R. Panahi , S.A.H. Feghhi , Sh. Sanaye Hajari , M. Khorsandi
{"title":"用人工神经网络确定皮尔斯电子枪半束锥角","authors":"R. Panahi , S.A.H. Feghhi , Sh. Sanaye Hajari , M. Khorsandi","doi":"10.1016/j.rinp.2025.108256","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Various electron gun design methods, especially iterative and noniterative, are generally utilized for preliminary electron gun design based on the input design beam parameters. In the electron gun design methods, calculating the half-beam cone angle is crucial, as it significantly influences the determination of the electron gun’s geometry. In this paper, an Artificial Neural Network (ANN) model was proposed for predicting the half-beam cone angle. The ANN model was trained and tested using experimental data obtained from previously documented studies on electron guns. The predicted results of the<!--> <!-->proposed ANN model were compared with three well-known methods in the electron gun design: iterative method, noniterative method, and modified noniterative method. The comparison indicates that the proposed ANN model achieves better performance than the other methods, with a Main Relative Error (MRE) of less than 5%.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21042,"journal":{"name":"Results in Physics","volume":"73 ","pages":"Article 108256"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Determination of the Half-Beam cone angle for Pierce electron gun design using an artificial neural network\",\"authors\":\"R. Panahi , S.A.H. Feghhi , Sh. Sanaye Hajari , M. Khorsandi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rinp.2025.108256\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Various electron gun design methods, especially iterative and noniterative, are generally utilized for preliminary electron gun design based on the input design beam parameters. In the electron gun design methods, calculating the half-beam cone angle is crucial, as it significantly influences the determination of the electron gun’s geometry. In this paper, an Artificial Neural Network (ANN) model was proposed for predicting the half-beam cone angle. The ANN model was trained and tested using experimental data obtained from previously documented studies on electron guns. The predicted results of the<!--> <!-->proposed ANN model were compared with three well-known methods in the electron gun design: iterative method, noniterative method, and modified noniterative method. The comparison indicates that the proposed ANN model achieves better performance than the other methods, with a Main Relative Error (MRE) of less than 5%.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21042,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Results in Physics\",\"volume\":\"73 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108256\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Results in Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"101\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211379725001500\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"物理与天体物理\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Results in Physics","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211379725001500","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Determination of the Half-Beam cone angle for Pierce electron gun design using an artificial neural network
Various electron gun design methods, especially iterative and noniterative, are generally utilized for preliminary electron gun design based on the input design beam parameters. In the electron gun design methods, calculating the half-beam cone angle is crucial, as it significantly influences the determination of the electron gun’s geometry. In this paper, an Artificial Neural Network (ANN) model was proposed for predicting the half-beam cone angle. The ANN model was trained and tested using experimental data obtained from previously documented studies on electron guns. The predicted results of the proposed ANN model were compared with three well-known methods in the electron gun design: iterative method, noniterative method, and modified noniterative method. The comparison indicates that the proposed ANN model achieves better performance than the other methods, with a Main Relative Error (MRE) of less than 5%.
Results in PhysicsMATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARYPHYSIC-PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
9.40%
发文量
754
审稿时长
50 days
期刊介绍:
Results in Physics is an open access journal offering authors the opportunity to publish in all fundamental and interdisciplinary areas of physics, materials science, and applied physics. Papers of a theoretical, computational, and experimental nature are all welcome. Results in Physics accepts papers that are scientifically sound, technically correct and provide valuable new knowledge to the physics community. Topics such as three-dimensional flow and magnetohydrodynamics are not within the scope of Results in Physics.
Results in Physics welcomes three types of papers:
1. Full research papers
2. Microarticles: very short papers, no longer than two pages. They may consist of a single, but well-described piece of information, such as:
- Data and/or a plot plus a description
- Description of a new method or instrumentation
- Negative results
- Concept or design study
3. Letters to the Editor: Letters discussing a recent article published in Results in Physics are welcome. These are objective, constructive, or educational critiques of papers published in Results in Physics. Accepted letters will be sent to the author of the original paper for a response. Each letter and response is published together. Letters should be received within 8 weeks of the article''s publication. They should not exceed 750 words of text and 10 references.