{"title":"在泰国的热带干湿森林中,藤本植物表现出较低的叶片抗旱性","authors":"Lu Han , Pimnara Tinprabat , Phisamai Maenpuen , Wirong Chanthorn , Dokrak Marod , Pantana Tor-ngern , Sathid Thinkampheang , Anuttara Nathalang , Warren Y. Brockelman , Shubin Zhang , Yajun Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.flora.2025.152730","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The abundance and diversity of tropical lianas have been increasing, particularly in forests experiencing seasonal drought. Leaf drought resistance is a critical leaf function associated with plant survival, growth, and reproduction. However, it remains debated whether leaf drought resistance between coexisting trees and lianas differs along gradients of water availability. In this study, we compared leaf pressure volume curves and leaf morphological traits of 78 co-occurring liana and tree species from two tropical seasonal forests with differing water availability in Thailand. We found that lianas showed a less negative (lower drought resistance) water potential at turgor loss (Ψ<sub>tlp</sub>) than co-occurring trees in both tropical dry and wet forests. Lianas and trees from the tropical dry forest exhibited a higher leaf drought resistance than those from the tropical wet forest. Overall, growth-form and site explained more variation in leaf drought resistance than phylogeny, indicating that leaf drought resistance is labile under contrasting water availability. When considering the effects of phylogeny, there is a correlated evolution of leaf drought resistance and morphological traits (e.g. leaf thickness, leaf mass per area, leaf density, and leaf dry mass content) across species. We conclude that lianas have lower leaf drought resistance compared to co-occurring trees in both tropical dry and wet forests. Further studies are necessary to examine how these trait differences between co-occurring lianas and trees change along a broader aridity gradient.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55156,"journal":{"name":"Flora","volume":"327 ","pages":"Article 152730"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lianas exhibit lower leaf drought resistance than trees in both tropical dry and wet forests in Thailand\",\"authors\":\"Lu Han , Pimnara Tinprabat , Phisamai Maenpuen , Wirong Chanthorn , Dokrak Marod , Pantana Tor-ngern , Sathid Thinkampheang , Anuttara Nathalang , Warren Y. Brockelman , Shubin Zhang , Yajun Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.flora.2025.152730\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The abundance and diversity of tropical lianas have been increasing, particularly in forests experiencing seasonal drought. Leaf drought resistance is a critical leaf function associated with plant survival, growth, and reproduction. However, it remains debated whether leaf drought resistance between coexisting trees and lianas differs along gradients of water availability. In this study, we compared leaf pressure volume curves and leaf morphological traits of 78 co-occurring liana and tree species from two tropical seasonal forests with differing water availability in Thailand. We found that lianas showed a less negative (lower drought resistance) water potential at turgor loss (Ψ<sub>tlp</sub>) than co-occurring trees in both tropical dry and wet forests. Lianas and trees from the tropical dry forest exhibited a higher leaf drought resistance than those from the tropical wet forest. Overall, growth-form and site explained more variation in leaf drought resistance than phylogeny, indicating that leaf drought resistance is labile under contrasting water availability. When considering the effects of phylogeny, there is a correlated evolution of leaf drought resistance and morphological traits (e.g. leaf thickness, leaf mass per area, leaf density, and leaf dry mass content) across species. We conclude that lianas have lower leaf drought resistance compared to co-occurring trees in both tropical dry and wet forests. Further studies are necessary to examine how these trait differences between co-occurring lianas and trees change along a broader aridity gradient.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55156,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Flora\",\"volume\":\"327 \",\"pages\":\"Article 152730\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Flora\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S036725302500060X\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Flora","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S036725302500060X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Lianas exhibit lower leaf drought resistance than trees in both tropical dry and wet forests in Thailand
The abundance and diversity of tropical lianas have been increasing, particularly in forests experiencing seasonal drought. Leaf drought resistance is a critical leaf function associated with plant survival, growth, and reproduction. However, it remains debated whether leaf drought resistance between coexisting trees and lianas differs along gradients of water availability. In this study, we compared leaf pressure volume curves and leaf morphological traits of 78 co-occurring liana and tree species from two tropical seasonal forests with differing water availability in Thailand. We found that lianas showed a less negative (lower drought resistance) water potential at turgor loss (Ψtlp) than co-occurring trees in both tropical dry and wet forests. Lianas and trees from the tropical dry forest exhibited a higher leaf drought resistance than those from the tropical wet forest. Overall, growth-form and site explained more variation in leaf drought resistance than phylogeny, indicating that leaf drought resistance is labile under contrasting water availability. When considering the effects of phylogeny, there is a correlated evolution of leaf drought resistance and morphological traits (e.g. leaf thickness, leaf mass per area, leaf density, and leaf dry mass content) across species. We conclude that lianas have lower leaf drought resistance compared to co-occurring trees in both tropical dry and wet forests. Further studies are necessary to examine how these trait differences between co-occurring lianas and trees change along a broader aridity gradient.
期刊介绍:
FLORA publishes original contributions and review articles on plant structure (morphology and anatomy), plant distribution (incl. phylogeography) and plant functional ecology (ecophysiology, population ecology and population genetics, organismic interactions, community ecology, ecosystem ecology). Manuscripts (both original and review articles) on a single topic can be compiled in Special Issues, for which suggestions are welcome.
FLORA, the scientific botanical journal with the longest uninterrupted publication sequence (since 1818), considers manuscripts in the above areas which appeal a broad scientific and international readership. Manuscripts focused on floristics and vegetation science will only be considered if they exceed the pure descriptive approach and have relevance for interpreting plant morphology, distribution or ecology. Manuscripts whose content is restricted to purely systematic and nomenclature matters, to geobotanical aspects of only local interest, to pure applications in agri-, horti- or silviculture and pharmacology, and experimental studies dealing exclusively with investigations at the cellular and subcellular level will not be accepted. Manuscripts dealing with comparative and evolutionary aspects of morphology, anatomy and development are welcome.