年龄对重大创伤概况和特征的影响:爱尔兰国家重大创伤审计的分析

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Olga Brych , Seif El Hadidi , Pamela Hickey , Rachael Doyle , Conor Deasy , Louise Brent
{"title":"年龄对重大创伤概况和特征的影响:爱尔兰国家重大创伤审计的分析","authors":"Olga Brych ,&nbsp;Seif El Hadidi ,&nbsp;Pamela Hickey ,&nbsp;Rachael Doyle ,&nbsp;Conor Deasy ,&nbsp;Louise Brent","doi":"10.1016/j.injury.2025.112343","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Major trauma (MT) is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, with older adult patients facing unique challenges due to age-related vulnerabilities and higher risks of falls. This study aimed to investigate differences in trauma characteristics, injury mechanisms, and outcomes of older adults compared to all younger patients with MT on a national level.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This retrospective cohort study analysed the national Major Trauma Audit data from 23,765 eligible patients with MT in Ireland of all ages and stratified into two age groups: those under 65 years (<em>n</em> = 12,620) and those aged 65 years or older (<em>n</em> = 11,145). The Major Trauma Audit follows the methodology of National Major Trauma Registry in the UK. Variables assessed included injury severity, comorbidities, length of stay (LOS), and mortality rates. Statistical comparisons were made between the two age groups.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Older adults represent 47 % of the total Irish patient population with MT, with a significantly higher proportion of females (56 %) compared to younger patients (31 %) (<em>P</em> <em>&lt;</em> <em>0.001</em>)<em>.</em> Falls of less than two meters were the leading mechanism of injury for older adults (82 %), while road traffic accidents (RTA) were more common among younger patients (25 %). Severe injuries were observed in 34 % of both age groups, but &lt;10 % of older adults were received by a trauma team. Comorbidities were significantly more prevalent in older adults (75 %) compared to 39 % in younger patients, (<em>P</em> <em>&lt;</em> <em>0.001</em>). Median hospital LOS was twelve days for older adults, compared to seven days for younger patients. Mortality rates were significantly higher among the older patient population, who were also more likely to be discharged to long-term care, (<em>P</em> <em>&lt;</em> <em>0.001)</em>.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>In comparison to younger patients, the present study highlights that older adults who experience major trauma are frequently under-triaged as suspected MT, leading to delays in care, inadequate treatment, or worse clinical outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54978,"journal":{"name":"Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured","volume":"56 6","pages":"Article 112343"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of age on major trauma profile and characterisation: Analysis from the national major trauma audit in Ireland\",\"authors\":\"Olga Brych ,&nbsp;Seif El Hadidi ,&nbsp;Pamela Hickey ,&nbsp;Rachael Doyle ,&nbsp;Conor Deasy ,&nbsp;Louise Brent\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.injury.2025.112343\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Major trauma (MT) is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, with older adult patients facing unique challenges due to age-related vulnerabilities and higher risks of falls. This study aimed to investigate differences in trauma characteristics, injury mechanisms, and outcomes of older adults compared to all younger patients with MT on a national level.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This retrospective cohort study analysed the national Major Trauma Audit data from 23,765 eligible patients with MT in Ireland of all ages and stratified into two age groups: those under 65 years (<em>n</em> = 12,620) and those aged 65 years or older (<em>n</em> = 11,145). The Major Trauma Audit follows the methodology of National Major Trauma Registry in the UK. Variables assessed included injury severity, comorbidities, length of stay (LOS), and mortality rates. Statistical comparisons were made between the two age groups.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Older adults represent 47 % of the total Irish patient population with MT, with a significantly higher proportion of females (56 %) compared to younger patients (31 %) (<em>P</em> <em>&lt;</em> <em>0.001</em>)<em>.</em> Falls of less than two meters were the leading mechanism of injury for older adults (82 %), while road traffic accidents (RTA) were more common among younger patients (25 %). Severe injuries were observed in 34 % of both age groups, but &lt;10 % of older adults were received by a trauma team. Comorbidities were significantly more prevalent in older adults (75 %) compared to 39 % in younger patients, (<em>P</em> <em>&lt;</em> <em>0.001</em>). Median hospital LOS was twelve days for older adults, compared to seven days for younger patients. Mortality rates were significantly higher among the older patient population, who were also more likely to be discharged to long-term care, (<em>P</em> <em>&lt;</em> <em>0.001)</em>.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>In comparison to younger patients, the present study highlights that older adults who experience major trauma are frequently under-triaged as suspected MT, leading to delays in care, inadequate treatment, or worse clinical outcomes.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54978,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured\",\"volume\":\"56 6\",\"pages\":\"Article 112343\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020138325002037\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020138325002037","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

重大创伤(MT)是世界范围内发病率和死亡率的重要原因,由于年龄相关的脆弱性和更高的跌倒风险,老年患者面临着独特的挑战。本研究旨在调查全国范围内老年人与所有年轻MT患者在创伤特征、损伤机制和预后方面的差异。方法:本回顾性队列研究分析了爱尔兰23,765名符合条件的MT患者的国家重大创伤审计数据,并将其分为两个年龄组:65岁以下(n = 12,620)和65岁及以上(n = 11145)。重大创伤审计遵循英国国家重大创伤登记处的方法。评估的变量包括损伤严重程度、合并症、住院时间(LOS)和死亡率。对两个年龄组进行了统计比较。结果成年患者占爱尔兰MT患者总数的47%,女性患者的比例(56%)明显高于年轻患者(31%)(P <;0.001)。不到两米的跌落是老年人受伤的主要机制(82%),而道路交通事故(RTA)在年轻患者中更为常见(25%)。在两个年龄组中,有34%的人受到严重伤害,但只有10%的老年人接受了创伤小组的治疗。合并症在老年人中更为普遍(75%),而在年轻患者中为39% (P <;0.001)。老年人住院时间的中位数为12天,而年轻患者为7天。老年患者的死亡率明显更高,他们也更有可能出院接受长期护理,(P <;0.001)。结论与年轻患者相比,本研究强调,经历重大创伤的老年人经常被误诊为疑似MT,导致护理延误,治疗不足或临床结果更差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of age on major trauma profile and characterisation: Analysis from the national major trauma audit in Ireland

Background

Major trauma (MT) is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, with older adult patients facing unique challenges due to age-related vulnerabilities and higher risks of falls. This study aimed to investigate differences in trauma characteristics, injury mechanisms, and outcomes of older adults compared to all younger patients with MT on a national level.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study analysed the national Major Trauma Audit data from 23,765 eligible patients with MT in Ireland of all ages and stratified into two age groups: those under 65 years (n = 12,620) and those aged 65 years or older (n = 11,145). The Major Trauma Audit follows the methodology of National Major Trauma Registry in the UK. Variables assessed included injury severity, comorbidities, length of stay (LOS), and mortality rates. Statistical comparisons were made between the two age groups.

Results

Older adults represent 47 % of the total Irish patient population with MT, with a significantly higher proportion of females (56 %) compared to younger patients (31 %) (P < 0.001). Falls of less than two meters were the leading mechanism of injury for older adults (82 %), while road traffic accidents (RTA) were more common among younger patients (25 %). Severe injuries were observed in 34 % of both age groups, but <10 % of older adults were received by a trauma team. Comorbidities were significantly more prevalent in older adults (75 %) compared to 39 % in younger patients, (P < 0.001). Median hospital LOS was twelve days for older adults, compared to seven days for younger patients. Mortality rates were significantly higher among the older patient population, who were also more likely to be discharged to long-term care, (P < 0.001).

Conclusion

In comparison to younger patients, the present study highlights that older adults who experience major trauma are frequently under-triaged as suspected MT, leading to delays in care, inadequate treatment, or worse clinical outcomes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
8.00%
发文量
699
审稿时长
96 days
期刊介绍: Injury was founded in 1969 and is an international journal dealing with all aspects of trauma care and accident surgery. Our primary aim is to facilitate the exchange of ideas, techniques and information among all members of the trauma team.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信