compared against either analytical data or those from other codes.","PeriodicalId":13090,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine","volume":"67 2","pages":"76-86"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Benchmarking-Charge-Conserving, Unconditionally Stable, Electromagnetic Finite-Element Particle-in-Cell Codes: Validating 3D nonlinear multiphysics simulations\",\"authors\":\"Omkar H. Ramachandran;B. Shanker\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/MAP.2025.3537958\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"To a large extent, particle-in-cell (PIC) methods have become the default means of understanding plasma physics. As a result, there are a spate of codes, public and otherwise, that are heavily used. Most of these codes fall under two categories: 1) they largely deal with electrostatic problems or 2) are 1D/2D. As a result, there is a paucity of benchmarking tests that can be used to validate codes and methods that are used to analyze 3D problems. This is especially true when designing methods that seek to break conventional analysis methods, like using unstructured meshes or implicit time-stepping schemes. This review seeks to address this need. We present a number of results that one can use to validate and benchmark 3D electromagnetic finite-element method PIC (EM-FEMPIC) codes for collisionless plasma and beam dynamics systems. Three test cases are presented in significant detail, including beam expansion due to static space-charge expansion, the acceleration of a relativistic bunch by an radio-frequency (RF)-accelerating structure, and benchmarks of accuracy and energy conservation of the particle push. The presented results are compared against either analytical data or those from other codes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13090,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine\",\"volume\":\"67 2\",\"pages\":\"76-86\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10973223/\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10973223/","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
To a large extent, particle-in-cell (PIC) methods have become the default means of understanding plasma physics. As a result, there are a spate of codes, public and otherwise, that are heavily used. Most of these codes fall under two categories: 1) they largely deal with electrostatic problems or 2) are 1D/2D. As a result, there is a paucity of benchmarking tests that can be used to validate codes and methods that are used to analyze 3D problems. This is especially true when designing methods that seek to break conventional analysis methods, like using unstructured meshes or implicit time-stepping schemes. This review seeks to address this need. We present a number of results that one can use to validate and benchmark 3D electromagnetic finite-element method PIC (EM-FEMPIC) codes for collisionless plasma and beam dynamics systems. Three test cases are presented in significant detail, including beam expansion due to static space-charge expansion, the acceleration of a relativistic bunch by an radio-frequency (RF)-accelerating structure, and benchmarks of accuracy and energy conservation of the particle push. The presented results are compared against either analytical data or those from other codes.
期刊介绍:
IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine actively solicits feature articles that describe engineering activities taking place in industry, government, and universities. All feature articles are subject to peer review. Emphasis is placed on providing the reader with a general understanding of either a particular subject or of the technical challenges being addressed by various organizations, as well as their capabilities to cope with these challenges. Articles presenting new results, review, tutorial, and historical articles are welcome, as are articles describing examples of good engineering. The technical field of interest of the Magazine is the same as the IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society, and includes the following: antennas, including analysis, design, development, measurement, and testing; radiation, propagation, and the interaction of electromagnetic waves with discrete and continuous media; and applications and systems pertinent to antennas, propagation, and sensing, such as applied optics, millimeter- and sub-millimeter-wave techniques, antenna signal processing and control, radio astronomy, and propagation and radiation aspects of terrestrial and space-based communication, including wireless, mobile, satellite, and telecommunications.