用于个性化胫骨植入的3D打印钛TPMS

Martin Appiah , Abul Arafat , Abhishek Gupta , Arun Arjunan , Ahmad Baroutaji , John Robinson , Chameekara T. Wanniarachchi , Manpreet Singh , Neil Ashwood , Aaron Vance
{"title":"用于个性化胫骨植入的3D打印钛TPMS","authors":"Martin Appiah ,&nbsp;Abul Arafat ,&nbsp;Abhishek Gupta ,&nbsp;Arun Arjunan ,&nbsp;Ahmad Baroutaji ,&nbsp;John Robinson ,&nbsp;Chameekara T. Wanniarachchi ,&nbsp;Manpreet Singh ,&nbsp;Neil Ashwood ,&nbsp;Aaron Vance","doi":"10.1016/j.bea.2025.100166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Porous titanium scaffolds offer hope for reducing stress shielding and encouraging new bone growth, moving the field closer to personalised load bearing implants. This study explores four triply periodic minimal surface (TPMS) tibial scaffolds informed by Gyroid (GSC), Lidinoid (LSC), Diamond (DSC), and Schwartz Primitive (SSC) unit cells. These scaffolds were made using Laser Powder Bed Fusion (L-PBF) 3D printing, with a targeted porosity of 60 % to closely match the mechanical behaviour of natural tibial bone. Mechanical testing of these scaffolds revealed an elastic modulus of 10.42 to 13.62 GPa and compressive strengths ranging from 209 to 393 MPa, meeting the requirements for load-bearing tibial implants. Multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods, AHP and TOPSIS, were applied to evaluate the designs, considering four favourable factors of relative importance in the order porosity&gt;yield strength&gt;elastic modulus&gt;ultimate strength. This analysis identified SSC scaffold featuring Schwartz Primitive architecture as the most promising candidate for load-bearing applications. The biological compatibility of these scaffolds was also found to be equally compelling. In vitro testing with U-2OS osteosarcoma cells confirmed high cell viability, underscoring the cytocompatibility of these TPMS designs and reinforcing their potential for biomedical applications. Together, these findings offer a path toward the use of titanium scaffolds in orthopaedics, setting the stage for further in vivo studies and a potential breakthrough in functional bone implant design.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72384,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical engineering advances","volume":"9 ","pages":"Article 100166"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"3D printed titanium TPMS for personalised tibial bone implant\",\"authors\":\"Martin Appiah ,&nbsp;Abul Arafat ,&nbsp;Abhishek Gupta ,&nbsp;Arun Arjunan ,&nbsp;Ahmad Baroutaji ,&nbsp;John Robinson ,&nbsp;Chameekara T. Wanniarachchi ,&nbsp;Manpreet Singh ,&nbsp;Neil Ashwood ,&nbsp;Aaron Vance\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bea.2025.100166\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Porous titanium scaffolds offer hope for reducing stress shielding and encouraging new bone growth, moving the field closer to personalised load bearing implants. This study explores four triply periodic minimal surface (TPMS) tibial scaffolds informed by Gyroid (GSC), Lidinoid (LSC), Diamond (DSC), and Schwartz Primitive (SSC) unit cells. These scaffolds were made using Laser Powder Bed Fusion (L-PBF) 3D printing, with a targeted porosity of 60 % to closely match the mechanical behaviour of natural tibial bone. Mechanical testing of these scaffolds revealed an elastic modulus of 10.42 to 13.62 GPa and compressive strengths ranging from 209 to 393 MPa, meeting the requirements for load-bearing tibial implants. Multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods, AHP and TOPSIS, were applied to evaluate the designs, considering four favourable factors of relative importance in the order porosity&gt;yield strength&gt;elastic modulus&gt;ultimate strength. This analysis identified SSC scaffold featuring Schwartz Primitive architecture as the most promising candidate for load-bearing applications. The biological compatibility of these scaffolds was also found to be equally compelling. In vitro testing with U-2OS osteosarcoma cells confirmed high cell viability, underscoring the cytocompatibility of these TPMS designs and reinforcing their potential for biomedical applications. Together, these findings offer a path toward the use of titanium scaffolds in orthopaedics, setting the stage for further in vivo studies and a potential breakthrough in functional bone implant design.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biomedical engineering advances\",\"volume\":\"9 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100166\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biomedical engineering advances\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667099225000222\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical engineering advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667099225000222","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

多孔钛支架提供了减少压力屏蔽和促进新骨生长的希望,使该领域更接近个性化承重植入物。本研究探讨了由Gyroid (GSC)、Lidinoid (LSC)、Diamond (DSC)和Schwartz Primitive (SSC)单元细胞组成的四种三周期最小表面(TPMS)胫骨支架。这些支架采用激光粉末床融合(L-PBF) 3D打印技术制造,目标孔隙率为60%,与天然胫骨的力学行为密切匹配。力学测试结果表明,该支架弹性模量为10.42 ~ 13.62 GPa,抗压强度为209 ~ 393 MPa,满足承重胫骨植入物的要求。采用多准则决策(MCDM)方法、层次分析法(AHP)和TOPSIS法对设计进行评价,考虑孔隙率、屈服强度、弹性模量、极限强度四个相对重要的因素。该分析确定了SSC支架具有施瓦茨原始结构,是承重应用中最有前途的候选材料。这些支架的生物相容性也同样令人信服。在U-2OS骨肉瘤细胞的体外测试中证实了高细胞活力,强调了这些TPMS设计的细胞相容性,并加强了它们在生物医学应用方面的潜力。总之,这些发现为钛支架在骨科中的应用提供了一条道路,为进一步的体内研究奠定了基础,并在功能性骨植入物设计方面取得了潜在的突破。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
3D printed titanium TPMS for personalised tibial bone implant
Porous titanium scaffolds offer hope for reducing stress shielding and encouraging new bone growth, moving the field closer to personalised load bearing implants. This study explores four triply periodic minimal surface (TPMS) tibial scaffolds informed by Gyroid (GSC), Lidinoid (LSC), Diamond (DSC), and Schwartz Primitive (SSC) unit cells. These scaffolds were made using Laser Powder Bed Fusion (L-PBF) 3D printing, with a targeted porosity of 60 % to closely match the mechanical behaviour of natural tibial bone. Mechanical testing of these scaffolds revealed an elastic modulus of 10.42 to 13.62 GPa and compressive strengths ranging from 209 to 393 MPa, meeting the requirements for load-bearing tibial implants. Multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods, AHP and TOPSIS, were applied to evaluate the designs, considering four favourable factors of relative importance in the order porosity>yield strength>elastic modulus>ultimate strength. This analysis identified SSC scaffold featuring Schwartz Primitive architecture as the most promising candidate for load-bearing applications. The biological compatibility of these scaffolds was also found to be equally compelling. In vitro testing with U-2OS osteosarcoma cells confirmed high cell viability, underscoring the cytocompatibility of these TPMS designs and reinforcing their potential for biomedical applications. Together, these findings offer a path toward the use of titanium scaffolds in orthopaedics, setting the stage for further in vivo studies and a potential breakthrough in functional bone implant design.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biomedical engineering advances
Biomedical engineering advances Bioengineering, Biomedical Engineering
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
59 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信