健康受试者和神经退行性疾病患者的迷你精神状态检查和蒙特利尔认知评估的等效转换规范

IF 3.9
Sara Bernini , Elena Ballante , Marta Picascia , Marica Barbieri , Alfredo Costa , Elena Cavallini , Cristina Tassorelli , Tomaso Vecchi , Sara Bottiroli
{"title":"健康受试者和神经退行性疾病患者的迷你精神状态检查和蒙特利尔认知评估的等效转换规范","authors":"Sara Bernini ,&nbsp;Elena Ballante ,&nbsp;Marta Picascia ,&nbsp;Marica Barbieri ,&nbsp;Alfredo Costa ,&nbsp;Elena Cavallini ,&nbsp;Cristina Tassorelli ,&nbsp;Tomaso Vecchi ,&nbsp;Sara Bottiroli","doi":"10.1016/j.exger.2025.112756","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) are globally recognized as validated cognitive screening tests widely used.</div></div><div><h3>Objective/aim</h3><div>The present study attempted to provide conversion tables from the MMSE to the MoCA and vice versa, deriving them from a large population of healthy older adults and a representative clinical sample of subjects with different types of cognitive decline within the spectrum of Alzheimer's (AD) and Parkinson's (PD) diseases.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A total of 1423 Italian participants, including healthy adults (n = 1203), individuals with AD (n = 93), and with PD (n = 127) were assessed using the MMSE and MoCA. Conversion tables were developed using log-linear smoothing equipercentile equating (LSEE). The reliability of the conversion was assessed through the Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) in a train-test approach confirmed in the whole sample.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The findings demonstrated that the LSEE method enables the development of conversion tables allowing users to identify the corresponding MoCA score for each MMSE score within the studied groups, and vice versa. The estimation error RMSE was 1.8, 2.9, and 3.2 for the conversion of MoCA from MMSE and 1.2, 2.3, and 2.2 for the conversion of MMSE from MoCA in healthy subjects, AD, and PD, respectively. The reliability of the conversion is higher in healthy subjects and for higher values of MoCA and MMSE.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Results report easy-to-use conversion norms for transforming raw MMSE score to MoCA and vice versa, highlighting areas were the conversion has a strong or low reliability depending on the score range.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94003,"journal":{"name":"Experimental gerontology","volume":"205 ","pages":"Article 112756"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Equating conversion norms for the Mini-Mental State Examination and Montreal Cognitive Assessment in healthy subjects and patients with neurodegenerative disorders\",\"authors\":\"Sara Bernini ,&nbsp;Elena Ballante ,&nbsp;Marta Picascia ,&nbsp;Marica Barbieri ,&nbsp;Alfredo Costa ,&nbsp;Elena Cavallini ,&nbsp;Cristina Tassorelli ,&nbsp;Tomaso Vecchi ,&nbsp;Sara Bottiroli\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.exger.2025.112756\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) are globally recognized as validated cognitive screening tests widely used.</div></div><div><h3>Objective/aim</h3><div>The present study attempted to provide conversion tables from the MMSE to the MoCA and vice versa, deriving them from a large population of healthy older adults and a representative clinical sample of subjects with different types of cognitive decline within the spectrum of Alzheimer's (AD) and Parkinson's (PD) diseases.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A total of 1423 Italian participants, including healthy adults (n = 1203), individuals with AD (n = 93), and with PD (n = 127) were assessed using the MMSE and MoCA. Conversion tables were developed using log-linear smoothing equipercentile equating (LSEE). The reliability of the conversion was assessed through the Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) in a train-test approach confirmed in the whole sample.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The findings demonstrated that the LSEE method enables the development of conversion tables allowing users to identify the corresponding MoCA score for each MMSE score within the studied groups, and vice versa. The estimation error RMSE was 1.8, 2.9, and 3.2 for the conversion of MoCA from MMSE and 1.2, 2.3, and 2.2 for the conversion of MMSE from MoCA in healthy subjects, AD, and PD, respectively. The reliability of the conversion is higher in healthy subjects and for higher values of MoCA and MMSE.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Results report easy-to-use conversion norms for transforming raw MMSE score to MoCA and vice versa, highlighting areas were the conversion has a strong or low reliability depending on the score range.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94003,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Experimental gerontology\",\"volume\":\"205 \",\"pages\":\"Article 112756\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Experimental gerontology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0531556525000853\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental gerontology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0531556525000853","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言迷你智力状态检查(MMSE)和蒙特利尔认知评估(MoCA)是全球公认的有效认知筛查测试,被广泛使用。本研究试图提供从 MMSE 到 MoCA 的转换表,反之亦然。方法:使用 MMSE 和 MoCA 对 1423 名意大利参与者进行了评估,其中包括健康成年人(1203 人)、AD 患者(93 人)和 PD 患者(127 人)。采用对数线性平滑等分法(LSEE)制定了转换表。结果研究结果表明,LSEE 方法能够编制转换表,使用户能够为研究组中的每个 MMSE 分数确定相应的 MoCA 分数,反之亦然。在健康受试者、AD 和 PD 中,MoCA 与 MMSE 的转换估计误差 RMSE 分别为 1.8、2.9 和 3.2,MMSE 与 MoCA 的转换估计误差 RMSE 分别为 1.2、2.3 和 2.2。健康受试者以及 MoCA 和 MMSE 值越高,转换的可靠性越高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Equating conversion norms for the Mini-Mental State Examination and Montreal Cognitive Assessment in healthy subjects and patients with neurodegenerative disorders

Introduction

The Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) are globally recognized as validated cognitive screening tests widely used.

Objective/aim

The present study attempted to provide conversion tables from the MMSE to the MoCA and vice versa, deriving them from a large population of healthy older adults and a representative clinical sample of subjects with different types of cognitive decline within the spectrum of Alzheimer's (AD) and Parkinson's (PD) diseases.

Methods

A total of 1423 Italian participants, including healthy adults (n = 1203), individuals with AD (n = 93), and with PD (n = 127) were assessed using the MMSE and MoCA. Conversion tables were developed using log-linear smoothing equipercentile equating (LSEE). The reliability of the conversion was assessed through the Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) in a train-test approach confirmed in the whole sample.

Results

The findings demonstrated that the LSEE method enables the development of conversion tables allowing users to identify the corresponding MoCA score for each MMSE score within the studied groups, and vice versa. The estimation error RMSE was 1.8, 2.9, and 3.2 for the conversion of MoCA from MMSE and 1.2, 2.3, and 2.2 for the conversion of MMSE from MoCA in healthy subjects, AD, and PD, respectively. The reliability of the conversion is higher in healthy subjects and for higher values of MoCA and MMSE.

Conclusion

Results report easy-to-use conversion norms for transforming raw MMSE score to MoCA and vice versa, highlighting areas were the conversion has a strong or low reliability depending on the score range.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Experimental gerontology
Experimental gerontology Ageing, Biochemistry, Geriatrics and Gerontology
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
66 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信