J. González-Camejo , A.L. Eusebi , F. Fatone , M. Pachés
{"title":"生产安全再生水和生物肥料的本土微藻联合体。用于复制、扩大规模和立法分析的批量试验","authors":"J. González-Camejo , A.L. Eusebi , F. Fatone , M. Pachés","doi":"10.1016/j.algal.2025.104043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study aimed to assess the potential of using indigenous microalgae to treat sewage and produce safe reclaimed water and bio-fertilisers. Cultivation tests were conducted using sole or mixed sewage streams combining primary effluent (PSE), secondary effluent (SSE), and centrate (CEN) to identify the most suitable substrate. Overall, higher nitrogen removal rates, biomass productivity, and carbon biofixation were observed when microalgae were cultivated in PSE compared to SSE, with values ranging from 2.1 to 12.1 mgN·L<sup>−1</sup>·d<sup>−1</sup>, 18 to 52 mgVSS·L<sup>−1</sup>·d<sup>−1</sup> (20–53 mgTSS·L<sup>−1</sup>·d<sup>−1</sup>), and 10.7 to 27.0 mgCO<sub>2</sub>·L<sup>−1</sup>·d<sup>−1</sup>, respectively. Adding centrate improved microalgae performance by increasing the availability of nutrients and inorganic carbon, but when 30 % centrate was added, detrimental effects were observed. The costs of the microalgae-based treatment process ranged from 0.081 to 0.098 €·m<sup>−3</sup>, which is significantly lower than those of conventional activated sludge (CAS) processes. The reclaimed water obtained during the tests demonstrated high-quality in terms of pathogen and metal levels, making it suitable (in Spain) for agricultural, recreational, industrial and environmental uses. However, some legal gaps were identified regarding the use of reclaimed water and microalgae biomass for bio-fertiliser production.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7855,"journal":{"name":"Algal Research-Biomass Biofuels and Bioproducts","volume":"89 ","pages":"Article 104043"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Indigenous microalgae consortium for producing safe reclaimed water and bio-fertilisers. Batch tests for replication, scale-up and legislative analysis\",\"authors\":\"J. González-Camejo , A.L. Eusebi , F. Fatone , M. Pachés\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.algal.2025.104043\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study aimed to assess the potential of using indigenous microalgae to treat sewage and produce safe reclaimed water and bio-fertilisers. Cultivation tests were conducted using sole or mixed sewage streams combining primary effluent (PSE), secondary effluent (SSE), and centrate (CEN) to identify the most suitable substrate. Overall, higher nitrogen removal rates, biomass productivity, and carbon biofixation were observed when microalgae were cultivated in PSE compared to SSE, with values ranging from 2.1 to 12.1 mgN·L<sup>−1</sup>·d<sup>−1</sup>, 18 to 52 mgVSS·L<sup>−1</sup>·d<sup>−1</sup> (20–53 mgTSS·L<sup>−1</sup>·d<sup>−1</sup>), and 10.7 to 27.0 mgCO<sub>2</sub>·L<sup>−1</sup>·d<sup>−1</sup>, respectively. Adding centrate improved microalgae performance by increasing the availability of nutrients and inorganic carbon, but when 30 % centrate was added, detrimental effects were observed. The costs of the microalgae-based treatment process ranged from 0.081 to 0.098 €·m<sup>−3</sup>, which is significantly lower than those of conventional activated sludge (CAS) processes. The reclaimed water obtained during the tests demonstrated high-quality in terms of pathogen and metal levels, making it suitable (in Spain) for agricultural, recreational, industrial and environmental uses. However, some legal gaps were identified regarding the use of reclaimed water and microalgae biomass for bio-fertiliser production.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7855,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Algal Research-Biomass Biofuels and Bioproducts\",\"volume\":\"89 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104043\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Algal Research-Biomass Biofuels and Bioproducts\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211926425001523\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Algal Research-Biomass Biofuels and Bioproducts","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211926425001523","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Indigenous microalgae consortium for producing safe reclaimed water and bio-fertilisers. Batch tests for replication, scale-up and legislative analysis
This study aimed to assess the potential of using indigenous microalgae to treat sewage and produce safe reclaimed water and bio-fertilisers. Cultivation tests were conducted using sole or mixed sewage streams combining primary effluent (PSE), secondary effluent (SSE), and centrate (CEN) to identify the most suitable substrate. Overall, higher nitrogen removal rates, biomass productivity, and carbon biofixation were observed when microalgae were cultivated in PSE compared to SSE, with values ranging from 2.1 to 12.1 mgN·L−1·d−1, 18 to 52 mgVSS·L−1·d−1 (20–53 mgTSS·L−1·d−1), and 10.7 to 27.0 mgCO2·L−1·d−1, respectively. Adding centrate improved microalgae performance by increasing the availability of nutrients and inorganic carbon, but when 30 % centrate was added, detrimental effects were observed. The costs of the microalgae-based treatment process ranged from 0.081 to 0.098 €·m−3, which is significantly lower than those of conventional activated sludge (CAS) processes. The reclaimed water obtained during the tests demonstrated high-quality in terms of pathogen and metal levels, making it suitable (in Spain) for agricultural, recreational, industrial and environmental uses. However, some legal gaps were identified regarding the use of reclaimed water and microalgae biomass for bio-fertiliser production.
期刊介绍:
Algal Research is an international phycology journal covering all areas of emerging technologies in algae biology, biomass production, cultivation, harvesting, extraction, bioproducts, biorefinery, engineering, and econometrics. Algae is defined to include cyanobacteria, microalgae, and protists and symbionts of interest in biotechnology. The journal publishes original research and reviews for the following scope: algal biology, including but not exclusive to: phylogeny, biodiversity, molecular traits, metabolic regulation, and genetic engineering, algal cultivation, e.g. phototrophic systems, heterotrophic systems, and mixotrophic systems, algal harvesting and extraction systems, biotechnology to convert algal biomass and components into biofuels and bioproducts, e.g., nutraceuticals, pharmaceuticals, animal feed, plastics, etc. algal products and their economic assessment